eastender said:Saw the other thread and the only viable contribution was by the poster who questionned if prostitutes were going to assume certain responsibilities that are part of any profession. Seems that this is not going to happen so everything moves back to square one. Benefits without responsibilities does not get much support from other people and until this changes the charter will not be taken very seriously even though it is noble in intent.
As for changes. The internet has changed prostitution immensely. Evidenced by this board. The internet also raises other issues that are of concern to prostitutes - privacy issues and copyright issues. Both touch on the diffusion of personal images and information which is not directly raised in the charter.
Finally you still have the unresolved issue of whether prostitutes are workers who unionize or professionals who form associations that in effect police themselves by accepting responsibilities and setting standards, something which unionized workers do not.
I think you are taking this way beyond what was intended with talk of standards, unions and associations. What you call benefits in this charter is just decriminalizing and normalizing the activity of prostitution. I didn't see anything in there significantly beyond asking for the rights already afforded anyone engaged in a western civilization in any legal pusuit to earn a living.
While unions and associations may eventually be a natural evolution, discussing would seem entirely premature until such time as the activity is decriminalized. Aside from the specific advocay demands, which can be ignored I think, most of the rest is covered by existing Employment Standards acts in most western countries
Last edited: