Montrealxxxtase
Montreal Escorts

Climate change

Don Julio

Active Member
Jul 15, 2023
238
238
43
32
El Nino is known for long time
This is an El Nino year which does have something to do with the weather, to argue it does not shows inability to accept more information than programed to.

Perhaps take the time to read this.

 
Last edited:

Jazzman1218

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2021
888
2,364
93
76
Looks like earth under Cat 5 storm attack!!

A first: Cat 5 storms have formed in every ocean basin this year...

"A combination of human-caused climate change and El Niño have heated ocean waters to record levels in 2023"

They always put "human caused" in every weather article like repetitive brainwashing.
I wish they just stick to empirical observation.
Here's an empirical observation: human-caused climate change is an inconvenient truth for some people.
 
Last edited:

nothinghere

Well-Known Member
Mar 22, 2022
418
312
63
56
This is very interesting pdf scan of 1969 global cooling.

Open

2010 global cooling declared a "Myth"

Statisticians: "Global Cooling" a Myth - CBS News

I remember global cooling in media panic even in 1980's

Yea all the 2000+ nuclear experimental bombs set off for testing.
Not to forget all the volcanos blowing up

The year without a summerNASA (.gov)

I think climate change is more Statistics than science.
Can they Statistically say climate change is 0.001% Human, 1%, 10%, 50% etc...

Yea I was brainwashed in 1980's high school days global cooling so I presently have cognitive dissonance.
Like above user post #1134:

"Since I was a young boy, I have been told one day that eggs are the best thing for me and that I should eat them regularly. The next day, I was told they were the worst thing I could eat and should not eat them"

So much dissonance I must bring up Lord Christopher Moncton.
He looks like Mr Bean hahaha
The media has destroyed his reputation even this week in Canada ????
CBC puts picture of the Lord to make him look like comedian crackpot.

Lord Christopher Monckton - CBC.ca


1694277602746.png



Sadly much has been erased from past 20 years of his battle for the UK

British Political Leader Says Obama Is 'Anti-England'CNBC

I am surprised he is still alive with a youtube channel.
Since he is a "Lord" maybe touchy if youtube deletes.

The Fraudulent Science of Global Warming, Climate Communist Scientists and much more. . .

Interesting old listen none the less hehe.

Edit add:
At 31:00 gets interesting. Lord is at odds with IPCC
1990 the concept of "Human caused climate changed" was introduced.
Lord was upset that only 64 out of 11944 published paper concluded "Human activity" responsible.
This actually was a messy situation. Lord was not crazy. 2014:

The claim of a 97% consensus on global warming does not stand up

Majority of scientific papers could not conclusively prove "Human caused climate change"..too many variables.
Left wing politics only accepted papers to fit their agenda.
Lord was referring to these IPCC intergovernmental organizations.

Climate Change: The IPCC 1990 and 1992 Assessments

World Development Report 2010 Development in a Changing Climate - IPCC

From 2010 IPCC pdf Objectives:

"To help convince the development community that climate change really does represent a changing climate for development, and that development, “the way we’ve always done it”, is not a good way forward."

If you watch youtube Lord Moncton from Canada a link will appear below video by UN Ministry of Climate Change.

Climate change ......creepy

One notable observation by Lord Moncton:
The Green movement calls Carbon Dioxide a pollution but Carbon Dioxide makes the plants Greener hehe nice one
 
Last edited:

nothinghere

Well-Known Member
Mar 22, 2022
418
312
63
56
A decent read.
Wow!! NY Post Knocked it good!!
That article was a seamless transition from Lord Christopher Moncton's battle with academia in my above post.
But so many years later.
Is this the Lord's work??

"And the editors of these journals have made it abundantly clear, both by what they publish and what they reject, that they want climate papers that support certain pre-approved narratives"
"Customized research"

This is Exactly what the Lord Christopher Moncton my above post was fighting IPCC for:
"They select what gets published from a large pool of entries".... as NY post mentions

Select what gets published for the Exact stated 2010 IPCC Objective!!
As I put in above post to repeat:

"To help convince the development community that climate change really does represent a changing climate for development, and that development, “the way we’ve always done it”, is not a good way forward."

I will add NY Post to my feed and subscribe for sure.
Trudeau Bill C-18 CBC Communist Broadcasing Canada won't parrot this NY Post article for sure!
I repost CBC article of Lord Christopher Moncton just for fun.
NY Post is far superior than this spoof below:

Lord Christopher Monckton - CBC

I think CBC block their own interview I cannot play haha
From CBC introduction:

"Well apparently, a few years ago, Monckton was recovering from an illness, and to pass the time, he decided to get into the science of climate change"

Yea I call this CBC technique "Straw man Gaslighting"

Twilight Zone stuff!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mandouke

Jazzman1218

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2021
888
2,364
93
76
A decent read.

First, the NY Post is a right-wing tabloid with extremely low journalistic standards. Second, Patrick T Brown is a known climate change skeptic. He claims to have omitted scientific data to get published and now he's being a "whistle-blower" on himself. He has no more credibility than does the Post. It's all garbage in support of a climate change denying right-wing agenda.
 
Last edited:

Womaniser

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
1,729
3,201
113
First, the NY Post is a right-wing tabloid with extremely low journalistic standards. Second, Patrick T Brown is a known climate change skeptic. He claims to have omitted scientific data to get published and now he's being a "whistle-blower" on himself. He has no more credibility than does the Post. It's all garbage in support of a climate change denying right-wing agenda.

I read that article. Patrick T. Brown didn't deny climate changes, he expressed reserves on the direct links with forest fires in 2023 spring and summer.
Using that article to deny climate changes is a somewhat disonest or non informed twist of the truth.
 

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
7,112
4,061
113
First, the NY Post is a right-wing tabloid with extremely low journalistic standards. Second, Patrick T Brown is a known climate change skeptic. He claims to have omitted scientific data to get published and now he's being a "whistle-blower" on himself. He has no more credibility than does the Post. It's all garbage in support of a climate change denying right-wing agenda.
Many left-wingers and left-wing tabloids are twisting facts and spreading misinformation to cause climate alarmism to push their agenda just to add more taxes and more restrictions. Here are some facts for example forest fires. Majority of forest fires are caused by humans yet far-left wing tabloids and politicians are blaming it all on climate change. I posted about this.


Direct Quote from the Article:

Though it is not yet determined what exactly has caused a number of this year’s earlier-than-usual and more widespread wildfires, there are two common reasons wildfires begin.

Wildfires typically start either from lightning or from human activity, according to fire expert and Queen’s University fellow Edward Struzik.

Struzik said that lightning ignites between a third to a half of the fires seen in Canada, but the majority of cases are human-caused.



Here is another one. Brian Pare has been arrested for causing numerous forest fires in Chibougamau, Quebec.



This article is in French and it states 75% of forest fires are caused by humans. I just attached a graph also in French.

One last thing censoring is something the far-left specializes in, tactics used by communist governments. They do it to push their political narrative. Just to give an example of this, not related to climate change.



The court rules that the Biden administration likely violated the first amendment. The ruling says media and tech giants were likely coerced to moderate content related to covid.
 

Attachments

  • thumbnail_Screenshot_20230911_004143_Signal.jpg
    thumbnail_Screenshot_20230911_004143_Signal.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 55
Last edited:

Mandouke

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2022
1,025
2,310
113
Many left-wingers and left-wing tabloids are twisting facts and spreading misinformation to cause climate alarmism to push their agenda just to add more taxes and more restrictions. Here are some facts for example forest fires. Majority of forest fires are caused by humans yet far-left wing tabloids and politicians are blaming it all on climate change. I posted about this.


Direct Quote from the Article:

Though it is not yet determined what exactly has caused a number of this year’s earlier-than-usual and more widespread wildfires, there are two common reasons wildfires begin.

Wildfires typically start either from lightning or from human activity, according to fire expert and Queen’s University fellow Edward Struzik.

Struzik said that lightning ignites between a third to a half of the fires seen in Canada, but the majority of cases are human-caused.



Here is another one. Brian Pare has been arrested for causing numerous forest fires in Chibougamau, Quebec.



This article is in French and it states 75% of forest fires are caused by humans. I just attached a graph also in French.

One last thing censoring is something the far-left specializes in, tactics used by communist governments. They do it to push their political narrative. Just to give an example of this, not related to climate change.



