Threats, insults and intimidation directed at MERB from MERC. How do we stop it?

[Merlot]

Hello Tony,

I was willing to permit you to continue posting in this thread but you broke the one rule I set down for you which was not to post outside of this thread. You broke that rule by posting a 'review', which has been removed, and you are back on the outside. Any new handles will be banned as usual and their posts removed.

M8

What a surprise.

PS. Merlot: You live in a crystal ball, surrounded by birds and trees, isolated from the dog eat dog real world, never had to face serious danger. So, you have absolutely no idea and you'll never experience what it feels like when someone threatens your income. So before you take sides on any issue that involves a bunch of thugs threatening someone's income, put yourself in their shoes and for a moment imagine what would you do?

M8

That just proves you know nothing. I certainly won't whine about such things on a public board, or ever hint about any possible personal information even if I knew nothing about how you used your brand of so-called friendship to betray Sapman and many others I also know about. Hopefully your blueland pals have not trusted you with anything you can use against them. Because by your own "dog eat dog" standards above it's certain that once they are used up one way you will make whatever use you can of them no many how devious or damaging to them.

We all have our share of serious survival issues and choices of whether to become the "dog eat dog" sort. In the end we all have to seize opportunities that will unavoidably squeeze out others, but look what you have become...a liar, a cheat, a back-stabber of associates and friends, a slanderer, a pseudo-wanna be keyboard thug too cowardly to face those he accuses...damaged goods who chases members randomly with bile who have never done anything to you just so you can have a sick laugh for your own entertainment.

Look at your pals: Dissection Tool/Ziggy, allegedly very educated, now reduced to some kind of obsessed state police-like bureaucrat chasing dirt and keeping personal records while randomly slinging filth and branding members like a fascist court judge...Dee acting insensible of right and wrong, just mindlessly passing out slander like he was giving candy to children at laughing at the damage he tries to inflict...Tom with what became of his family and providing the platform for all of the poison. Then there's Roland. He's not a damaged dirt-monger. He isn't your kind. But he comes to Merb to battle here while doing absolutely nothing about the cause of all the enmity pouring out of blueland...in a de facto sense...passively encouraging the fighting and the bile...a cooperation of silence with all blueland ugliness...a witness standing by letting it all happen. Now you want to excuse all of that blatant, sadly indulgent maliciousness because it's a "dog eat dog" world????? How pitiful of you.

There are things each of us must do to survive, but becoming a compassionless schemer, filth slinger, and back-stabber embracing "dog eat dog" like a sickness to the point of attempting to purposely ruin other lives isn't one of them. That's for the damaged and sick. That's for YOU! Definitely not me.

Cheers pal,

Merlot

 

[sapman99]

Various MERC lies, corrected

Not responding to lunacy is one thing. Outright lies that well-meaning people are swallowing hook, line and sinker must not be allowed to stand unchallenged.

Ziggy, in "Stop Rape now"

I caught Ziggy in a contradiction the other day when talking about GFE services and he now tries to say he was misquoted. He was not, and he even sinks his case deeper by using more quotes: I caught him singing the praises of the JDM girls of long ago (in a recent post) with a plethora of GFE acronyms they were offering. I was quoting this precisely because Anna was saying how the mere public mention of said acronyms was putting girls in awkward situations. Not only did Ziggy try to weasel out of his enthusiasm for acronyms, he goes on to quote one of the JDM girls saying her boss used to blackmail her for precisely the level of service he praised as recently as last month . Total hypocrisy.

After destroying Amélie systematically, Ziggy insults her as a troll because she has the courage to have an opinion contrary to his on the matter. Another demonstration of his "pro-girl" stance. Cough cough.

Lily-Rose, you should read both boards more. ZIGGY IS USING YOU! MERC is the board that started dumping all over MERB in the first place. Here are excerpts of Ziggy's "manic manifesto", with corrections:

