According to the article, the main ring leader accused is a guy named "Sam".
I did see that. But honestly, I met Sam (offered him a dinner steak once) and did not recognize him at all from the pics. I think it`s a different Sam. Could be wrong.
According to the article, the main ring leader accused is a guy named "Sam".
Sorry I thought it was XO and not WT that you worked for as a booker for a short time. I am mixing up the agencies.Indeed i met him in parties, same with James (but at the time James was already a GG booker). Sam always appeared like a nice guy at said party and gave the impression he wanted to make a good agency for both SPs and clients. This is the feeling i had AT THE TIME. That said i would disagree with the last part. I wasn't "that close" to Sam. We met in parties and yes he always gave me great services during the XO early years, but thats as far as it got.
Some of the clients are defending XO so hard I wonder if they run or used to run an unethical agency.Personne ne met toutes les agences dans le même bateau. La majorité des gens parlent surtout de XO et de leurs expériences là-bas
Je comprends que tu veuilles défendre l’industrie, mais ça ne veut pas dire qu’il faut remettre en question ou minimiser ce que d’autres filles ont vécu.
Le problème dans ce thread, c’est justement que certaines expériences sont mises de côté simplement parce que d’autres ne les ont pas vues ou vécues.
Pourtant, des situations difficiles, ça arrive partout, j’en ai vécu moi-même dans plusieurs endroits (agressions, condom brisé, clients qui ne respectent pas, clients qui partent sans payer, client qui OD dans la chambre … et etc.), et malgré ça on devait continuer à travailler comme si de rien n’était.
Même quand un client partait avec l’argent après l’acte, il m’est arrivé de devoir quand même payer ma cut et ça, je l’ai vécu à plusieurs endroits.
Donc oui, toutes les agences ne sont pas pareilles, mais ignorer des expériences simplement parce qu’on ne les a pas vues, c’est exactement comme ça que certaines réalités restent invisibles.
Au final, personne n’a la vision complète, donc c’est important de laisser de la place à toutes les voix.
I am the problem.
To some extent I will always feel that I am using women by paying them and I am not 100% comfortable with the fact that they are half my age also.
I have children that age, would I want someone paying one of them to sleep with them , hell no.
There you have it, it is not so simple to be a client also.
i started a thread a week ago about the advertizements of "buying sexual services is illegal", the thread degraded into a flame war, then suddenly the thread was gone. No warning, no nothing. Honestly it must have become impossible to moderate this forum, too much volume, the mods must have to cut corners to survive lolBelieve it or not, this thread is moderated. I had asked a question to Cloud 500 and that reply is gone
I don’t necessarily disagree with you.why does this debate always come down to the same old tropes. If you are respectful, clean, polite, not too demanding (and a tip is always appreciated), it is a win-win. You are not "using" a woman. She made herself available, for a price, under certain conditions, and if you respect those conditions, she is happy. That is not the difinition of "using someone".
This is interesting. Now I'm curious.Believe it or not, this thread is moderated. I had asked a question to Cloud 500 and that reply is gone
Surely an unbiased opinion!Believe it or not, this thread is moderated. I had asked a question to Cloud 500 and that reply is gone
The OPI wonder what happened to the original poster. They dropped a bomb and fled the scene, never to be seen or heard from again.
The thread has become nothing more than a vehicle for the cast of characters on Merb to vent their rage and point fingers at one another. Entertainment at its finest and very informative about the character of many Merbites.
I am confident the original poster is sitting back with some popcorn and beer and enjoying the spectacle this thread has become.
Salut tout le monde, je pense qu’aucun propriétaire d’agence ne veut écrire parce que c’est un sujet délicat. Pour être dans le business depuis très longtemps, je peux vous dire qu’aucune fille n’est forcée de travailler dans les agences (du moins ceux que j’ai connus personnellement au fil des années). Les filles sont décident elles-mêmes leurs horaires. Elles décident la durée des pauses qu’elles veulent entre les clients et le nombre de clients qu’elles veulent voir. Que les filles veulent voir 3 clients ou 12 on respect leur choix. Si elles veulent une pause d’une heure au milieu du shift pour manger et relaxer, on le fait sans problème. Les filles décident également le nombre de jours qu’elles travaillent.
I would think most agency owners right now would be quite happy if this thread was closed.. Now, if you want to close this never-ending thread, it’s about time! Thank you.
What he seems to be saying is that most violence is perpetrated against independents, while agency girls are protected by the agency's internal security officer(s).Excellent (translated) post by an agency owner. English version:
As for violence against girls, the few cases I’ve heard of all ended up with the police (unfortunately, this mostly happens to independent workers). All the agencies have security on standby to intervene if there’s a problem.
That is a blatant lie. Women in this industry have experienced some kind of violence no matter what. At massage parlors I have been brutalized, stealthed, assaulted, stolen from, etc. Whether you are independent or working for an agency or parlor, unfortunately you will experience violence or you are at risk. I was assaulted repeatedly at a massage parlor I worked at. I was told later that these were clients nobody wanted to see. I have friends who have worked for agencies who experienced similar things.What he seems to be saying is that most violence is perpetrated against independents, while agency girls are protected by the agency's internal security officer(s).
That is the most fucked up dick move for employee orientation.
- But, they intentionnaly sent her a violent client as a first client, to "break her in". According to her, this is a well known and common practice in the industry



