It can be hard being new and not understand the industry. I was lucky to have friends in the industry when I got in but if you dont girls can very easily be taken advantage of. Tools like this is exploitative and destroy the entire purpose of reviewing. If you only review for a fee then clients get gake reviews and girls are taken advantage of. Its a lose lose for everyone but theu guy posting these bribe reviews.
that being said it hasn't ever happend to me so I'd like to think it's very uncommon.
There are some guys who I believe enjoy mistreating others & that treating others like shit somehow inflates their ego. If they try to do this to you, tell them to go fuck themselves. They might write a negative review, but you at least get a chance, or your agency gets a chance, to respond to reviews like this, and then leave it up to Merb members to make up their own minds. For the most part, I think guys here will be smart enough to figure out the truth.
Hello guegeh85
The purpose of it is the influence the lurkers ,the guys who has a handle but is to nervous to post or whatever reasons ,he has not to post .
Cheers
Booker
I'm not sure if I'm understanding you correctly. I don't think that just because someone is a lurker necessarily means that he (or she) doesn't know what's going on. There are probably people who have been lurking on Merb since it was started and who have still never posted. I think lurkers and posters are probably equally adept at figuring out who is full of shit and who isn't. They might influence newbs with negative reviews, but not everyone. I've read negative reviews about woman that I thought were unfair and out of place, and that's for women who I'd never been with. I've gotten to a point where I don't pay much attention to reviews anyway -- I'd rather take my chances. Life is what you make it.
There are some guys who I believe enjoy mistreating others & that treating others like shit somehow inflates their ego.
My thoughts.
First off any member who requests this from a SP should be exposed. Second why let the SP know you are a member? Third, if you have 1000 sq ft of wall to paint from dark to light how many gallons of primer and how many gallons of paint should I buy.
You will get about 400 square feet of coverage/gallon if you buy good paint. One coat of primer and 2 coats of regular paint should do it. You can do the math.
Life is what you make it.
Not true for all !SadlyLife is what you make it.
The process behind marketing strategies is to influence people ,either negatively or positively ,reviews on a forum are part of that process .There are probably people who have been lurking on Merb since it was started and who have still never posted. I think lurkers and posters are probably equally adept at figuring out who is full of shit and who isn't. They might influence newbs with negative reviews, but not everyone.
Continuing to play devil's advocate, is this really such a bad thing? Depending on how you define a 'perk,' one can even argue Zoë herself made such a trade - those who wrote reviews or posted in her review thread when she transitioned to indy were among the first to be contacted, no? Was that a perk? I think so, and a damn good one, too, for which I'm suuuuper grateful! Outside the hobby, normal businesses make these trades all the time. Discounts for loyal customers who refer others and who provide testimonials are commonplace. There was an earlier post that exclaimed incredulity at this practice - seriously, have you done business?? The purpose of a business is to maximize profit. If that means taking a loss in one transaction to increase the overall volume of transactions, so be it!
You make a good point here. I did/still do favor my reviewers quite a bit - not so much with monetary discounts but by giving them preferential treatment when I make my schedule, as a token of my appreciation. So that is technically a perk I give in exchange for a review, and maybe some people would consider it unfair and wrong.
do you need a hug wolfie7?
it's my specialty :smile:
You make a good point here. I did/still do favor my reviewers quite a bit - not so much with monetary discounts but by giving them preferential treatment when I make my schedule, as a token of my appreciation.
To all the guys who see this as black and white - come on, man.
But when someone becomes so closely linked to either a lady or an agency that the relationship becomes one of directly trading off promotions for favors, discounts or whatever that have actually become a kind of payments for reviews then it's become dirty dealing
This is interesting..
Do you have any examples , or is this another conspiracy theory
The implications of this thread, which I already presumed were a reality, are the reason 95%/or more of my future encounters will be with Indy's. Also, the increased probability of coercion on younger women by 'manager', hunger to succeed, lack of exp, etc, is why I generally will steer clear of 18-21.