Would You Book a Service Provider if You Knew She Was Being Pimped?
- Thread starter Obvio-0bvio
- Start date
I have always said it that Agencies are the real pimps of this business. I have used agencies in the past, very seldom. yeah, you don't see him like we see in the movies or like then old days in then red Light district in Mtl. I went Indy and have never regrated it, obviously my Indy's are from reputable sites, MERB, IC and Tryst.
The Ann123 & LL are the places where most are scams because of the pimps. As for me and for most guys here have all had a run in with these pimp scumbags. I am 100% Indy and will never use an agency.
Now, what do we say about MP's? or is that another thread that should be started?
The Ann123 & LL are the places where most are scams because of the pimps. As for me and for most guys here have all had a run in with these pimp scumbags. I am 100% Indy and will never use an agency.
Now, what do we say about MP's? or is that another thread that should be started?
Do those sites have a process to guarantee that the Indy girls who advertise on them are “pimp free.”
i don’t think so.
According to popular belief, anyone who assists a service provider could be labeled as a pimp. Bottom line , if a service provider is driven to her client by an Uber driver, the driver is a pimp.Do those sites have a process to guarantee that the Indy girls who advertise on them are “pimp free.”
i don’t think so.
Similarly, if the client contacts her using a phone number from Rogers, that provider could also be viewed as a pimp.
Furthermore, if the client communicates with the service provider via email using a Hotmail account, Hotmail may also be classified as a pimp.
In summary, anyone associated with a service provider is potentially seen as a pimp. Today, I gained a new insight from the discussions on this forum.
Very good point, words have meaning and are meant to convey a message.
The example of "pimp" and "boss" are a prime example. They are miles apart in their meanings. "Pimp" has a specific meaning, whereas "boss" is more generic.
Your example of "ho, hooker, etc." and "escort" are similar. The first two examples are derogatory and the second "escort" is much more palatable and acceptable.
That's a excellent point, I hope this settles the discussion on comparing real pimps to agency owners.
If they got caught they'd get arrested. It's happened before. There are agencies that disappeared for "legal reasons" lol... Please show me the law that makes an exception for agency owners I'm curious
Tony, did get taken away.If they got caught they'd get arrested. It's happened before. There are agencies that disappeared for "legal reasons" lol... Please show me the law that makes an exception for agency owners I'm curious
Personally I always considered agencies as pimps, perhaps not violent pimps but nevertheless profiting off the work of the girls.
This is the reason I have never booked a provider through an agency ever.
i struggled for a long time in even hiring an indépendant as I did not want to be someone who is abusing a woman simply because I can afford the price.
I realized that not seeing an escort will not change their life or stop them from being an escort and at least when they are with me they will be treated with kindness and respect and they will never have to worry about not being payed their asking price.
I am lucky that I see a lady who I have become friends with who I absolutely love being with and look forward to it always, and hopefully she will always consider me not just a client but a friend also.
This is the reason I have never booked a provider through an agency ever.
i struggled for a long time in even hiring an indépendant as I did not want to be someone who is abusing a woman simply because I can afford the price.
I realized that not seeing an escort will not change their life or stop them from being an escort and at least when they are with me they will be treated with kindness and respect and they will never have to worry about not being payed their asking price.
I am lucky that I see a lady who I have become friends with who I absolutely love being with and look forward to it always, and hopefully she will always consider me not just a client but a friend also.
I think any person that stands to profit who's in a position to persuade a SP to do sexwork through any type of coercion (verbal or physical) should be considered the same as a pimp.
That can be an agency owner, booker, driver or even a boyfriend. Unless really obvious, pretty sure most of us are unaware just how many girls are actually "pimped" out.
That can be an agency owner, booker, driver or even a boyfriend. Unless really obvious, pretty sure most of us are unaware just how many girls are actually "pimped" out.
Et bien l'agence ,le booker,le pimp,le driver,le client sont tous contre la loi en sollicitant des escortes pour de l'argent.
On devrait tous arrêter de participer dans cette activité parce que nous sommes dans l'illégalité selon la loi même si moi comme client je suis bien gentil.
On devrait tous arrêter de participer dans cette activité parce que nous sommes dans l'illégalité selon la loi même si moi comme client je suis bien gentil.
J'irais pas jusqu'a là. Mais en théorie t'as pas tout à fait tord. We aren't saints that's for sure no matter how nice we think we are. Our money encourages this... let's not lie to ourselves.
I much prefer to know a girl isn't pimped, is 100% consenting and choosing to do this.... but I know I've seen a few which were at least questionnable. I remember an active girl in one of the advertiser agencies openly told me she had a boyfriend that encouraged her to work even on nights she didn't feel like it... and ya, I did think about it... but I also completed so ya... it is what it is.
All I'm saying, is there are some that have this image that what we do here is ok, as if searching for some reason to justify something. We are Johns, we pay for sex. Without paying, these girls would not be having sex with us period. You can't normalize this and compare it to just a commercial transaction. You might not be holding a gun to the girls head... but your money might very well be reaching the hand holding it.
@neverbored
Yup! That’s the reality! We all participate, one way or another. But some folks here want to believe that some angels are running their favorite agencies, well it might be the case but maybe not the ones they think of,
Yup! That’s the reality! We all participate, one way or another. But some folks here want to believe that some angels are running their favorite agencies, well it might be the case but maybe not the ones they think of,
Dunno why you mention exception for agency owners. Tho thread s topic is about pimps.If they got caught they'd get arrested. It's happened before. There are agencies that disappeared for "legal reasons" lol... Please show me the law that makes an exception for agency owners I'm curious
Pimps go to jail = bad.
Period.
You're the one who pretended like agency owners are immune to the law, I asked you to show me the exception. There are a few who did get arrested so your point was moot is all I'm saying
I believe the bullies would be the bookers. It's maybe an exceptional circumstance that the bullying is overt, like yelling or something. What's more common is probably them not booking clients who ask to see an escort (saying they’re fully booked) because somehow the lady pissed them off. And yet, I imagine such booker tactics must be inspired by the owners desire for profit in some way, since in the end it’s about profits…
Can one this call the booker a pimp? Perhaps. Though it doesn’t bring to mind the same connotation the word is meant to have that is internalized in the here and now for many. The key difference, if we take the terms literal meaning, is that the booker isn’t so much in control of the female agency in our 1st world. And that’s because she has choices to leave and still gain income at a different agency, or via indy, I think. This is also why onlyfans has been a very good thing for sexwork overall. That being said, if I had more insight into the going ons behind the scene, I might indeed think of a booker simply as a pimp. If we begin to deviate from “merb advertisers” ask yourself: if some dude is texting replies from the escorts phone you’re planning to see…is he her pimp? How much control does he have over her life? How much of her earnings is he allowed to claim to not be considered overstepping from booker to pimp??
Can one this call the booker a pimp? Perhaps. Though it doesn’t bring to mind the same connotation the word is meant to have that is internalized in the here and now for many. The key difference, if we take the terms literal meaning, is that the booker isn’t so much in control of the female agency in our 1st world. And that’s because she has choices to leave and still gain income at a different agency, or via indy, I think. This is also why onlyfans has been a very good thing for sexwork overall. That being said, if I had more insight into the going ons behind the scene, I might indeed think of a booker simply as a pimp. If we begin to deviate from “merb advertisers” ask yourself: if some dude is texting replies from the escorts phone you’re planning to see…is he her pimp? How much control does he have over her life? How much of her earnings is he allowed to claim to not be considered overstepping from booker to pimp??
Last edited:
Similar threads
