Classy Angel
Montreal Escorts

Climate change

nothinghere

Well-Known Member
Mar 22, 2022
532
426
63
57
There is the popular DEW theory.
This is very concerning.
I watched a video last year from a very popular science fanatic.
In the video was bought a 2000 watt infrared laser device from Chinese Alibaba.
Incredible utility but the guy in the video Converted the output to as he called "Directed Energy Device"
DEW is the same thing but the "W" is for weapon as opposed to a device.
Calling it a weapon would have gotten the video banned.
He even makes a comment about California "Where just looking at the forest will start a fire" omg bwahaha

Styropyro Laser device

The above is what a handy private citizen can put together.
What major military contractors have now be sure is mindboggling.
But like the nuclear bomb Manhattan project we will only know once we know.
I read 2000+ nuclear bombs already blown up in space, underground, above ground, in ocean, etc.
There was no concern for the environment they don't give a sh1t.

Even more concerning are these "Dragon drones"
Video below from CNN that did not age well given present circumstances.

CNN Dragon drones
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: Valentina Amante

Valentina Amante

ᴍᴀᴋᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴏɴ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴏɴ ᴀɢᴀɪɴ
Sep 28, 2023
1,086
2,996
113
Terrebonne
www.valentinaamante.com
Sleepy Joe just announced a cute lil check of $770 for the “wildfire” victims in LA.


LA’s population is of 3.30 million
$3,300,000 X $770 = $2,541,000,000 (billion).

To give you a little perspective; to date, the USA has sent 175 billion dollars to Ukraine.



IMG_1111.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Fradi and Thane

minutemenX

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2015
1,044
1,180
113
around
Sleepy Joe just announced a cute lil check of $770 for the “wildfire” victims in LA.


LA’s population is of 3.30 million
$3,300,000 X $770 = $2,541,000,000 (billion).

To give you a little perspective; to date, the USA has sent 175 billion dollars to Ukraine.

Yes, $770 is pathetic. The rent for a small house or some average apartment in LA is now well above $10K/month. People left on the street without literally nothing. Not everybody has $10M in the bank. Government must bring military and industry and rise cheap temporary housing ASAP.

But to be fare , Ukraine does not cost that much. From $170B, at least $100B were spent inside the country to manufacture new military stuff whereas old and slated soon for replacement was sent to Ukraine. But this was at least for a just cause. How about this: USA left last year over $10B of some modern military equipment as a present to our Taliban “friends”.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Valentina Amante

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,334
1,280
113
Casablanca
I like the state of California. It has a wonderful climate, some great cities and natural wonders and lots of beautiful women. I have been to California several times for both vacation and work and always enjoyed it. But it is also an extremely liberal state, mostly controlled by leftists for decades. I don't directly blame Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass for the devastating wildfires but I do blame the leftwing political culture of the state for the many stupid decisions made over decades that inevitably resulted in a tragic wildfire. A columnist for the Wall Street Journal provides a concise summary of some of the bad decisions made over the years by California's leftwing leadership.


How the Left Turned California Into a Paradise Lost
Gavin Newsom promised to ‘Trump-proof’ the Golden State. If only he’d fireproofed it instead.​


After the November election, California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced his plans to “Trump-proof” the Golden State. How about fire-proofing? Los Angeles’s horrific fires are exposing the costs of its progressive follies, which even wealthy liberals in their Palisades palaces can’t escape.

Start with its environmental obsessions.
The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power in 2019 sought to widen a fire-access road and replace old wooden utility poles in the Topanga Canyon abutting the Palisades with steel ones to make power lines fire- and wind-resistant. In the process, crews removed an estimated 182 Braunton’s milkvetch plants, an endangered species.

The utility halted the project as state officials investigated the plant destruction. More than a year later, the California Coastal Commission issued a cease-and-desist order, fined the utility $2 million, and required “mitigation” for the project’s impact on the species. This involved replacing “nonnative” vegetation with plants native to the state. You have to chuckle at the contradiction: California’s progressives want to expel foreign flora and fauna but provide a sanctuary for illegal immigrants.
Since the milkvetch requires wildfires to propagate, the only way to boost its numbers is to let the land burn. A cynic might wonder if environmentalists interfered with fire prevention in hope of evicting humans from what they view as the plant’s rightful habitat. To radical environmentalists, every human is a colonizer.

Next, consider the government’s misallocation of resources. Los Angeles Fire Chief Kristin Crowley complains the city cut her budget by $17 million last spring, which she says reduced overtime compensation and interfered with wildfire preparation. Maybe, though the veteran firefighter may also be saying this to get more money for her department.

In truth, the fire budget didn’t shrink since city leaders last autumn approved a new union contract that boosted pay and benefits by $76 million—about $20,000 per firefighter. Even before this raise, firefighters on average earned about $200,000, plus $90,000 in benefits. Many can retire at 55 with pensions equaling 90% of their final salaries.

Los Angeles spent $350 million this year on firefighter pensions and benefits. Much of that would have been better spent on fire prevention, which made up only 5% of the department’s budget. Ms. Crowley calls “diversity, inclusion, and equity” a top priority, and the Fire Department boasted nine DEI positions.