THE CALL FOR A BOYCOTT TOOK PLACE ON MER-B
THE DUMPING OF MERB STARTED ON MERC IN APRIL
AS SUCH, FRED ZE-D SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED ON ACCOUNT OF THE BOYCOTT
MAYBE IT'S TOM WHO SHOULD BE
WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IS A BOARD OWNER BOYCOTTING A COMPETITOR (HOW CREDIBLE IS THAT?)
WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IS HOSTILE TAKEOVER
WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IS THE MERC OWNER ALLOWING INSULTS, LIES, MISOGYNY, PRIVATE INFO AND BASELESS ACCUSATIONS TO BE PUBLISHED AND ALLOWING A DIRECT ATTACK ON HIS COMPETITOR TO GO ON FOR MONTHS
WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IS CRASS CENSORSHIP
INDEED, ON MERC ANY OPPOSITION IS SILENTLY STIFLED BY BANNING AND POST DELETION
ALL THIS AT THE EXPENSE OF ANNOUNCERS WHO ARE INNOCENT VICTIMS OF A WAR THAT DOESN'T CONCERN THEM
THE MERC ANNOUNCERS SHOULD BE CONCERNED THAT GOOD CLIENTS ARE BEING SULLIED BY LUNATICS, WITHOUT ANY PRETENCE OF NORMAL BOARD MODERATION
DO NOT BUY THEIR EXCUSES
MERC EXCUSES, DAMN RIGHT
DO NOT BUY THEIR DISTORTIONS AND LIES
I BELIEVE I SAID THAT
DO NOT LET THEM TELL YOU HOW YOU SHOULD RUN YOUR BUSINESS
THESE BULLIES HAVE BEEN DOING JUST THAT FOR AGES
DO NOT LET THEM TAKE YOU HOSTAGE
DO NOT LET THEM KILL YOUR BUSINESS
HARDLY SEE HOW THESE LUNATICS ARE GOOD FOR BUSINESS
DEMAND THE BOYCOTT THREAD TO BE DELETED NOW
DEMAND THE 8+ THREADS ATTACKING MERB BE DELETED NOW
DEMAND THAT MOD8 RESIGNS
DEMAND THAT RUMPLES, SAPMAN99, HORNYFOREVER, GUGU, DOC HOLLIDAY AND MERLO-T BE BANNED PERMANENTLY
I HAVE A LIST TOO
NOW!
SAY NO TO THE BOYCOTT!
SEND TOM A MESSAGE TO PUT HIS MAD DOGS DOWN

Tony, on the disseminastion of private info: "feeding lies, via back-channels, to their pals. Now, consider this. If I take the same route, and post the not-distorted facts about your pals here or the green board, I'll probably start WWIII."

Tony has constantly posted lies linked to tidbits of personal information (enough to identify the culprit within the community) for ages on MERC with total impunity. This must stop at once.

Dee

You have made a big show of your MERB banning while MERC members showing the least bit of opposition get banned in secret on MERC (like me). You did nothing here but post verbal acrobatics to dilute the focus of this thread. You were asked specific questions which you would not answer. Your language went from "silly diplomat" to "scornful terrorist" the moment you started posting on MERC again. No one over there talked about the silent bannings and post deletions that keep "your" board so one-sided and "apparently harmonious".

Tom

I did not wish to have to ask ladies and agencies to stop advertising there. I wanted Tom to realize he had a problem, and fix it. A matter of 2 hours of computer work and the hiring of real moderating staff can do it. He will not.

We have tried other methods, and they will not work. MERC is a danger to the community in its current state of lunacy, and must change or go.

Any board that bans reasonable posters, yet allows users such as Ziggy to have "Fuck you Rumples" as a "user description" has gone over the line and is asking for sanctions.

See you again December 1st.
​

 

[HornyForEver]

Didn't Sicky Montana announce his retirement from smurfland? How many hours did his retirement last? A hopelessly addicted dude. Go take care of your family instead dude and slow down on whisky when you post, you are making a big fool of yourself.

Sapman, with all due respect, you are wasting your time quoting these lunatics and treating them as if they were normal people. Look at what tony did with the opportunity that was given to him recently on MERB to "defend" himself. He kept writing the same idiotic conspiracy-flavored cr***p. Sicky and Tony are just two puppets in this show, very boring, predictable and stupid puppets. The main target is Tom and his sites E**Mtl and merc, let's do not forget that.

Be back on December 1st.

 

[rumpleforeskiin]

Didn't Sicky Montana announce his retirement from smurfland?

Many times, emulating his now finally departed alter ego.

