Montreal Escorts

The Death Penalty to 40 years old Vince Li !! See him I have the link !!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apr 16, 2005
1,004
1
0
More empty rhetoric 'soft on crime'. Right. We have increasingly weakened the laws have we? I must have missed that news report. Cops are letting people off, because it interferes with their trip to Parasuco for new jeans and red hats?

Well I'll tell you what. Get me the stats for charges laid to compare with conviction rates and show me how both trends are on a decrease. Then we'll talk.
 

eastender

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
1,911
0
0
Statistics

YouVantOption said:
More empty rhetoric 'soft on crime'. Right. We have increasingly weakened the laws have we? I must have missed that news report. Cops are letting people off, because it interferes with their trip to Parasuco for new jeans and red hats?

They've got this new thing called Google, and StatsCAN:

http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/legal02.htm?sdi=crimes

OMG! You are right! Traffic offenses are going up, drastically.

What we do have is news media stoking the hysterical fires of sensationalism, and so each crime that does occur is examined for any manner of titillating, lurid content, and those aspects are played up.

Oh right, add another to the list of murders I know about personally, I just remembered one where this latter is precisely what happened.

A few comments about the statistics posted in the link. Incidents do not reflect criminality since one criminal may commit multiple incidents.

The data has to be balanced against apprehension and conviction rates.
 

YouVantOption

Recreational User
Nov 5, 2006
1,431
1
0
114
In a house, on a street, duh.
tnaflix.com
Regular Guy said:
Well I'll tell you what. Get me the stats for charges laid to compare with conviction rates and show me how both trends are on a decrease. Then we'll talk.

This, Gentlemen and ladies, is the online equivalent of sticking one's fingers in one's ears and going 'La la la la, I can't HEAR you!'

You keep making baseless assertions that crime is going up, and that we are soft on crime. I provided statistical evidence that you are completely wrong. it is now up to you to prove contradictory factual evidence. That's how the game is played son. Failing that, I have won game set and match in this part of the discussion.
 
Apr 16, 2005
1,004
1
0
YouVantOption said:
This, Gentlemen and ladies, is the online equivalent of sticking one's fingers in one's ears and going 'La la la la, I can't HEAR you!'

You keep making baseless assertions that crime is going up, and that we are soft on crime. I provided statistical evidence that you are completely wrong. it is now up to you to prove contradictory factual evidence. That's how the game is played son. Failing that, I have won game set and match in this part of the discussion.
Sorry I took so long to reply. Hard to type with my fingers in my ears. And Eastender, you too. Get your fingers out of your ears! Sorry for my obtuseness but it's getting late and I am off. You win - game set and match!
 

eastender

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
1,911
0
0
Explain???

Regular Guy said:
Well I'll tell you what. Get me the stats for charges laid to compare with conviction rates and show me how both trends are on a decrease. Then we'll talk.

If overall incidents are down you have a decrease in criminal events, since the ideal objective is to get criminal incidents down to zero.

The fluctuations in the apprehension and conviction rates do not necessarily
reflect an increase or a decrease. Apprehending and convicting one criminal for 100 incidents does not have the same effect as apprehending and convicting 10 criminals for one incident or 100 criminals for 100 incidents.
 
D

Daringly

Doc Holliday said:
The problem with the death penalty, as told by judicial experts on Larry King several months ago, is that it costs a fortune to prosecute them. The trials are also very time-consuming & there's no proof that the accused will be given the death penalty even if he or she is found guilty. That's why many states that still have the death penalty are not pursuing it 95% of the time & are heading towards abolishing it.

The cost to prosecute them does not make one bit of difference to me. All it means is we have a broken system that needs to be fixed. I am interested in justice and prevention. You take a life then you have given up your right to life. If you are put to death you will not murder again.
 

Techman

The Grim Reaper
Dec 23, 2004
4,195
0
0
You want examples of our fine justice system at work? How about this very recent example:

First degree murder charge in death of missing Montreal girl

Thu, 2008-07-31 17:01.
Shuyee Lee
A 44-year-old Yamaska man has been arraigned in court in connection with the violent death of his son's 17-year-old girlfriend.

