If you were to have the option to have 1 encounter and you were torn between two providers, one whos face is visible and who you find attractive, or a second provider whos face is blured but whos body is exactly what you are looking and more than likely has a pretty face. Do you take the gamble or the sure thing?
Who would you choose? A provider whos face you can see, or blurred face but with HIGH potential?
- Thread starter that_one_guy
- Start date
It's very rare IMO that the girl with the smoking hot body has a face that's a turn-off somehow. Book who you're most attracted to (or who fits what you're looking for the most) given what info you have. Edit: Also, it's always a gamble, no matter what. The one that's face-out may turn out to have a weird attitude or bad service or who-knows-what and the perfect body may not live up to the hype. Just give'r.
Last edited:
I do 50/50. I mean when a provider has face out or i seen her face before, cause of a party etc, i really like it because there is not much surprises beside maybe the nipples and pussy lol. But i will also book providers with blurred face if there reviews are great and/or the body looks great.
When we were doing the GTs in the mid 2010s, i would make my "list" mostly at these parties. There would be at least 4-5 SPs i would single out because their faces (or personality, or especially a combo of the 2) attracted me that otherwise i may not had pursue "actively".
When we were doing the GTs in the mid 2010s, i would make my "list" mostly at these parties. There would be at least 4-5 SPs i would single out because their faces (or personality, or especially a combo of the 2) attracted me that otherwise i may not had pursue "actively".
Personally i’m cool with no face showing as long as the photos aren’t too photoshopped & the description is accurate & recent.
I would pick the one with the better reviews. That's what this forum is for, to help with this kind of choice. If you're only able to pick one, it might not be the best time to TOFTT.
The reviews about the blurred face hint at her being pretty or not? Because I have in the past seen reviews about blurred faces and they weren’t so kind
Is there a connection between this discussion and the recent comments on the Laeticia@forever thread? Just wondering
Here's the thread, may fuel the discussion https://merb.cc/xenforo/threads/laeticia-forever.246089/page-2
This will be an unpopular opinion, but as of the last few years the risk is becoming less and less appealing. That could be the quality of girls coming into the industry, but it could also be me. Maybe I’m getting a little pickier with old age.
I find myself being a little more disappointed than not as of late. I’d rather walk into an MP or see someone that I know I’m attracted to, be it from a prior visit or the agency sharing pictures in advance.
If I’m not attracted physically, I couldn’t care less about the services. I need that as a starting point.
Just my two cents.
I find myself being a little more disappointed than not as of late. I’d rather walk into an MP or see someone that I know I’m attracted to, be it from a prior visit or the agency sharing pictures in advance.
If I’m not attracted physically, I couldn’t care less about the services. I need that as a starting point.
Just my two cents.
Similar threads