 

[Merlot]

Hello all,

rape-style behavior and pressure towards SPs to be GFE

Ziggy, in "Stop Rape now"

I caught Ziggy in a contradiction the other day when talking about GFE services and he now tries to say he was misquoted. He was not, and he even sinks his case deeper by using more quotes: I caught him singing the praises of the JDM girls of long ago (in a recent post) with a plethora of GFE acronyms they were offering. I was quoting this precisely because Anna was saying how the mere public mention of said acronyms was putting girls in awkward situations. Not only did Ziggy try to weasel out of his enthusiasm for acronyms, he goes on to quote one of the JDM girls that their boss used to blackmail them for precisely the level of service he praised as recently as last month . Total hypocrisy.

If you were here for The Great Episode, and knew what I know, Dissection Tool/Ziggys new devotion to an immaculate conception-esque version of sex (orgasm with no touching allowed...lol) you would roll on the floor laughing your buttocks off and then shake you head in disbelief and disgust for the grand hypocrisy of it all.

Most of us remember The Great Episode in which the biggest feud ever started and lasted for well over a year. The spark? The now champion of virginal-like by permisson only sex (Ziggy) was taking on not one, but TWO WOMEN like a rutting wanna be stud and in heat for an over-nighter he didn't have the money to pay for, which instigated an ATM machine beating, and a confrontation with one of the ladies that became the source of a feud between several board members...all because of Ziggys frustration at not being able to continue a lusty sexual romp. So the anti-GFE Ziggy of today has either changed a great deal..or his current pose is just a fraud. I vote FRAUD!!!

As for Tonys "rape-style" slander remarks...Tony, maybe you should check with Ziggy about some of his more exotic, highly physically aggressive role-play escapades...also quite far beyond just GFE. Yes Zigs, I do know. Of course this is just mutually agreed role-play, nothing wrong with that. But it's the hypocrisy of YOUR fantasies versus YOUR mister clean and polite poses and YOUR slanders that is the point.

You know, in my view there is no real need to close blueland, or ban any smurf. All that is necessary is to stop the gross lying slanders of terrorism, rape, pedophilia, personal threats and the attempted gathering of personal information to damage members private lives. IT'S ALL EXACTLY UNDER THE CONTROL OF TOM/THE WICKERMAN. All he has to do is say no more and it's done. You can cry "shill" to your hearts content. But the slanders, threats, and personal invasions must stop. It's just that simple.

Cheers Fellas,

Merlot

 

[rumpleforeskiin]

A peace agreement is possible to be made, but of course, each boards will have to clean their own boards of all traces of it.

An excellent idea, Maria. Unfortunately, that's what we've been trying to do for months. For this to happen, merc will have to go back almost a year, deleting a couple of dozen threads and hundreds of posts. What merb will have to do is delete this thread alone. I'm sure the mods here will be happy to comply as soon as merc has been scrubbed of all the the assaults on merb, me, Sapman, Techman, Merlot, Athana, Amelie, Jasmine, Scarlett and whoever I might have forgotten.

Good luck.

 

[Merlot]

An excellent idea, Maria. Unfortunately, that's what we've been trying to do for months. For this to happen, merc will have to go back almost a year, deleting a couple of dozen threads and hundreds of posts. What merb will have to do is delete this thread alone. I'm sure the mods here will be happy to comply as soon as merc has been scrubbed of all the the assaults on merb, me, Sapman, Techman, Merlot, Athana, Amelie, Jasmine, Scarlett and whoever I might have forgotten.

Good luck.

Hello Maria,

First, my deepest heart-felt congratulations to you on completing your goals and now being able to move on to something much better. It was a great honor and privilege to share time with you and be so close to a wonderful lady of such incredible warmth, kindness, sweetness, thoughtfulness and passion. There has never been anyone quite like you and the memory of your unique spirit will stay with me in my heart. All of my best to you forever.

Regarding your solution:

Hello all,

You know, in my view there is no real need to close blueland, or ban any smurf. All that is necessary is to stop the gross lying slanders of terrorism, rape, pedophilia, personal threats and the attempted gathering of personal information to damage members private lives.

Cheers Fellas,

Merlot

As you can see Maria in my post I made precisely the same suggestion the day before you made yours, so we are of one mind. But what's the point. TOM/The Wickerman could have stopped this years ago simply by following his own rules..."issues dealing with another board will not be posted in blueland"...yet it has gone on for years. I have petitioned TOM dozens of times by PM, email, and publicly for years while a member in blueland to stop all of this, and this thread has done the same. TOM has said he can't do anything when the real situation is HE WON'T.

