El Nino is known for long time and it doesn't explain the extreme temperatures and rainfalls in 2023 .
The international news show them almost daily.
I am old enough to to have witnesses those changes.
Climate change
- Thread starter Sol Tee Nutz
- Start date
El Nino is known for long time and it doesn't explain the extreme temperatures and rainfalls in 2023 .
The international news show them almost daily.
I am old enough to to have witnesses those changes.
This is an El Nino year which does have something to do with the weather, to argue it does not shows inability to accept more information than programed to.
Perhaps take the time to read this.
World Meteorological Organization declares onset of El Niño conditions
El Niño conditions have developed in the tropical Pacific for the first time in seven years, setting the stage for a likely surge in global temperatures and disruptive weather and climate patterns.
Last edited:
Looks like earth under Cat 5 storm attack!!
A first: Cat 5 storms have formed in every ocean basin this year...
"A combination of human-caused climate change and El Niño have heated ocean waters to record levels in 2023"
They always put "human caused" in every weather article like repetitive brainwashing.
I wish they just stick to empirical observation.
A first: Cat 5 storms have formed in every ocean basin this year...
"A combination of human-caused climate change and El Niño have heated ocean waters to record levels in 2023"
They always put "human caused" in every weather article like repetitive brainwashing.
I wish they just stick to empirical observation.
Here's an empirical observation: human-caused climate change is an inconvenient truth for some people.
Last edited:
This is very interesting pdf scan of 1969 global cooling.
Open
2010 global cooling declared a "Myth"
Statisticians: "Global Cooling" a Myth - CBS News
I remember global cooling in media panic even in 1980's
Yea all the 2000+ nuclear experimental bombs set off for testing.
Not to forget all the volcanos blowing up
The year without a summerNASA (.gov)
I think climate change is more Statistics than science.
Can they Statistically say climate change is 0.001% Human, 1%, 10%, 50% etc...
Yea I was brainwashed in 1980's high school days global cooling so I presently have cognitive dissonance.
Like above user post #1134:
"Since I was a young boy, I have been told one day that eggs are the best thing for me and that I should eat them regularly. The next day, I was told they were the worst thing I could eat and should not eat them"
So much dissonance I must bring up Lord Christopher Moncton.
He looks like Mr Bean hahaha
The media has destroyed his reputation even this week in Canada ????
CBC puts picture of the Lord to make him look like comedian crackpot.
Lord Christopher Monckton - CBC.ca
Sadly much has been erased from past 20 years of his battle for the UK
British Political Leader Says Obama Is 'Anti-England'CNBC
I am surprised he is still alive with a youtube channel.
Since he is a "Lord" maybe touchy if youtube deletes.
The Fraudulent Science of Global Warming, Climate Communist Scientists and much more. . .
Interesting old listen none the less hehe.
Edit add:
At 31:00 gets interesting. Lord is at odds with IPCC
1990 the concept of "Human caused climate changed" was introduced.
Lord was upset that only 64 out of 11944 published paper concluded "Human activity" responsible.
This actually was a messy situation. Lord was not crazy. 2014:
The claim of a 97% consensus on global warming does not stand up
Majority of scientific papers could not conclusively prove "Human caused climate change"..too many variables.
Left wing politics only accepted papers to fit their agenda.
Lord was referring to these IPCC intergovernmental organizations.
Climate Change: The IPCC 1990 and 1992 Assessments
World Development Report 2010 Development in a Changing Climate - IPCC
From 2010 IPCC pdf Objectives:
"To help convince the development community that climate change really does represent a changing climate for development, and that development, “the way we’ve always done it”, is not a good way forward."
If you watch youtube Lord Moncton from Canada a link will appear below video by UN Ministry of Climate Change.
Climate change ......creepy
One notable observation by Lord Moncton:
The Green movement calls Carbon Dioxide a pollution but Carbon Dioxide makes the plants Greener hehe nice one
Open
2010 global cooling declared a "Myth"
Statisticians: "Global Cooling" a Myth - CBS News
I remember global cooling in media panic even in 1980's
Yea all the 2000+ nuclear experimental bombs set off for testing.
