cloudsurf;1149365 1) said:
What`s the big deal. Most guys in their twenties can do it 5 times in an hour. 2) Now tell me that a guy in his late 60`s can do it 5 times in an hour and that is a big deal. 3) BTW do you know what`s better than cumming in 3 to 5 minutes and then going for another 30 minutes? Not cumming in 3 minutes and going for 30 minutes till the girl cums at least once.
1- I tested it once when I was 16-18, and I achieved 5 in a row, but not sure it was within 1 hour
2- I agree, I'm mid 60 and with Cialis I can do it twice in an hour, but without Cialis, 1 SOG and it's OK. By the way, I don't need Cialis on a regular basis and use it only when I expect having sex dayly, or twice a day for a few days. This pill works great for me. They claim 36 hours effect but on me it's 3-4 days. So at the end, quite cheap.
3- I also agree. One advantage of aging is that it is easier to old on after 40 years old. When I was young, 5 to 10 minutes (sometimes, less...) and it was it. Not so great for girlfriends at this point for the penetration part... Hopefully I was invested in pleasing them anyways they liked and take my time so we can both be more than satisfied sexually. Never got any complains on this subject. Of course, with an SP, it's completely different. Their game is to make us feel good and if they feel for it they will cum. Anyway women are all different and some espress themselves vocally and others prefer to stay silent with a big smile. We should just remain attentive to their reactions. Note that my experience with SPs is not so big as I had stable relationships most of my life and never cheated or hobbied when in couple, believe it or not.
:tea: