sambuca - That is a remarkably conspiratorial take on the Fed. While I think they should have left the interest rates as is given the <2% inflation and evidence of encroaching weakness, unemployment <4% usually is a sign they will raise rates, plus they have been slowly moving back up for a while since they were trapped at nothing for so long. The announcement that they would only consider raising them twice in 2019 also seems like a signal for "we don't want to be too aggressive here". The whole thing sounds like they kind of reached a wishy-washy compromise, honestly. No need to posit weird urban legends like they don't raise rates in an election year or are planning a recession. Ockham's Razor.
It's not conspiratorial in any way. It's just an observation on natural Fed bias. Common wisdom suggests that while the Fed rates will be active during an election year they will not go up or down as aggressively as they would in another year. The closer we get to election day the more likely they will wait it out until the election is over.
I asked the question about a soft-landing recession in late 2019. Okay, the Fed doesn't actually technically want a recession, but raising rates does slowdown the economy. Soft-landing is perhaps an imperfect but common description of the perfect world the Fed seeks when raising rates.
Occam's razor - Yes, the Fed hawks won this round in a divided committee. Perhaps the talk of raising rates twice next year is just that.......talk.