Racism
General Gonad said:
From page 10 of Marc Levine's book:
"By 1971, as Jews, Italians, Greeks and Portuguese joined the English-speaking community, British Montrealers constituted only 61 percent of the Island's English-speaking community and only 37 percent of Montreal's entire non-Francophone community."
That was over thirty years ago. Since then, these immigrants have had kids that were educated in English and French universities. Why is it that those second generation children of immigrants who are more than capable of working in the civil service, are effectively shut out? Is it possible that institutional racism reigns in Quebec's civil service? I think so and it will be difficult to convince me that this is not the primary factor explaining under-representation of ethnic minorities in Quebec's civil service.
GG
GG,
Your body of work is all over the place and presents a conclusion that can't be assessed (racism).
A prime example of institutional racism would be the 1935 U.S. Social Security Act which textually excluded domestic and agricultural workers, most of which being Mexican-, African- and Asian-Americans, from receiving guaranteed income after retirement.
There is no similar discriminatory Act in Quebec, let alone in Canada. Your theory is groundless.
Your development furthermore confuses union/civil, Anglos/immigrants, 2nd generation immigrants/sons of 1st generation immigrants. On this last item, your logic is also flawed.
Sons of immigrants are not immigrants therefore their representativity in core public administrations can't be considered as such.
Irrespective of their parent's knowledge of official languages, the same sons of immigrants are not necessarily strictly English-speakers. Being born in Quebec, they were immersed in a French-speaking environment from birth and have likely grown into being Francophones or Allophones.
The claim that sons of immigrants are being "shut out" overshadows the possibility that the said sons are pursuing other opportunities.