Not to forget all the volcanos blowing up
The year without a summerNASA (.gov)
I think climate change is more Statistics than science.
Can they Statistically say climate change is 0.001% Human, 1%, 10%, 50% etc...
Yea I was brainwashed in 1980's high school days global cooling so I presently have cognitive dissonance.
Like above user post #1134:
"Since I was a young boy, I have been told one day that eggs are the best thing for me and that I should eat them regularly. The next day, I was told they were the worst thing I could eat and should not eat them"
So much dissonance I must bring up Lord Christopher Moncton.
He looks like Mr Bean hahaha
The media has destroyed his reputation even this week in Canada ????
CBC puts picture of the Lord to make him look like comedian crackpot.
Lord Christopher Monckton - CBC.ca
Sadly much has been erased from past 20 years of his battle for the UK
British Political Leader Says Obama Is 'Anti-England'CNBC
I am surprised he is still alive with a youtube channel.
Since he is a "Lord" maybe touchy if youtube deletes.
The Fraudulent Science of Global Warming, Climate Communist Scientists and much more. . .
Interesting old listen none the less hehe.
Edit add:
At 31:00 gets interesting. Lord is at odds with IPCC
1990 the concept of "Human caused climate changed" was introduced.
Lord was upset that only 64 out of 11944 published paper concluded "Human activity" responsible.
This actually was a messy situation. Lord was not crazy. 2014:
The claim of a 97% consensus on global warming does not stand up
Majority of scientific papers could not conclusively prove "Human caused climate change"..too many variables.
Left wing politics only accepted papers to fit their agenda.
Lord was referring to these IPCC intergovernmental organizations.
Climate Change: The IPCC 1990 and 1992 Assessments
World Development Report 2010 Development in a Changing Climate - IPCC
From 2010 IPCC pdf Objectives:
"To help convince the development community that climate change really does represent a changing climate for development, and that development, “the way we’ve always done it”, is not a good way forward."
If you watch youtube Lord Moncton from Canada a link will appear below video by UN Ministry of Climate Change.
Climate change ......creepy
One notable observation by Lord Moncton:
The Green movement calls Carbon Dioxide a pollution but Carbon Dioxide makes the plants Greener hehe nice one
Last edited:
A decent read.
nypost.com
As a scientist, I’m not allowed to tell the full truth about climate change
What really should matter isn’t citations for the journals, clicks for the media, or career status for the academics — but research that actually helps society.
nypost.com
Wow!! NY Post Knocked it good!!
That article was a seamless transition from Lord Christopher Moncton's battle with academia in my above post.
But so many years later.
Is this the Lord's work??
"And the editors of these journals have made it abundantly clear, both by what they publish and what they reject, that they want climate papers that support certain pre-approved narratives"
"Customized research"
This is Exactly what the Lord Christopher Moncton my above post was fighting IPCC for:
"They select what gets published from a large pool of entries".... as NY post mentions
Select what gets published for the Exact stated 2010 IPCC Objective!!
As I put in above post to repeat:
"To help convince the development community that climate change really does represent a changing climate for development, and that development, “the way we’ve always done it”, is not a good way forward."
I will add NY Post to my feed and subscribe for sure.
Trudeau Bill C-18 CBC Communist Broadcasing Canada won't parrot this NY Post article for sure!
I repost CBC article of Lord Christopher Moncton just for fun.
NY Post is far superior than this spoof below:
Lord Christopher Monckton - CBC
I think CBC block their own interview I cannot play haha
From CBC introduction:
"Well apparently, a few years ago, Monckton was recovering from an illness, and to pass the time, he decided to get into the science of climate change"
Yea I call this CBC technique "Straw man Gaslighting"
Twilight Zone stuff!
Last edited:
First, the NY Post is a right-wing tabloid with extremely low journalistic standards. Second, Patrick T Brown is a known climate change skeptic. He claims to have omitted scientific data to get published and now he's being a "whistle-blower" on himself. He has no more credibility than does the Post. It's all garbage in support of a climate change denying right-wing agenda.A decent read.
As a scientist, I’m not allowed to tell the full truth about climate change
What really should matter isn’t citations for the journals, clicks for the media, or career status for the academics — but research that actually helps society.
Last edited:
I read that article. Patrick T. Brown didn't deny climate changes, he expressed reserves on the direct links with forest fires in 2023 spring and summer.
Using that article to deny climate changes is a somewhat disonest or non informed twist of the truth.
Many left-wingers and left-wing tabloids are twisting facts and spreading misinformation to cause climate alarmism to push their agenda just to add more taxes and more restrictions. Here are some facts for example forest fires. Majority of forest fires are caused by humans yet far-left wing tabloids and politicians are blaming it all on climate change. I posted about this.
What causes most wildfires in Canada, and why we’re ‘primed’ for a lot more | Globalnews.ca
Though it is not yet determined what caused a number of this year's earlier-than-usual and more widespread wildfires, there are two common reasons wildfires begin.
globalnews.ca
Direct Quote from the Article:
Though it is not yet determined what exactly has caused a number of this year’s earlier-than-usual and more widespread wildfires, there are two common reasons wildfires begin.
Wildfires typically start either from lightning or from human activity, according to fire expert and Queen’s University fellow Edward Struzik.
Struzik said that lightning ignites between a third to a half of the fires seen in Canada, but the majority of cases are human-caused.
Here is another one. Brian Pare has been arrested for causing numerous forest fires in Chibougamau, Quebec.
Feu de forêt
Conseils de prévention et règles de sécurité en cas de feu de forêt. Informez-vous sur les précautions à prendre.
mffp.gouv.qc.ca
This article is in French and it states 75% of forest fires are caused by humans. I just attached a graph also in French.
One last thing censoring is something the far-left specializes in, tactics used by communist governments. They do it to push their political narrative. Just to give an example of this, not related to climate change.
Biden officials ‘likely violated First Amendment’ in Big Tech COVID censorship efforts, appeals court affirms
A bombshell district court order that barred several Biden administration officials and agencies from communicating with social media companies has been narrowed by a federal appeals court.
nypost.com
Biden administration coerced social media giants into possible free speech violations: court
The White House may have violated First Amendment rights by pressuring tech companies to suppress or remove posts, 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled.
www.usatoday.com
The court rules that the Biden administration likely violated the first amendment. The ruling says media and tech giants were likely coerced to moderate content related to covid.
Attachments
-
thumbnail_Screenshot_20230911_004143_Signal.jpg
Last edited:
That is well-documented and properly sourced material. Left and right-wing sources lend credence to your argument. Well done!Many left-wingers and left-wing tabloids are twisting facts and spreading misinformation to cause climate alarmism to push their agenda just to add more taxes and more restrictions. Here are some facts for example forest fires. Majority of forest fires are caused by humans yet far-left wing tabloids and politicians are blaming it all on climate change. I posted about this.
What causes most wildfires in Canada, and why we’re ‘primed’ for a lot more | Globalnews.ca
Though it is not yet determined what caused a number of this year's earlier-than-usual and more widespread wildfires, there are two common reasons wildfires begin.
Direct Quote from the Article:
Though it is not yet determined what exactly has caused a number of this year’s earlier-than-usual and more widespread wildfires, there are two common reasons wildfires begin.
Wildfires typically start either from lightning or from human activity, according to fire expert and Queen’s University fellow Edward Struzik.
Struzik said that lightning ignites between a third to a half of the fires seen in Canada, but the majority of cases are human-caused.
Here is another one. Brian Pare has been arrested for causing numerous forest fires in Chibougamau, Quebec.
Feu de forêt
Conseils de prévention et règles de sécurité en cas de feu de forêt. Informez-vous sur les précautions à prendre.
This article is in French and it states 75% of forest fires are caused by humans. I just attached a graph also in French.
One last thing censoring is something the far-left specializes in, tactics used by communist governments. They do it to push their political narrative. Just to give an example of this, not related to climate change.
Biden officials ‘likely violated First Amendment’ in Big Tech COVID censorship efforts, appeals court affirms
A bombshell district court order that barred several Biden administration officials and agencies from communicating with social media companies has been narrowed by a federal appeals court.
