I honestly feel like some people who consider themselves "hobbyists" have an opposite way of thinking.
Like they almost seem happy when they have a bad experience cause they GET to write a bad review.
I can't speak for others but in my case i REALLY try to have the best sessions possible (dans mes moyens bien sur) and i am more than happy to make a great review if its deserved. I rather not make negative reviews, ill do only if i need to because thats the purpose of the board.
There is something else too. For you its a hobby and for her its a lively hood.
3) Not a great time. No review because I have no idea if it was my fault, her fault or both our faults....so its safer not to write anything....unless she obviously has a bad attitude and then I`ll write a negative comment but not a full review. I may not have liked her face, or body, or her personality or service....chalk it up to bad chemistry and move on.
Its possible to make an honest review leaning on the negative while still being polite and considering toward the SP. As a client you have to try your best to be "the best you" but at the same time if it does not click, it does not. You can mention it and just precise that it may have been a lack of chemistry. This is what i did in my Nikita review and i didn't felt like i was "bad" to her in any way. I said things as they are. I am aware that i am an overweight starting to go bald metalhead who loves video games ... I know not every escortrs will click with me for various reasons. But her job as an SP is to ACT, make me feel like i am special, like i am "the king" for that specific hour. By that obviously i don't mean worshiping lol, im sure you get the point. Some are better actresses than others, some may not be conversation prone but make up for it with a great sexual drive. Either way im cool with it. I mean if we talk for 2-3 mins and its obvious we have nothing in common and she couldn't care less if i talk to her about what i like, then just jump on me and shut my mouth with your lips
That will be cool for me.
As for look its a bit more touchy, i don't like rating "a body" because its very subjective and im not in the best shoes to be judgy of a look lol, but again its possible to say it diplomately.
This issue touches a nerve for me, because it wasn't long ago I wrote a rather lengthy review describing my disappointment with my very first rendezvous.If a reviewer tends to write reviews that focus primarily on whether or not an SP allows their favorite acronyms, I probably won't put a lot of stock in what they say about an SP's personality.
Your review was overall fine. Maybe the "sex doll" part was leaning a bit on the "harsh" but beside that you called it as you saw it. You even mentioned it was your first meeting so peoples can take that factor too. And for having seen that provider, i had a very similar meeting so i know your review was totally possible. Now when it comes to "first rdv" there is different kind of them, my first rdv was my first time having sex period, so i wasn't too demanding lol. Other guys may had sex with pretty girls and just never tried an escort.
But i can tell you that back then i had some VERY AWESOME first meetings. If i put aside my 2 terrible experiences in Sherbrooke that happened 2 years before, my very first one was just a BJ (took me some time to get to business and was enjoying my very first BBBJ) but it ended in a COF and the girl was very pretty with a killer body (natural Ds) , this was a Montreal lady touring, then i came to Montreal and had my first FS/First CIMSW (x2) lol. The girl in question was soooo hot, like unbelievably hot. At that time i didn't expect to book anybody else afterward, all i was thinking was to come back and seeing her again, but 3 weeks later she left the business for good (or at least merb agencies). I heard some peoples say she got into the massage parlor business but i was too green to even think about trying that and i wasn't sure. Anyway...
Then i saw my third MTL SP wich was "good" but far from the first 2. My fourth one was the famous Chloe Milan so again one hell of a great time. After that this is where it got more on the "montage russe" between "good and average" so because i had such great times with 3 out of my first 4 bookings, i was maybe a bit too much comparing to those and at that time the agencies where a bit more "rocky" than today. My point in saying all of this is maybe if i had started with "average to good but not great" bookings, who knows how things would had turned. Maybe i would had enjoyed them more because i wouldn't had compare them to the awesome ones, maybe i wouldn't had get hooked by Montreal and not sink thousands of $ in the hobby... LOL
There is some times i remember around 2011 or so that i really tough about stoping this entirely, one pretty bad booking in particular that i remember, but then when i came back afterward i had a tremendous time and it gave me the joy in the hobby back.
Basically everything is subjective and depends on the clients point of view, and you can always mention such factors but also you are free to review accordingly WITH those factors.
EDIT : I forgot to add about the last part. Acronymes are important for me and i love when reviews have them. Even tough YMMV can be a thing, if i see the same acronymes repeat with many clients i know my chances are good to get them. Now this does not mean i don't give importance to the personality, look or chemistry. Even if the girl allow all the acronymes i like, if the chemistry is not there, it will be very "meh". Maybe im demanding but i like to get the whole package. I may state if she does not allow cim or cof or whatever, but i don't consider it as a "negative against her". Sometimes i try my luck and i loose... Other times i prefer to wait for more reviews and be more likely to get them. Also with some bookers i know i can ask more freely but some others may not like to discuss this on phone. Its a case by case...