To end all of this instantly all TOM has to do is stop it and follow his own rules. WHAT IS SO HARD ABOUT THAT.

Cheers,

Merlot

 

[Maria Divina]

Hello Maria,

First, my deepest heart-felt congratulations to you on completing your goals and now being able to move on to something much better. It was a great honor and privilege to share time with you and be so close to a wonderful lady of such incredible warmth, kindness, sweetness, thoughtfulness and passion. There has never been anyone quite like you and the memory of your unique spirit will stay with me in my heart. All of my best to you forever.
*
*
*
*
*
Cheers,

Merlot

Hello Merlot and all of you...

I did try to do something to help you to resolve this problem, but like I said, I don't want to be anymore mixed into your war, and all the other girls too...

I just want to thank you very much for your very kind words about me, Merlot, but, I just want to clarify just a little thing: I will still be active as an escort probably until the end of February at the most, that's my last months in your company, guys.

I am really sad of what is happening with your war, and how you mixed the girls into it. That part is incredible. You are putting things in their right perspectives to your eyes, I guess.

And a question, just a question like this: and if your boycott won't work, what is the next step?

I got all my "regulars friends" for my part. I think all the girls have theirs. Do you have another solution to end this war?

Good luck in your conflict resolution, me, I am out of here...dixit Shania Twain

 

[sapman99]

A board that would be illegal anywhere else

...and how you mixed the girls into it. That part is incredible.

Very simple: if "le Journal de Montréal" said your friends are rapists, engage in unprotected sex acts with strangers, what would you do? Maybe ask the paper for a retraction, and what if it never came? You would stop reading that paper, you would never advertise your business in it, and you would make sure to tell your friends to do the same.

Our situation is the same. The only difference is that the hobbyists only contribute financially to the boards via date donations. Your advertising is the only thing that keeps the content (good and bad) online.

This is a clear case of conscience, not a "war". I am sorry you do not see this. You cannot write what these guys are writing in a newspaper, the editor would get arrested.

Any service provider with any sense of justice cannot advertise on MERC in good conscience, at least not the way it is being run right now.

It is wrong.

 

[Mod 11]

Maria, off-topic put the parallel is the same:

If you follow the actuality, you might know that, for the next winter, Quebec farmers have decided to prohibit snowmobile owners and 4-wheelers to use paths crossing their lands. This decision will actually kill the snowmobile industry in some area because adepts will have no way to go from point A to point B, without crossing some farmers' lands.

The parallel is this: The farmers have nothing whatsoever against the smowmobile adepts. Some farmers actually indirectly make money when there's more visitors to their area. Why have they decided to prohibit snowmobile adepts from their lands? The farmers are at war with the provincial insurance regime that covers the "récoltes" and, this action is all they have left to make the government listen.

This situation will result in thousands of dollar of profits lost for small town business owners; hotels, restaurants, repair shops, gas stations... The people visiting these small places in snowmobile won't be there this year. Some business will likely go bankrupt because of this and guess what? Some of these businesses are owned by farmers and their friends/family!

Why do it anyway? The farmers feels that's all they have left! Well, some snowmobile associations are already pressuring the government to solve the issue. Will it work? The government is already in bad shape so, ignoring these associations would be one more nail in the coffin.
​

MERC isn't in such a good shape either. If advertisers pressure Tom, he will have no choice than react. That's what the boycott request is all about: Tom can easily avoid causing trouble to providers by simply removing mention of MERB and it's members on MERC.

Here on MERB, we have no problem prohibiting comments about MERC and it's members. It's not difficult and simply goes in the routine we have when we check posts made on the board. With more moderators and less posts, I don't know how Tom can even hint at not being able to stop this; he simply don't want to do it. Why? MERC, as it stands, is like The Jerry Springer Show: it's outrageous but some find it entertaining. Tom don't care about decency, he cares about money. If he stops the clowns on MERC, there will be no traffic left! No traffic, no stats to show to advertisers. No stats, no point to advertise there.

You, the advertisers, have the power to call "bogus" on his stats (people don't even keep reading on MERC, they browse and run away when the see the mess!). You, the advertisers, have the power to tell him you want your ads to be seen. Have you asked Tom to provides you with stats about the number of time your ad was clicked per month? A visitor not clicking your ad is a visitor who didn't read your ad and won't become your customer: that's money wasted on that ad for you. You are not paying for people not to read your ads!