Biden administration coerced social media giants into possible free speech violations: court
The White House may have violated First Amendment rights by pressuring tech companies to suppress or remove posts, 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled.
The court rules that the Biden administration likely violated the first amendment. The ruling says media and tech giants were likely coerced to moderate content related to covid.
US sets a new record for billion-dollar weather disasters in a year. With 4 months to go, there have been 23 such events eclipsing the previous record of 22 in 2020. This count does not include TS Hillary damage to California or the deep drought in the South and Midwest as those costs are still being totaled. Adam Smith, NOAA climatologist and economist, stated "We're seeing the fingerprints of climate change all over our nation".
Note this is an El Nino year plus should be expected to get warmer with the added population plus as always after an ice age it does get warmer.
News in today.
Sun activity accelerating into solar cycle.
Peak solar activity is arriving sooner than expected ...Sciencehttps://www.science.org
Sun activity accelerating into solar cycle.
Peak solar activity is arriving sooner than expected ...Sciencehttps://www.science.org
Peak solar activity is arriving sooner than expected, reaching levels not seen in 20 years
Science.org is good peer reviewed source for info.
Recent devastating floods in Vermont and now in Massachusetts are alarming. Heavy rain and flooding occur naturally, but the growing frequency and intensity of storms are a direct result of human-caused climate change. Burning fossil fuels emits carbon dioxide into the atmosphere where it builds up and traps heat. A warmer ocean causes more water to evaporate into the air. Warmer air holds more water resulting in heavier rain. It's not too late to act, and act we must! We can choose to live with intensifying climate damage out of ignorance, greed, complacency, or despair, or we can choose to work toward a better future that is not yet out of reach.
The main reasons why the Liberals are pushing the climate change agenda, it’s not about the planet and it’s not about the people, it’s about gaining every bit of control they can get over the population.
That said population is growing fast so it means the roughnecks have to drill more oil out of the ground so that the farmers can grow more food, the truckers can deliver more products and carpenters like me, can build more houses.
Soy milk and paper straws won’t lead us toward a better future.
That said population is growing fast so it means the roughnecks have to drill more oil out of the ground so that the farmers can grow more food, the truckers can deliver more products and carpenters like me, can build more houses.
Soy milk and paper straws won’t lead us toward a better future.
It was not just about control either, it was about money. As for climate change, the far-left answer is always more taxes. Think how much money the government made off carbon taxes alone.
Fortunately, the vast majority of us believe in climate science and not in conspiracy theories.
Canadians see where the carbon tax has left them in terms of climate change. Not a thing has changed with the climate, but Canadians are wide awake and understand that their wallets are hurting big time. One need look no further than the current polls and the paranoid reaction of the current Liberal government. They realize that their past eight years of climate change work are about to go up in smoke(no pun intended) and the whole climate agenda, carbon tax and bought and paid-for climate science studies are being exposed for what they are.
Is that a conspiracy theory or climate science?
It is the truth and Canadians will decide whether they want to be taxed to hell and back ostensibly for the climate or not. They will do that en masse during the next general election and if the polls are correct, there will be a massive reset.
Is that a conspiracy theory or climate science?
It is the truth and Canadians will decide whether they want to be taxed to hell and back ostensibly for the climate or not. They will do that en masse during the next general election and if the polls are correct, there will be a massive reset.
I looked for climate science but I just could not find it, follow the money trail and I found something, a sneaky business being runned by the far-left. Taxes do not change the climate, there is no science in taxes but this is definitely a con game being runned by the government kind of like what a con man does to steal money in a sneaky way. The carbon tax is a revenue collecting scheme and fortunately many people are waking up to that especially when everything is costing a lot more these days. I posted many facts to debunk your theory.
Greenhouse gas emissions - Canada.ca
Climate change is one of the most important environmental issues of our time. Climate change is caused by the increase in concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. These increases are primarily due to human activities such as the use of fossil fuels or agriculture. The indicators...
Here is a link to the government of Canada website, this is their data btw.. As per the graph there has been no significant decrease in carbon emissions since 2015. The only thing that happened is that we have more taxes and more restrictions. The government is making the big bucks of this climate change scam.
Last edited:
Similar threads