Bloated union contracts and DEI may not have directly hampered the fire response, but they illustrate the government’s wrongheaded priorities. It’s the same with water. Donald Trump blamed dry fire hydrants in L.A. on protections for the delta smelt fish. The real culprit was an overwhelmed water system, but both reflect government mismanagement.

Smelt protections restrict the amount of water that flows from the state’s north to the south. This has led to billions of gallons of water being flushed out to the Pacific Ocean each year, along with chronic water shortages, high unemployment, overpumped wells and environmental degradation in the state’s Central Valley. Mr. Newsom opposed Mr. Trump’s first-term efforts to ease the fish protections. You can lead California progressives to water, but you can’t make them think.

Consider the state’s response to crime and homelessness, which may have contributed to the fires. Last year’s Park Fire—the fourth largest in state history—was allegedly ignited by a man with two prior felony convictions who was on parole for a DUI. The Los Angeles Times reported in early 2021 that 24 fires on average were breaking out each day in the city’s homeless encampments. A fire in an encampment shut down an L.A. freeway last November, the second time that had happened in a little over a year.

Good Samaritans on Thursday detained a homeless man who they said used a flamethrower to incinerate Christmas trees and garbage cans, around the same time as a major fire erupted. Police arrested the vagrant on a felony probation violation—meaning he had been on parole for another felony—because they said they lacked probable cause to charge him with arson. The suspect reportedly claimed he was using a blowtorch to smoke marijuana.

Wealthy liberals have long been shielded from the consequences of their government’s blunders. State regulators until recently even suppressed insurance rates for high-priced homes by barring insurers from fully pricing in wildfire risk and reinsurance costs.

Like King Canute, who tried to command the tides, Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara on Thursday prohibited insurers from dropping homeowners in areas affected by the fires. People who lose their homes deserve sympathy. But if insurers aren’t allowed to limit their liabilities or adjust premiums based on risk, they will instead raise rates on everyone.

Democrats think they can wave away economic reality, much as they do when they pretend there are no costs to raising the minimum wage or taxes. Will the fires prompt Mr. Newsom and company to rethink their delusions? Forget it, it’s La La Land.
 
Last edited:

Valentina Amante

ᴍᴀᴋᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴏɴ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴏɴ ᴀɢᴀɪɴ
Sep 28, 2023
1,086
2,996
113
Terrebonne
www.valentinaamante.com
But it is also an extremely liberal state, mostly controlled by leftists for decades. I don't directly blame Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass for the devastating wildfires but I do blame the leftwing political culture of the state for the many stupid decisions made over decades that inevitably resulted in a tragic wildfire.

Again, I’m not right nor left.
I’m front n centre, just like my tits.

This is why they create issues like the “unpreparedness” of the “wildfires” lmao…. To give you an ILLUSION OF CHOICE and make people PICK SIDES
such as the LEFT in this case to “blame”.

When in reality… THERE’S NO SIDE. They’re fooling everyone.

People don’t realize that there’s indeed a bigger agenda. Which is Agenda 2030. It’s not conspiracy. Look it up with the links me and @nothinghere provided in our previous posts on this thread.

With this agenda, be prepared to kiss your AAA steak and pork roast goodbye - instead, you will eat zi bugs. Because apparently cow farts are destroying the ozone layer LMFAO.

I wonder if there’s a hole in the ozone layer above my house because my farts can be wild. Maybe I should identify as a cow also since I can provide milk and love to eat.

Kiss your gas and diesel car goodbye too - say hello to a digital world filled with social credit and 24/7 surveillance and control… And if you ever J-walk, just like in China, you will be punished, fined AND/OR have your electronics cut off.
That’s what a SMART CITY is.
It’s a cute lil name they give it to make it seem ATTRACTIVE and CONVENIENT to everyone - when in the end it’s a distraction filled with lies.
They’re already moving in with the SmartLA2028 plans - Newscum just vaguely announced it.

They CREATE DISTRACTIONS under the guise of CLIMATE CHANGE BULLSHIT in order to get to this point. CONVID was a major part of the beginning to control over the masses. (Even if they already have been controlling us for years).
That’s what people don’t understand. These are all paid actors who are in on it that ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN.


✨It’s all by design✨

✨It’s all by design✨

✨It’s all by design✨

I will repeat this even while sucking cock.

Using DEl, empty reservoirs, blocked firetrucks, paid arsonists, cancelled fire policies, train being built coinciding with the NEW SMART CITY they're building... SmartLA2028

Not to mention how all these “wildfires” conveniently burnt down all evidence of celebrities & politicians who are linked to child trafficking; child S*x abuse, child abduction / trafficking, snuff films, etc.
Also, there is a huge underground tunnel network in LA that facilitates said trafficking… but let’s overlook that too while we’re at it.

- Newscum is a great actor like all of them and now that they have the they/them DEI / LAFD to blame - no one will bat an eye. They create distractions everywhere. Now, they will have their new SMART CITY built from scratch.


✨SmartLA 2028✨
✨Agenda 2030✨
✨SmartLA 2028✨
✨Agenda 2030✨

You can add this to the list of things to say while I’m slangin’ wang. I’m very game.




IMG_1149.jpeg


The only “wildfire” there is - is in my ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thane

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,334
1,280
113
Casablanca
Canadian should thank Trump for forcing PM Carney to give up on insane climate policies that have hurt Canadians and had no impact on global climate.


TORONTO—As an executive and central banker, Mark Carney was a leading voice urging the business world to fight against climate change. As Canada’s prime minister, he is doing everything he can to pump more oil and gas.

Since taking office in March, Carney dismantled many green policies introduced by his predecessor, Justin Trudeau. He scrapped an unpopular consumer carbon tax, paused a 2035 electric-vehicle mandate and enacted a law giving his cabinet authority to override environmental rules for infrastructure projects like oil pipelines.

Now, he is fast-tracking approval of the expansion of a liquefied natural-gas export facility in Kitimat, British Columbia. The expanded plant, run by a Shell-led consortium, would become the world’s second-largest LNG exporter, shipping up to 28 million tons a year of the fossil fuel to Asia. Climate activists are dismayed, but the Canadian leader is undeterred.
“This will directly help transform our country into an energy superpower,” Carney said.
It is a refrain Canada’s leader has often used since he became prime minister. Already the world’s fourth-largest oil exporter and fifth-largest exporter of natural gas, Canada is leaning even harder into fossil fuels and reversing costly climate initiatives to offset the economic shock from President Trump’s tariff war.

“There’s never been a harder time to be prime minister of Canada,” said Gerald Butts, vice chairman of the Eurasia Group consulting firm, who acted as a strategic adviser to Carney during this year’s general election. “Reconciling the irreconcilable is the job at this stage in our history.”

Carney’s economic challenges are real and pressing. Canada’s economy—dependent on trade with the U.S.—shrank in the second quarter. The unemployment rate hit its highest level since 2016, excluding the Covid-19 lockdowns. Real-estate markets in major cities like Vancouver and Toronto are suffering from plunging prices and sales.

Meanwhile, Canada is backsliding on its carbon commitments. The country will almost certainly miss a 2030 target to cut emissions by 40% from 2005 levels, said the nonprofit Canadian Climate Institute. That jeopardizes Canada’s United Nations commitment for net-zero emissions by 2050.

The prime minister’s office, in an emailed statement, said the Canadian government would soon be announcing a “climate competitiveness strategy” focused on building a low-carbon economy.

“We are in a climate crisis, and Canadians want to see meaningful climate action to build a strong and clean economy,” the statement said.

That might not be enough for climate activists. “If you really understand climate deeply, you understand that the cheapest, best financial outcome is associated with the fastest possible action on climate,” said Adam Scott, director of Shift, a Toronto advocacy group that pushes pension plans to consider climate change when making investment decisions. Carney “is demonstrating he doesn’t really understand this issue.”

Carney’s policy reversals are striking because they contradict almost a decade of his climate advocacy, Scott said.

While he was governor of the Bank of England, Carney became the face of the global fight against climate change. His 2015 speech, “The Tragedy of the Horizon,” became a landmark in pushing the financial world to account for climate risk. He chastised government and business leaders for short-term thinking, instead of planning for the long-term threat of a warming planet.

He later became a U.N. climate envoy and co-founded the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, known as GFANZ, a coalition of banks, investors and insurers that pledged to consider carbon emissions when making lending and investing decisions. That alliance has since largely been abandoned by the financial institutions.

Today, domestic politics are complicating Carney’s decisions. He is wrestling with a growing secessionist movement in the oil-rich province of Alberta. The province’s leader, Danielle Smith, warns that more Albertans are pushing to leave Canada because they are fed up with what they see as Ottawa’s attempts to strangle the oil sands, a lucrative source of crude that is also regarded as being among the most environmentally unfriendly types of petroleum to extract. A referendum on secession could be held as soon as next year.

Further fueling Alberta’s frustration: Canada’s resource industries, especially oil and gas, have been the biggest drivers of Canadian economic growth. Economic activity for the mining and oil-and-gas sector grew 16.1% between 2020 and 2024, outpacing manufacturing growth of 6.3% and total gross domestic product growth of 14%.

Smith wants Ottawa to repeal or rework several of Trudeau’s climate-focused laws, including ones that limit emissions from oil and gas production, a ban on tankers off the coast of British Columbia that makes it harder for fuel to be shipped from the West Coast, and a law that imposes more rigorous environmental assessments on projects like oil pipelines.

Smith is pushing for a grand bargain with Carney, where oil-and-gas companies would invest in lowering emissions through projects like carbon capture in exchange for Canadian approval of new pipelines.

On Wednesday, Alberta said it would file an application next year for a new pipeline that would carry oil to Canada’s West Coast.

So far, provincial officials are “cautiously optimistic” about the direction of policy under Carney, said Brian Jean, Alberta’s minister of energy and minerals. He warned that his government needs to see even more movement from Carney.

“It’s about whether or not they have the will to push things through and to satisfy Alberta,” said Jean. “We for a long time have felt alienated.”
 
Ashley Madison