Since you are a lawyer, EB, your statement leads me to a question. At one known place in NYC, as you can read constantly on another board, they have the LE check where the girl does a free for 15 seconds in the foyer before entering the front door. She asks before she proceeds. If he does not comply, she does not do the deed and she goes back thru the door not allowing him in.
So if the guy is a cop, what`s to stop him from obtaining a search warrant and raiding the place?
It`s for the reasons Merlot already alluded to and which my post alluded to, setting up an entrapment defense. I am no expert in criminal law but my recollection from my evidence class is that there would then be a ``fruit from the poisonous tree`` defense as to any evidence yielded by a subsequent search pursuant to a warrant. That is why they do the free 15 second in NYC and the free tit or pussy grope in Boston. Vice cops work with prosecutors, and prosecutors do not want them behaving in ways that will fuck up a prosecution. This is common sense. I have seen criminal murder trials where cops were cross examined about all manner of fuckups and violations of police department protocols in investigating a crime. Good criminal defense attorneys will know the Vice Squad policy manual backwards, forwards and sideways. I have seen cross examination in court on cops who were made to look dumber than negative 200 IQ by really good criminal defense attorneys.
In the USA, guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt and reasonable doubt is very easy to create if someone comes into court and says that a cop was a willing participant in, or else initiated the illegal activity. You would also have to look at the elements of the offense charged and see whether any of them might be negated by a cop engaging in this behavior. Because of the existence and developing sophistication of videotaping ability in electronic devices that are cheap and can easily be hidden, more and more prosecutions are getting hampered because the cop is shown doing something he/she should not have been doing. We don`t know whether Lisa has secret security videocams in her Spa, and it would not be in her best interests to reveal that on this board. I am thinking most Spas probably do have security cameras for this reason, and to monitor what is going on with the ladies.
In civil practice, more and more accidents and incidents are being captured on video. I have had several cases where motor vehicle accidents in gas stations were captured on video as well shoplifting incidents in department stores. Note that the CraigsList Killer who committed suicide was ID`d and caught because he was caught on video leaving the hotel.
My post was meant to assist Lisa in thinking about ways to screen for LE. However, I do not know what Montreal LE can and cannot do during an investigation that could subsequently jeopardize the investigation. Some of the prior posts are very unhelpful as they offer speculation that is not really applicable involving wayward cops who were laughed out of court, or else involved off duty cops. Nobody has posted any meaningful response to the question of what Montreal LE can and cannot do during an investigation should Lisa choose to screen by allowing a free grope of her tits or pussy, or a 15 second . I think Lisa would assume that the cop will behave professionally and legally and the question is, what does that mean in Montreal?
BTW I wonder what happens if someone prematurely ejaculates during the 15 second free in NYC? I suppose it is on the house?