Last, when there's a post someone find offensive, Tom telling you anybody can use the "report post" function is simply a way for him to laugh at your face: a huge part of his board would be reported as objectionable if the members from here that were dragged in mud would "report posts", starting by all Mods here! We were all slandered at some point. Can you find a single occasion where a MERC Mod was slandered here? I'll save you the trouble: there are none! Sadly, we can't even register on MERC and "report posts", we'll get banned as soon as we identify ourselves as MERB Mods.

 

[Merlot]

Hello Merlot and all of you...

I just want to thank you very much for your very kind words about me, Merlot, but, I just want to clarify just a little thing: I will still be active as an escort probably until the end of February at the most, that's my last months in your company, guys.

Yes, I understood your retirement would be in February, but your clarification is welcome. Unfortunately, my usual timing for a return is in April.

Hello Merlot and all of you...

I did try to do something to help you to resolve this problem, but like I said, I don't want to be anymore mixed into your war, and all the other girls too...

I am really sad of what is happening with your war, and how you mixed the girls into it. That part is incredible. You are putting things in their right perspectives to your eyes, I guess.

And a question, just a question like this: and if your boycott won't work, what is the next step?

I got all my "regulars friends" for my part. I think all the girls have theirs. Do you have another solution to end this war?

Good luck in your conflict resolution, me, I am out of here...dixit Shania Twain

As for the boycott, my vote is clear. I also wrote a long detailed post doubting the effectiveness of any boycott, and I said the ladies should not be targeted when TOM IS THE WHOLE PROBLEM.

Everyone, the agencies, escorts, board members, moderators, all clients and lurkers who have been around at all know TOM is in full control of blueland. Yet what does he say? He denies it first. Then he tried to weasel out of responsibility saying essentially there are too many posts to clean them all up...when if he had just followed his own rules in the first place THERE WOULD BE NOTHING TO CLEAN UP...AND NO "WAR" AT ALL.

But though for myself I would target TOM ONLY, Sapman is perfectly right. What has been said in blueland is illegal. Technically, advertising there is cooperation with slanders and threats. I understand the ladies view that they should not be put in the position of being boycotted. But it all starts with TOMs failure to stop this vile behavior. The Boycott itself is only the resort due to years of TOMS UTTER FAILURE to keep his board clean of all the slanders andthreats. TOM and his lice would be arrested and sued aggressively if blueland was "le Journal de Montréal" and such malicious illegal slanders and threats were printed.

What would you ladies do if TOM printed slanderous accusations about you or tried to invade your private lives seeking to inflict permanent damage on your real life reputation?????

Cheers,

Merlot

 

[sapman99]

I beg to disagree

Quebec farmers have decided to prohibit snowmobile owners and 4-wheelers to use paths crossing their lands.

The snowmobilers have nothing to do with the farmers not getting enough subsidies, whereas here not only hobbyists (clients of the ladies/agencies advertising) are being slandered, many ladies are as well. Maria herself was hounded by Ziggy over a ridiculous "friendship request" mini-uproar, and today was "used" by Dee who was playing demagogue with a posters contributions here.

The case for MERC advertisers to stop financing the slander is clear: no legally printed media in Canada would be allowed to print what is being said on MERC. Because this is Internet, the subject is prostitution and pseudonyms are being used, the rules are more murky. Pseudonyms or not, a lot of people know exactly who is being discussed. It is a clear case of conscience, and even good business not to advertise in a "cuckoo press" media.

The case of the farmers versus the government denying snowmobilers access is purely financial.

 

[Mod 11]

Sap, I can't disagree with you on this: this isn't exactly the same. The point is to show there are casualties in such dispute, simply because one party feels there are no other ways. The snowmobile adepts are in an even worst situation since they have no direct control and very limited persuasion power.

In this MERB-MERC dispute, providers are more directly involved and can play a more active role than what's happening with the farmers/snowmobile adepts: providers help providing the money that allows MERC to operate.

 

[rumpleforeskiin]

TOM IS THE WHOLE PROBLEM.

Exactly, Merlot. And the only way to act against Tom is to cut off the money. The only way to stop the money is to stop giving money to those who pass it on to Tom. The only subjects of the boycott are those who are giving money to Tom to advertise on merc or ME.