The court rules that the Biden administration likely violated the first amendment. The ruling says media and tech giants were likely coerced to moderate content related to covid.
That is well-documented and properly sourced material. Left and right-wing sources lend credence to your argument. Well done!
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLOUD 500

Jazzman1218

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2021
888
2,364
93
76
US sets a new record for billion-dollar weather disasters in a year. With 4 months to go, there have been 23 such events eclipsing the previous record of 22 in 2020. This count does not include TS Hillary damage to California or the deep drought in the South and Midwest as those costs are still being totaled. Adam Smith, NOAA climatologist and economist, stated "We're seeing the fingerprints of climate change all over our nation".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2fast2slow and gaby

Jazzman1218

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2021
888
2,364
93
76
Recent devastating floods in Vermont and now in Massachusetts are alarming. Heavy rain and flooding occur naturally, but the growing frequency and intensity of storms are a direct result of human-caused climate change. Burning fossil fuels emits carbon dioxide into the atmosphere where it builds up and traps heat. A warmer ocean causes more water to evaporate into the air. Warmer air holds more water resulting in heavier rain. It's not too late to act, and act we must! We can choose to live with intensifying climate damage out of ignorance, greed, complacency, or despair, or we can choose to work toward a better future that is not yet out of reach.
 

Chouin95

Strong as a bear. Swift as a deer.
Sep 22, 2020
324
446
63
38
The main reasons why the Liberals are pushing the climate change agenda, it’s not about the planet and it’s not about the people, it’s about gaining every bit of control they can get over the population.
That said population is growing fast so it means the roughnecks have to drill more oil out of the ground so that the farmers can grow more food, the truckers can deliver more products and carpenters like me, can build more houses.
Soy milk and paper straws won’t lead us toward a better future.
53ED1D16-74F7-44BA-8C52-78074E618DAE.jpeg
 

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
7,112
4,061
113
The main reasons why the Liberals are pushing the climate change agenda, it’s not about the planet and it’s not about the people, it’s about gaining every bit of control they can get over the population.
It was not just about control either, it was about money. As for climate change, the far-left answer is always more taxes. Think how much money the government made off carbon taxes alone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chouin95

Mandouke

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2022
1,025
2,310
113
Canadians see where the carbon tax has left them in terms of climate change. Not a thing has changed with the climate, but Canadians are wide awake and understand that their wallets are hurting big time. One need look no further than the current polls and the paranoid reaction of the current Liberal government. They realize that their past eight years of climate change work are about to go up in smoke(no pun intended) and the whole climate agenda, carbon tax and bought and paid-for climate science studies are being exposed for what they are.

Is that a conspiracy theory or climate science?

It is the truth and Canadians will decide whether they want to be taxed to hell and back ostensibly for the climate or not. They will do that en masse during the next general election and if the polls are correct, there will be a massive reset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLOUD 500

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
7,112
4,061
113
Fortunately, the vast majority of us believe in climate science and not in conspiracy theories.
I looked for climate science but I just could not find it, follow the money trail and I found something, a sneaky business being runned by the far-left. Taxes do not change the climate, there is no science in taxes but this is definitely a con game being runned by the government kind of like what a con man does to steal money in a sneaky way. The carbon tax is a revenue collecting scheme and fortunately many people are waking up to that especially when everything is costing a lot more these days. I posted many facts to debunk your theory.


Here is a link to the government of Canada website, this is their data btw.. As per the graph there has been no significant decrease in carbon emissions since 2015. The only thing that happened is that we have more taxes and more restrictions. The government is making the big bucks of this climate change scam.
 
Last edited:

Jazzman1218

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2021
888
2,364
93
76
Canadians see where the carbon tax has left them in terms of climate change. Not a thing has changed with the climate, but Canadians are wide awake and understand that their wallets are hurting big time. One need look no further than the current polls and the paranoid reaction of the current Liberal government. They realize that their past eight years of climate change work are about to go up in smoke(no pun intended) and the whole climate agenda, carbon tax and bought and paid-for climate science studies are being exposed for what they are.

Is that a conspiracy theory or climate science?

It is the truth and Canadians will decide whether they want to be taxed to hell and back ostensibly for the climate or not. They will do that en masse during the next general election and if the polls are correct, there will be a massive reset.
No, not a conspiracy theory or climate science. Your position is just short-sighted and selfish.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts