Good answer, but more a common excuse don't you think. You point to the NYY's success due to lack of cap in BB. I point to the Red Wings, Sharks, Blackhawks as examples in hky. Ownership is a big factor, not just $$ spent on UFAs don't you agree? You need a decisive owner or a strong individual to take charge on a big board of dir.
Bottomline, I am just tired of the Leafs sucking annually when they should be a powershouse given resources, major market, fan base, rev.streams, etc.
I'd like to smoke the same stuff you did tonight, ET.
What does Detroit, Sharks & Chicago's success have to do with the cap? They've succeeded because of a good front office, good scouting, coaching & luck. The Yankees & Red Sox would probably suck if it weren't for the fact they're allowed to outside literally any other team in baseball. With a cap, they'd be put in the level as the other MLB teams who have to get creative in order to get buy.
Considering the amount of billions the Yankees have been spending on players in the past 20 years or more, it's astounding that they haven't won at least 50% of the world series over that time. I can only attribute their failure to do so to gross incompetence on the part of management.
If you compare this to hockey (if there was no cap), a team operating their budget like the Yankees would likely have a salary cap of $200 million, while most of the other teams would be operating under the $60 million range. If that team operating like the Yankees couldn't win a few Stanley Cups every 5 years or so, something would be drastically wrong & they should fire their entire front-office staff, plus their coaches.
Ownership is a factor in all professional sports. But half of the owners out there are egomaniacs & incompetents. I'd rather have a conglomerate owning a team such as the Leafs with a sound GM than having Harold Ballard running the circus with the likes of Gord Stellick & George Armstrong as his support staff.