eastender said:A number of the original Star Trek episodes had a common link. A few of the lead characters and a "yeoman" would beam down to a planet where there would be a confrontation. The "yeoman" would be killed - never stunned, but killed. Hence my previous comment.
That's true, and the "yeoman" who was killed was just a guy in a uniform and not a character who was ever developed. The reason for this sacrifice at the beginning of every episode was to develop a sense of the deadly danger threatened against the lead characters who survived the confrontation (invariably Kirk, Spock and McCoy).
We know the cops at HB Park were in danger, but we don't know if it was deadly danger or not. Regardless of whether they were threatened with deadly force, it seems to me that it makes sense to have a weapon which completely incapacitates a victim without killing him.
Eastender, let's assume for the moment that you are able to invent a "phaser" like weapon for police officers which could be used exactly as shown on Star Trek with "stun" and "kill" settings, and shown to be safe and effective. Some questions:
1. How quickly would you become a wealthy man after getting a patent for this invention?
2. If the cops had such weapons and were going to make an arrest at HB Park, would it be necessary for them to have the "phasers" on "kill" setting? Or would "stun" setting be sufficient? Can you think of any reason why this same situation could not be defused with phaser on "stun" with Mr. Villanueva being subdued and then arrested?
Last edited: