Helirage, from the Justice Canada website:
So yes, if you gave the flowers, or a drink for that matter, as part of an agreement that she gives you a sexual service in return, that would be "sexual service for consideration"..... crazy world we live in!
What beats me though is that principle that women can NOT consent to being a sex worker. Shame on traffickers and abusive pimps, for sure. However when a woman decides for herself that's what she wants to do, that's her business. I like the way Chester Brown puts it in "paying for it": when it comes to abortion, feminists claim women are the owner of their own bodies and can decide for themselves what is good for them. However when it comes to prostitution, they claim women are being abused as it is impossible for a woman to agree to "sell her body". But anyhow, there is a C36 thread elsewhere in here....
Obtaining a sexual service for consideration” involves an agreement for a specific sexual service in return for payment or another kind of consideration, including drugs or alcohol. It doesn’t matter whether payment is made by the person who receives the sexual service or by another person.
So yes, if you gave the flowers, or a drink for that matter, as part of an agreement that she gives you a sexual service in return, that would be "sexual service for consideration"..... crazy world we live in!
What beats me though is that principle that women can NOT consent to being a sex worker. Shame on traffickers and abusive pimps, for sure. However when a woman decides for herself that's what she wants to do, that's her business. I like the way Chester Brown puts it in "paying for it": when it comes to abortion, feminists claim women are the owner of their own bodies and can decide for themselves what is good for them. However when it comes to prostitution, they claim women are being abused as it is impossible for a woman to agree to "sell her body". But anyhow, there is a C36 thread elsewhere in here....