Apparently that was a procedural requirement, as their rules require a nomination for every candidate who passed the delegate threshold.AOC nominates Bernie Sanders for the president:
Apparently that was a procedural requirement, as their rules require a nomination for every candidate who passed the delegate threshold.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...o-cortez-nominated-bernie-sanders/3398311001/
She was given only one minute for her remarks, Biden obviously did not make the cut.But, what I took away from the video was that she never even mentioned Biden and that is an unwritten rule.
He's the nominee, he deserves a mention, or at least that's my opinion. There is a lot a person can say in a minute. But that's how a clueless rookie congressman is expected to act.She was given only one minute for her remarks, Biden obviously did not make the cut.
She is clueless all right, but the way things stands now, it is Biden who should be courting AOC's followers, not the other way around.But that's how a clueless rookie congressman is expected to act.
STN,^^^^^ Sorry but find your response funny. If she was a male I would still say complete idiot.
Google AOC gaffs and fill your boots.
She just won her own primary, didn't she? Getting 75% of the votes or so. She may well be a total idiot, but if so, that's exactly what the people in her district are looking for and expecting of their representative.^^^^^ Sorry but find your response funny. If she was a male I would still say complete idiot.
Google AOC gaffs and fill your boots.
Why? Is there any flaw in my reasoning? My point is she is a politician, not a rocket scientist (I hope she's not), and so far a quite successful one. Who cares if she's smart or dumb? Her voters are happy and just voted to send her back to Congress, what else matters?^^^^^I can’t tell if your serious or not.
STN,
I think you need to check your sarcasm reader.
I doubt Miss Theresa is a huge fan of AOC.
Or maybe I am the one that misunderstood your post lol.
Why? Is there any flaw in my reasoning? My point is she is a politician, not a rocket scientist (I hope she's not), and so far a quite successful one. Who cares if she's smart or dumb? Her voters are happy and just voted to send her back to Congress, what else matters?
I think she was counting on the majority of the voters being in one of those categories as well.Who cares if she's smart or dumb?
I am not sure if she was really "counting" on anything or just winged it on pure intuition. Amounts to the same thing really. 75% of the vote is beyond impressive, isn't it? This is Lukashenko territory, if not (yet) Kim Jong-un. That is what I judge her "success" on, not her future career path.I think she was counting on the majority of the voters being in one of those categories as well.