The court appearance in Sorel was a brief one.
"Richard Bérard has been charged with first degree murder and kidnapping."
SQ spokesperson Melanie Paul says the 44-year-old man may face more charges when he returns to court in September. The defence has asked for special protection for his client while he's detained.
Bérard is accused of murdering 17-year-old Melissa Beaudin, the girlfriend of his son. Her body was found after an almost day-long search in the small farming community of Yamaska.
"It was a violent death. Firearms and sharp weapons were not used."
Bérard has a long criminal history dating back over 20 years, from drug and mischief charges to a two year prison sentence for sexual assault, uttering threats and armed assault.

And that's just one example. I'm certain that if I took the time to look up others on the net I could find many others. The sentences handed out to sex offenders here is laughable. Not to mention those handed out to so called juvenile offenders whose name and photo cannot even be published.

Remember the Toope murders? Well those kids are out on the street as we speak. Maybe living next door to any one of us.

http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=M1ARTM0010551

And more evidence on how effective rehabilitation is:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2000/02/09/toope000209.html

And because of their previous conviction they can never be identified no matter what they do. Wonderful isn't it?

Techman
 

korbel

Name Retired.
Aug 16, 2003
2,409
2
0
Her Hot Dreams
Hello all,

Well, aren't we all having a ball with this thread. Nearly 200 posts in a few days. This is quite a show.

Ugh,

Korbel
 

eastender

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
1,911
0
0
No Guaratees

Techman said:
You want examples of our fine justice system at work? How about this very recent example:



And that's just one example. I'm certain that if I took the time to look up others on the net I could find many others. The sentences handed out to sex offenders here is laughable. Not to mention those handed out to so called juvenile offenders whose name and photo cannot even be published.

Remember the Toope murders? Well those kids are out on the street as we speak. Maybe living next door to any one of us.

http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=M1ARTM0010551

And more evidence on how effective rehabilitation is:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2000/02/09/toope000209.html

And because of their previous conviction they can never be identified no matter what they do. Wonderful isn't it?

Techman

And a well known hitman from the 1970's and early 1980's has been out of prison for over ten years without any problems.

Yet the alleged killer in the seminal incident to this thread led a normal perhaps boring life.

The Toope tragedy had the same net result as other instances where an adult child - having led an exemplary life, kills their elderly parents.

Life offers not guarantees.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
20,368
3,267
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
thebitchelor said:
hello darling;)im agree with you..this is why i stopped post here...this kind of conversation could keep on years aftrer years cuz its only abotu personnal opnion and it not often people change their opinion..(or at least.because of somebody else)...so everybody want to show that they are right..

Bitchelor,

I agree with you that this thread is pointless because you just have the same opinions being regurgitated over and over, which gets boring after a while. I never posted my opinion in this thread, only facts on what jurisdictions in the USA are doing legally in terms of capital punishment. The only interesting point raised in this thread was JustBob's point that the trend in the last 100 years is the nations and states around the world are doing away with capital punishment. That is FACT. Whether that is a good thing or a bad thing can be debated endlessly and pointlessly. I only interjected some facts due to JB's point about the decline of capital punishment in the last 100 years.

By the ways, I did some research on capital punishment in Canada. The last execution in Canada was in Toronto in 1962. It's been de facto abolished since 1964 and de jure abolished since 1976. So the whole thread is irrelevant and pointless. An interesting note though is that Canada had an official hangman prior to 1962 as all executions in Canada were conducted by hanging. There was a legendary hangman by the name of Arthur Ellis (not his real name, as a hangman used handles like we do on this Board). Arthur lost his job in 1935 due to a botched hanging in Montreal resulting in the decapitation of a woman whose weight had been underestimated for the rope used. She was being held at the Montreal women's prison (now D'Emma restaurant) and Arthur accepted a written estimate of her weight, rather than weighing her himself, in order to calculate the length and width of the rope to be used. She was 32 pounds over the weight estimated resulting in her public decapitation. As executions were public at that time it led to extreme controversy in Canada, and historically may be viewed as one of the reasons why the death penalty was ultimately abolished in Canada (from what I have read).