 

[sapman99]

Not-so "Frivolous" Posts on MERC

Scenario:

• A MERB Hobbyist (we will call him "Hobbyist X to protect his privacy) recently reviews a popular girl.
• The said popular girl was reviewed by Tony who said she did things she does not advertise.
• The girl denies this, and subsequently walks out of Tony's hotel room when sent there next.
• Tony starts launching an attack on her, backed by DT (Ziggy) who digs up 2 years-old drug allegations.
• The "mod" over there refuses to clean up the mess, citing his "hate of drugs" (talk about "innocent until proven guilty", AND living in denial).
• Ziggy starts accusing a MERC member who likes her of "liking her because her service is more liberal on drugs" .
• Add to this that Tony already had a hate-on for the girl's thread starter .
• So yesterday after reading the review on MERB, Tony posts this:

message to MERB Hobbyist X (edited for privacy): Go get yourself tested.

The post gets moved to the "Frivolous" thread, but anyone who is attuned to the community can tell who Tony is talking about...

On the Blue board, apparently "nothing" is deleted. I guess some take their word for that, but I can tell you otherwise . In theory, undesirable posts end up in a separate thread, called "Frivolous Posts".

Because December 1st is tomorrow, I went and took a look at that thread, to see how the "cleanup" was coming along . Not very well, I am afraid to report. Totally innocuous posts find their way there, as well as posts which should stay where they are but are subjectively expunged by their "mod". Posts denigrating the ladies, posts revealing information to identify members in real life, unproven BBFS and drug allegations, posts accusing members of being rapists are still proudly in place in their threads of this madhouse.

One day to go.

Damn! I just realized i was included on ol' Ziggy's hate list!

Very simple Doc: you are a household name, to start with. Second, Ziggy is an information hound. Third, Ziggy knows the words, and the names to drop in order to manipulate opinion.

Look, the other day he was taunting Amélie as to who between them was a better "organizer of SP solidarity" . Three conclusions:

1. Ziggy needs a sex change if he wants to go the girls dinners.
2. Oops maybe not, maybe he wants a freebie in exchange of his organizing skills.
3. We can't invite him to boys night out anymore .

I am sorry Mods if I stepped over the line with this one, but that was begging to be ridiculed for good reason: you have to be a master demagogue to convey the impression in any domain that a client is a good candidate to represent providers. I am not trying to say clients and providers are enemies, far from it. To understand one another is one thing, to purport to represent what you are not is another.

In closing, let me paraphrase John Steinbeck on Ziggy:

How Ziggy managed to make this understood without saying it was a triumph of insinuation. No one could call him a liar. And this was mainly because the lie was in his head, and any truth coming from his mouth carried the colour of the lie.

 

[CS Martin]

In a recent e-mail exchange with Tom of MERC, he suggested that I delete a couple of my posts on MERB as objectionable to him. I declined. This will be all that I post on this matter.

 

[Man Spors]

Dear John,

Anyways, please give Lucky a kiss on my behalf. I'll certainly miss her.

This is an example of the posting of private personal information that is permitted on Merc. Posting of this information only serves to hurt people's personal lives.

Should this information be true or not, fact or fiction, it matters not, as it's NO business of anyone's. It is allowed to be left there under none other than the Freedom of Revenge Act, both by the poster and the board owner.

And to the Ziggmeister who felt he had some petty need to comment on this, my guess is that your other half wouldn't like to read about your have sex with prostitutes here on a sex board would she ?

 

[gugu]

If on MERC THEY post personnal information like names and all it is THEIR problem.

Of course, if someone posts your name and adress on a board, adding that you have raped a girl yesterday, it is not a problem for you, it is his problem. So there is no problem with posting any personal information on anybody on Internet according to your point of view?

 

[CS Martin]

Of course, if someone posts your name and adress on a board, adding that you have raped a girl yesterday, it is not a problem for you, it is his problem. So there is no problem with posting any personal information on anybody on Internet according to your point of view?

gugu, you of all people are posting about privacy issues? Now I've had my ROFLOL for today. It's kind of like Tony saying he's a virgin.....

 

[gugu]

"If you or someone else went to a GT and shared personnal information then live with it. We all make mistakes. Move on."

So I see you agree it's OK for any board owner to let members post any personal information on anybody, even if contrary to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act of Canada.

All that I am saying is to stop giving them power just ignore them the problem will go away.

If that was the case, this thread would not exist.