Also executed with minimal bloodshed. It sends a message to the Iranian leaders that they can be next if they continue their misbehaviors.How U.S Delta Force Raid Captured Maduro:
It's great to see that all that U.S. military hardware actually works and that American forces really know how to execute a complex, dangerous mission.
Or Canadian leaders.Also executed with minimal bloodshed. It sends a message to the Iranian leaders that they can be next if they continue their misbehaviors.
They haven't misbehaved. They may not agree with US Policy, but they haven't misbehaved. The Iranian leadership, on the other hand, has misbehaved both domestically and in their foreign policy and nuclear program. Which is why the U.S. had to go in and disarm them, and may need to do so again. Keep in mind that this is for your protection as well, even though you, unlike US taxpayers, aren't paying for it (a subject for another thread).Or Canadian leaders.
You would make a great add man for the US lol. I am not particularly fond of US flag waivers.They haven't misbehaved. They may not agree with US Policy, but they haven't misbehaved. The Iranian leadership, on the other hand, has misbehaved both domestically and in their foreign policy and nuclear program. Which is why the U.S. had to go in and disarm them, and may need to do so again. Keep in mind that this is for your protection as well, even though you, unlike US taxpayers, aren't paying for it (a subject for another thread).
On that note I see a lot of hypocrisy from certain posters who in other threads have demanded that U.S. act as "world policeman" in other parts of the world, even though said hypocrites are Canadians who don't pay a cent in taxes to support the US military and need to shut their mouths. Now of course the USA, at its own significant expense, has acted as "world policeman" and eliminated a bogeyman (much like the characters in Stranger Things eliminated Vecna), to the applause of much of the world and from many Venezuelans.
It's possibly true that there are legal issues in undertaking this action, but my feeling is that if Congressional approval was sought for this action, it almost certainly would have been obtained (Congressional leadership has been silent and if they are not being critical of the action, nobody else should be). So it may be a no harm, no foul situation, like in hockey when two players collide scrambling for a loose puck. There is no penalty.
Doesn't any country's leadership have a duty to act in the best interests of its citizens? How is this "selfish", if it's a mandate that is perceived by a democratically elected leader and his staff?What you fail to say is that the US does this all for it’s own selfish purposes.
Who's the arbiter of what constitutes "misbehaving"? is it the U.S. state department, with its impeccable track record ?They haven't misbehaved. They may not agree with US Policy, but they haven't misbehaved. The Iranian leadership, on the other hand, has misbehaved both domestically and in their foreign policy and nuclear program. Which is why the U.S. had to go in and disarm them, and may need to do so again. Keep in mind that this is for your protection as well, even though you, unlike US taxpayers, aren't paying for it (a subject for another thread).
On that note I see a lot of hypocrisy from certain posters who in other threads have demanded that U.S. act as "world policeman" in other parts of the world, even though said hypocrites are Canadians who don't pay a cent in taxes to support the US military and need to shut their mouths. Now of course the USA, at its own significant expense, has acted as "world policeman" and eliminated a bogeyman (much like the characters in Stranger Things eliminated Vecna), to the applause of much of the world and from many Venezuelans.
It's possibly true that there are legal issues in undertaking this action, but my feeling is that if Congressional approval was sought for this action, it almost certainly would have been obtained (Congressional leadership has been silent and if they are not being critical of the action, nobody else should be). So it may be a no harm, no foul situation, like in hockey when two players collide scrambling for a loose puck. There is no penalty.
If you think this attack on Venezuela was in the interests of the American people, I have a bridge to sell you. theres a million, common-sense things the US (and canadian) govts could do domestically that would benefit their people far more than thie attack on Venezuela.Doesn't any country's leadership have a duty to act in the best interests of its citizens? How is this "selfish", if it's a mandate that is perceived by a democratically elected leader and his staff?
I expect the leadership of my country to act in the best interests of its citizens. However, when the dual objective of also acting in the best interests of other countries' citizens is also achieved, and they are not paying for it, that's a fairly laudable thing, is it not? It's called a gratuitous military action that is protecting you, for free, since you aren't paying taxes for the protection. I am calling it for what it is- not waving any flags.
This is absurd. There was no war. There was an arrest and a bloodless removal. Of someone whose misbehavior warranted it. I think you are confused about foreign policy.If you think this attack on Venezuela was in the interests of the American people, I have a bridge to sell you. theres a million, common-sense things the US (and canadian) govts could do domestically that would benefit their people far more than thie attack on Venezuela.
Disclaimer: The below quote is from a Vietbamese propaganda account who dislikes America but I have to give them credit - they objectively explained what's going on imo:
"When a country can’t fix its own poverty, homelessness, or collapsing middle class, it redirects that rage outward.
War becomes a pressure valve, a way to manufacture unity through fear and nationalism.
The U.S. doesn’t attack because it’s strong. It attacks because its internal contradictions are too big to solve, and it needs an enemy to stop its own system from imploding.
But exporting anger doesn’t change reality. Only Americans still living under the “kill line” know how little war actually fixes."
In this case, as should be clear from my post, it's me.Who's the arbiter of what constitutes "misbehaving"?
theThis is absurd. There was no war. There was an arrest and a bloodless removal. Of someone whose misbehavior warranted it. I think you are confused about foreign policy.
If it's so terrible to live in the USA how come we literally cannot keep illegal immigrants out? They are coming here to flee their own country and have "poverty and homelessness and a collapsing middle class"? Most illegal immigrants that I know (and I have more than a few as clients) are doing pretty well and have no desire to leave or go back where they came from, including Vietnam. Your post is nonsense from a nonsense source.
He's right. Next up, the Cuban president!
Not true. Read the NY Times article I posted above. Trump offered Maduro a "gilded exile" in Turkey. He refused and mocked Trump- trying to call his bluff. He learned the hard way that he should be kicking it on a beach in Turkey, spending all the bribe money he earned from drug traffickers so they could funnel illegal drugs into the USA and Canada. Now, however, he will have to spend that money on expensive, $1000 an hour NYC criminal defense attorneys.(2) that Maduro willingly gave himself up as a face saving exercise for the US in exchange for leaving certain people from his govt in charge.
Trump needs to send a Delta Force squad for Trudeau.
It is not return of ages old principle: “The might is right”. It has never been abandoned. This is just doing it overtly without any camouflage of a hypocritical cover.Next will be Groenland and after CANADA !
Don't doubt it !
Do you think Trump took out Maduro for the good of Valenzuela people ?
If you think that, you certainly believe in LICORNES !