Arthur Ellis died in Montreal in abject poverty in 1938, 3 years after the botched execution. He had been Canada's hangman for 22 years since 1913 and was considered a master craftsman in the hangman trade until at age 71 he botched the execution of Thomasina Sarao.

The Crime Writers of Canada present annual literary awards – the Arthur Ellis Awards – named after this pseudonym.
 
Last edited:

korbel

Name Retired.
Aug 16, 2003
2,409
2
0
Her Hot Dreams
thebitchelor said:
hello darling;)

im agree with you..this is why i stopped post here...this kind of conversation could keep on years aftrer years cuz its only abotu personnal opnion and it not often people change their opinion..(or at least.because of somebody else)...so everybody want to show that they are right..

Hello B,

So, you are up already. I was dreaming of you last night. Ummmm, so nice.

These posts have ranged from thoughtful and informative to phobia-plagued rants. Personally, I just love when a reply injects pet peeves, biases, and/or fears that have nothing to do with what I said onto me. Some members, who have proven many times to be very intelligent writers, have let their emotionalism on this issue get away from them. The issue was on a vicious killer and that ilk, not every weakness of the justice system or a battle over which country is worse. But, this is free speech...I guess. Let the games continue.

Happy posting,

Korbel
 
D

Daringly

eastender said:
And a well known hitman from the 1970's and early 1980's has been out of prison for over ten years without any problems.

Or perhaps we should say no problems that we know of.
 

Techman

The Grim Reaper
Dec 23, 2004
4,195
0
0
YouVantOption said:
Really? Then how do you explain the FACT that crime rates are the lowest they have been in TWENTY FIVE YEARS???

http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/crime/stats.html

By the way, the sheep spoke and made it a minority government upon the the hill. Bah! BAH!

Now, in Quebec, there is no doubt there is a lamb lobby of English people who don't seem to mind our rights and language being trampled and spit upon, but all of this is off-topic to a discussion about the death penalty. Start another thread if you want to debate language rights, or lack thereof.

Where did I, or anyone else bring up language rights??? I mentioned taxes as an example to show that people tend to allow the government to do whatever it wants with little objection as well as an example that the govenment doesn't really give a damn what it's citizens want.

You wanted examples of where our system is soft on crime and I posted a couple for you to check out. And I don't necessarily mean that the laws are not in place, the problem is the application of the law and the sentences given out by the courts once a conviction is obtained. That is where the system is failing...there and in it's misguided view that anyone can be rehabilitated.

Just the fact that we have a 'faint hope clause' is ridiculous. How about a 'no hope clause', as in you commit a brutal murder and you have no hope of ever seeing daylight again?

And I'll leave you with one last example...

Dave Hilton Jr. served 5 years in prison for sexually assaulting his two daughters when they were under the age of 14. Since his release he has been in a revolving door to jail, constantly violating his parole and still keeps getting released. How long before this guy really loses it and seriously hurts or kills someone?

5 YEARS! For sexual assault on his own DAUGHTERS!!! This guy should be rotting in jail until he is too old to pose a threat to anyone.

Now tell me again how our justice system is not soft.:(

Techman
 
D

Daringly

thebitchelor said:
hello darling;)

im agree with you..this is why i stopped post here...this kind of conversation could keep on years aftrer years cuz its only abotu personnal opnion and it not often people change their opinion..(or at least.because of somebody else)...so everybody want to show that they are right..

I do agree with the bitchelor on this one, this is about personal opinion and no one is going to change anyone elses mind. The death penalty is a topic that people on both sides of the fences feel very strongly about. I have never ever even have had a shadow of a doubt that the death penalty is fair and just.

A life long best friend of mine is dead set against the death penalty and him and i are on the opposite side of the fence on politics and many other issues but at the end of the day we still get along and go for a cold one:)
 

eastender

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
1,911
0
0
Poor Example

Techman said:
Dave Hilton Jr. served 5 years in prison for sexually assaulting his two daughters when they were under the age of 14. Since his release he has been in a revolving door to jail, constantly violating his parole and still keeps getting released. How long before this guy really loses it and seriously hurts or kills someone?

5 YEARS! For sexual assault on his own DAUGHTERS!!! This guy should be rotting in jail until he is too old to pose a threat to anyone.

