full disclosure: here we go..

[Garotalover]

"No one can give you better sex than your GF" LOL Tell that to my Ex-GF. She thought that because she wouldn't let me DATY her that she therefore didn't have to provide BJ to me. Nothing is free - especially from a GF. I agree with EB that RB sounded like a funny and smooth BSer and was able to get some free services with his abilities. But, in the end he comes off like a lost soul.

 

[jalimon]

Hmm. That is part of the story but not the whole one. On the other extreme part of the spectrum SPs can smell a sucker from a mile away. A sucker is a naive individual who completely lacks swagg, lacks confidence, and is not assertive the least bit. So he throws money around easily and thinks women will love him or give better because he is giving money easily. Sex workers take advantage of clients like this because they are simply suckers. Suckers get least service and pay top dollars. Sex workers love suckers since they are easy clients. I seen it all the time at stripclubs. I meet some Merbites here and really some are so shy and got zero confidence. When a stripper overcounts she does not do it at random she picks the suckers the shy ones who got no confidence. If you are a mugger you are going to pick the loan weak one. That is common sense. All strippers have taken advantage of a client at one point granted some are con artists but if she gets a slick swagg client that will not work on him. Same principal with anything in life including SPs.

I know I will be shot down for this but I said it many times that paying upfront is stupid especially to SPs with no reviews. Once she gets her money you got absolutely no assurance that you will get what you were promised. This applies to SPs with no reviews and no rep that is non Merb SPs. And about paying more you do not get better the best things in life are free and no one can give you better sex then your GF. Based on my personal experience that I had with stripper take outs with, I had my best sessions with the girls I paid the least money with and my worst sessions were the ones I paid the most for. So there is no direct correlation between paying more and getting better service. This is human relations not a thing or product you are purchasing. Those higher priced service providers are just much better at selling themselves and marketing. They usually got very high end websites with clever introductions. Being smart with your money does not make you a cheapass but throwing your money around makes you a sucker. However there are some very few who do have a lot of money and that amount is pocket change to them. Just be realistic with your finances.

I cannot call this a hobby because it definitely is anything but a hobby. It is a need whether it be sex, emotional, or anything else that has been commercialized. Let us be honest here. Anyone can write whatever they want behind a keyboard who knows the truth.

It's definately not a hobby. I once had a girl stole 100 euro in my jeans at the end of a session in amsterdam, she then looked right into my eyes and said: "What the fuck are you going to do hey? Fight me? Report me to the police? You have no leverage, just get out, next!". Men did I ever learned a lot that day about about life in general! The best or worst girl I ever saw did not care a fuck about review, for different reason. The worst will just continue to exploit whoever keeps coming to see them and maximize their cash and the best simply have the confidence in themselve about what they do, which will evantually bring the good review. Now I simply take it as a privilege that girls accept to have sex with me, even for money, good or bad. It's a privilege, hope for the best, do not expect more, it's the girls decision

Cheers,

 

[AmberRose]

Just as a followup to the last post: if in fact as posted by the Mods Ricky Bonds was getting freebies for reviews, he got those freebies because he likely has persuasive verbal communications skills and other talents (looks, body language) talking to the girls that most guys do not possess. I never met Ricky, but from his posts, I sense an ability to talk smoothly with women. Many guys I have seen, at VIP events and such, freeze up with the girl. I can recall one MERBiste in particular who at a party, when a certain SP walked into the room, spoke to me of his immense fear in trying to approach her and talk to her. Women read these body language cues; they are attracted to confident and intelligent men. If all else is equal in looks and hygiene, the guy who gets a better mileage or service is one whose presence is comfortable to the SP, and who also projects confidence. My best guess is that Ricky, if he did rack up sessions that were freebies, possessed these talents and skills in spades. Whether he told the girls he was opening an MP in Laval or was the son of the Molson family doesn't really matter. He was a persuader and one must have the verbal skills, the intelligence and the body language to pull it off. Very few true cheapass guys have any real combination of those talents. The execution and art of persuading women to have sex for free is not easy and it's like a football or hockey team performing at a high level, there must be great execution on each play. Not everyone can do it- in fact, very few guys can. It is easy for rich guys to get women, but at the working class level these other skills are paramount.

I have to kind of disagree.. more so because I know of a few guys on another board who got freebies from girls who are ridiculously popular these days because the girls were new, didn't know what they were doing and the guys took advantage of this and offered them good reviews and other help in exchange for free sessions. None of these guys could be considered smooth talkers, confident or super good-looking, they just knew how to be good manipulators.

 

[UncleBob]

Ricky talks nicely, Ricky talks a lot, and today Ricky understand that he talks too much...

 

[brock landers]

Ricky talks nicely, Ricky talks a lot, and today Ricky understand that he talks too much...

What a spot on summary. I believe he's a pathological liar, and always had my doubts about anything he ever posted here. His 2015 summary struck me as "fiction can be fun" and solidified what I previously thought

 

[CLOUD 500]

smooth talkers, confident or super good-looking, they just knew how to be good manipulators.

Smooth talker and good manipulator goes hand in hand. You cannot be a good manipulator unless you are a smooth talker. As for good looking all con artists present themselves to look good... clothes, hairstyle, etc.. Would you be more inclined to buy a car from a sloppy salesman dressed in sweats and running shoes or a well dress salesman wearing a suit and well trimmed hair? Who would you take more seriously? And con artists may not be confident but they know how to look confident no one can ever be 100% confident. At the end this is like sales it is about convincing someone who can say no to say yes. Only difference that con artists have malevolent intentions.

 

[EagerBeaver]

Smooth talker and good manipulator goes hand in hand. .

Exactly. Amber Rose was saying the same thing as me and agreeing with me. It's called taking advantage of girls newer to the business who do not yet understand that they there are giving away something that is valuable in exchange for nothing- smooth talk and promises. These guys ALWAYS hone in on vulnerable younger and newer girls as their targets and never on older/wiser indies. This goes without saying or should. What sounds smooth to a young naive girl doesn't to a more mature indy.

Since RB joined the board I became instantly suspicious of him. The tone of his posts with a strong self glorifying touch led me to avoid reading him and giving him any attention.

Ditto here. I actually did not read any of RB posts or reviews until his "year end review" thread, and I only read that to see if would make any mention of the VIP4 no show debacle which I had heard about. I was assuming he wasn't going to mention it and my intention was post to remind him. Instead he posted about it and apologized. But it seemed to me the apology was not really the point of the post. The point of the post was "I am Ricky Bonds, and I was deemed important and credible enough to get invited to VIP4, an invitation-only event staged by MERB members. And oops I didn't actually go! but I said sorry nicely and how good am I?" As I posted earlier, I was outraged by the post, first because this RB pleaded for an invitation and Iggy works so hard and counts on invitees honoring their word that they will come, and secondly the post just had a significant self-glorifying aspect to it over an event (a no show at a party) that most people would just shut up about and say they are sorry privately.

 

[smuler]

I am glad things worked for Sol and Cinderella

They stood their ground, and the truth came out

Be proud, the others that didn't believe him , or made fun on this thread...

And Panthere..it was nice of you to offer to help Cindy if needed..

i couldnt think of a better person :thumb:

Best Regards

Smuler

 

[smuler]

It's definately not a hobby. I once had a girl stole 100 euro in my jeans at the end of a session in amsterdam, she then looked right into my eyes and said: "What the fuck are you going to do hey? Fight me? Report me to the police? You have no leverage, just get out, next!". Men did I ever learned a lot that day about about life in general!

And who was this ?

Name and address ?

Best Regards

Smuler

 

[TigerWould]

No wonder RB didn't show up to the Merb party...

 

[SensualFlight]

Reviews for sessions however, RB proved Cinderella's claims were acts of jealousy, she got paid for "on the clock time". To make a false complaint is a tort.

And who led you to believe she would have made a false complaint? Nah... Don't tell me... RickyBond? LOL

 

[lgna69xxx]

Alyssa,

STN has explained all of this several times already, he wanted a honest review so when he got back into town, he would know, based on that honest review, if he would see Rebecca once again. Maybe her service or looks did change from his liking, he just wanted to know and like he also said, he wanted to know for sure that some fake review (i never did see it) was indeed made by someone with a grudge against the poor women and indeed was fake as it appears it was because she only has great reviews or at least i assume, i do not go to where she works and likely never will so i do not pay attention to her reviews, but was told her reveiws were all pretty good.

 

[johnybird]

Alyssa,

STN has explained all of this several times already, he wanted a honest review so when he got back into town, he would know, based on that honest review, if he would see Rebecca once again.

What I don't get is if he was going to spend the money anyway why not just see for himself?

I understand there was this one bad review (granted, I don't know how bad it was) but if her overall reviews were good why not just take the chance? He had nothing to lose, ok except for some time...I can find worse ways to waste my time, and if he's seen her before and enjoyed his time with her, wouldn't the odds be ever in his favour? (No Hunger Games pun intended )

 

[charmer_]

What I don't get is if he was going to spend the money anyway why not just see for himself?

I understand there was this one bad review (granted, I don't know how bad it was) but if her overall reviews were good why not just take the chance? He had nothing to lose, ok except for some time...I can find worse ways to waste my time, and if he's seen her before and enjoyed his time with her, wouldn't the odds be ever in his favour? (No Hunger Games pun intended )

Yeah exactly...plus he's seen her once already. How much could she possibly change since the last time he saw her?

 

[EagerBeaver]

What I don't get is if he was going to spend the money anyway why not just see for himself?

I am guessing it's because he is not a local is part of the reason, and rebuttal of a negative review by someone other than himself is the other, since he had already reviewed her. STN has already been criticized in this thread, and his own thread, not just by RB but by several SPs who have contended that Sol's behavior promotes dishonest reviewing tactics (I think Gabrielle's post in the other thread best captures some of the better criticism of Sol). I think he was well intended (even RB said this), but clearly naive. Regardless, this controversy started a very good discussion on a number of issues that go to the very core of a review board and the quality of information posted on a review board. STN has played a small role in a very important thread, IMHO.

 

[johnybird]

Thanks EB

My intention wasn't to criticize him though, I was just curious.

From what I'm understanding (and sorry if I'm wrong about this) is she had good reviews as well. I've seen SP's who have had both good and bad reviews in their threads, if the good outweigh the bad by a big amount then odds are you are going to enjoy your time with her.

I know his intentions were good, but I can't even imagine what this poor girl would be thinking if she read all this. Ok he wanted to get all this out in the open and I agree with you that it did start some good discussions and it exposed RB, but regardless, one of the biggest things that didn't sit well with me Is that he's naming who the girl was when it really wasn't relevant to the point he was trying to make.

 

[Lawless]

The one obvious question nobody asked is , What escort charges $150 ? Was this for a 1/2 hour session ?

Maybe STN can clarify what exactly did he pay for. I'm really scratching my head over this one.

 

[eroticthriller]

10$ for gas, but isn't she an incall?????

She is an indy who charges $140 an hour and I gave $10 for gas.

 

[Lawless]

She is an indy who charges $140 an hour and I gave $10 for gas.

OK, I see. Guessing its a 123 Indy, definitely not an Indy Companion Indy.

Cheers

 

[Lawless]

10$ for gas, but isn't she an incall?????

Ricky Bonds' Gas, eroticthriller..try to keep up.