Now tell me again how our justice system is not soft.:(

Techman

Poor example. You have a family where the kids were taught to fight from the time they were toddlers. Their physicality is more or less natural and all they know. All you have illustrated is the power of media attention.

One of the leading boxers in Montreal right now was involved in alot worse in his early days. Likewise a kick-boxing champion from the early 1980's until someone virtually destroyed him.

Conversely there were kids that I coached who were viewed as candidates to kill or get killed before the age of 25 who turned out normal by most standards, living productive lives in their late thirties and forties. Similarly one of the gentlest guys that I played football with committed a double murder.

All of the above received little or no media attention.

Other than 20/20 hindsight there is no predictability.
 
Last edited:

JustBob

New Member
Nov 19, 2004
921
0
0
Speaking of Texas :)

Well the DallasNews did change their stance on the death penalty so some do change their minds. :)

One interesting thing to note here, among others, is that states with the death penalty do not have lower violent crime rates than those without. In fact they are often higher.

The Myth of Deterrence: Death penalty does not reduce homicide rate

DEATH NO MORE


09:26 AM CST on Sunday, December 2, 2007

In theory, the death penalty saves lives by staying the hand of would-be killers. The idea is simple cost-benefit analysis: If a man tempted by homicide knew that he would face death if caught, he would reconsider.

But that's not the real world. The South executes far more convicted murderers than any other region yet has a homicide rate far above the national average. Texas' murder rate is slightly above average, despite the state's peerless deployment of the death penalty. If capital punishment were an effective deterrent to homicide, shouldn't we expect the opposite result? What's going on here?

Human nature, mostly. Murder is often a crime of passion, which by definition excludes the faculties of reason. The jealous husband who walks in on his wife and another man is in no position to deliberate rationally on the consequences of killing his rival. The convenience store robber who chooses in a split-second to shoot the clerk has not pondered the potential outcomes of pulling the trigger.

People overtaken by rage, panic or drunkenness should be brought to justice, of course, but they are hardly paragons of pure reason, and it's unreasonable to assert that they consider the possibility of a death sentence when committing their crimes.

Too distant a threat

Even premeditated killers don't expect to be executed. And for good reason. Statistics show that a homicidal gangster is far more likely to die at the hands of his fellow thugs than the hands of the state. As economist and Freakonomics author Steven Levitt writes, "No rational criminal should be deterred by the death penalty, since the punishment is too distant and too unlikely to merit much attention."

Well, then, just speed up the appeals process, some say. But the appeals process has already been shortened as much as possible without being reckless. This at the same time that a steady stream of DNA exonerations have raised important questions about investigative tactics once thought to be foolproof.

Is it worth the risk of killing innocent people on the unproven theory that it would result in fewer innocents dying via homicide?

This year, this newspaper reversed its longstanding support of the death penalty because the process is deeply flawed and irreversible. Among the moral, legal and practical reasons for our stance is the absence of hard evidence that capital punishment prevents murder.

Some recent studies purport to show that executions actually deter murders. These studies have been analyzed by others and found to be fatally flawed – "fraught with numerous technical and conceptual errors," as Columbia Law professor and statistics expert Jeffrey Fagan testified to Congress. One Pepperdine study touted last month on the Wall Street Journal op-ed pages found that a national decline in the murder rate correlated with executions. But that study links two broad sets of numbers and leaps to a simple conclusion.

Inconclusive at best

The devil really is in the lack of details. The national murder rate has been declining for a decade and a half – in states with and without the death penalty. But the drop has been faster in states that reject capital punishment. At best, evidence for a deterrent effect is inconclusive, and shouldn't officials be able to prove that the taking of one life will undoubtedly save others? They simply have not met that burden of proof, and it's difficult to see how they could.

The only murders the death penalty unarguably deters are those that might have been committed by the executed. But we shouldn't punish inmates for what they might do. Besides, society has an effective and bloodless means of protecting itself from those who have proved themselves willing to murder. It's called life without benefit of parole. In a previous editorial, we called this "death by prison."

Granting the state the power of life and death over its citizens requires something far more solid and certain than mere guesswork.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts