Nevermind. I thought this was an actual discussion.woke crowd
Nevermind. I thought this was an actual discussion.woke crowd
Although I did not state it clearly, it was indeed my hypothesis (not my theory). You convinced me that among clients at large, there is probably no difference in average attractiveness vs the whole population. This led me to refine my hypothesis that, with respect to regular clients, they must different significantly both physically and psychologically from the general population. I will try to see this weekend if I can find some studies that support (or not) this hypothesis.
Did you read the words that surround the words "woke crowd" in my sentence? Because if there are dogmatic and anti-scientific people in universities, it is definitely the woke crowd. They have proven it over and over again in the past 12 years, and their time in the spotlight is over. I have shown the opposite mindset in my brief interactions here this evening, as my posts can attest.Nevermind. I thought this was an actual discussion.
I read your origional question, and thought it so insulting to clients it didn't warrant an answer, but as I kept reading, you showed just how distasteful your origional question was ment to be.I am sorry that you are offended. I came in with a provocative question, but Luna offered interesting personal insights than led me to refine my thoughts and to integrate psychological aspects as well. Contrary to the woke crowd that dominate universities in social science and pseudo-science, I am open to changing my mind based on information or opinions that are presented to me.
Originally yes, but it has come to define something larger, which is a belief that all differences in outcomes between identifiable groups (based on race, gender, sexual orientation or ability) and the general population must be due to racism, sexism or ableism. Decades of psychological research has proven that this is not the case.Hey fun fact, did you guys know that the word ''woke'' originally meant, and still mostly means, ''anti racist'' and pro human rights? It's AAVE and originates from the 1930's, when the United States was heavily segregated. A couple decades after slavery was abolished. Just saying.
Then feel free to ignore my posts.I read your origional question, and thought it so insulting to clients it didn't warrant an answer, but as I kept reading, you showed just how distasteful your origional question was ment to be.
I don't really know what any of this has to do with our answers to your question.. or at least not mine. I agree that a lot of these so called woke people in universities are out of touch with reality and lack nuance, but isn't saying that regular clients of escorts are mostly ugly and have no friends also without nuance? idkOriginally yes, but it has come to define something larger, which is a belief that all differences in outcomes between identifiable groups (based on race, gender, sexual orientation or ability) must be due to racism, sexism or ableism. Decades of psychological research has proven that this is not the case.
If you want anyone that isn't far-right to take you seriously, don't use the term woke. It's original meaning was "aware of the racism and inequality in our society". The far-right has co-opted it for themselves to basically mean "Anything I don't like but can't go into detail about because that would make it apparent that I'm racist/bigoted/a shitty human being".Did you read the words that surround the words "woke crowd" in my sentence? Because if there are dogmatic and anti-scientific people in universities, it is definitely the woke crowd. They have proven it over and over again in the past 12 years, and their time in the spotlight is over. I have shown the opposite mindset in my brief interactions here this evening, as my posts can attest.
See Post # 2,906. The trick with them is that they make everything (on purpose!) hard to define! To find them in universities, look for departments that end in "studies".but I prefer an actual explanation of what you mean.
Cool, so no clarification about what you meant. Still don't know what aspect of this "woke crowd" it is that you consider to be the problem. I guess that's kind of the point though. Like you said...See Post # 2,906. The trick with them is that they make everything (on purpose!) hard to define! To find them in universities, look for departments that end in "studies".
We've strayed far from the original question and of the purpose of this thread, so I'll go read a book. Good night!
I think your hypothesises are based on societal codes and stereotypes which is already orienting the "answers". Fortunately the sex industry is a safer "society" or safe space where your desires, thoughts are less prone to those judgements. And that's maybe why client base comes from a wide variety of walk of life.I am sorry that you are offended. I came in with a provocative question, but Luna offered interesting personal insights than led me to refine my thoughts and to integrate psychological aspects as well. Contrary to the woke crowd that dominate universities in social science and pseudo-science, I am open to changing my mind based on information or opinions that are presented to me.
Cool, so no clarification about what you meant. Still don't know what aspect of this "woke crowd" it is that you consider to be the problem. I guess that's kind of the point though. Like you said...
"The trick with them is that they make everything (on purpose!) hard to define". Why bother going into details and expressing yourself properly when you can just say woke and have the people that already agree with you give the thumbs up.
Some answers from this post to your question: The first part of the body you are looking firstFor the gents,
We are in a field that your attraction to us is important, not ours to you.
What catches your eye first to book? Legs, waist, breast, butt, lingerie... ect.
And do you book primarily on looks? (Like those who see a picture, number, and don't read anything further) Or does the bio/ad play much importance?
I'm glad that Luna and Rebaynia were here to do all of the heavy lifting on this topic (per usual), but if I've learned anything by being an SP, it's that you are your own worst critic as much as I am mine.This will do nothing in answering my original question, but I will make a poll asking merb clients to self-rate their physical attractiveness, once my current poll on friendship ends. Should be interesting.
I see a lot of unappealing looking guys with wives and kids as they probably have moneyExactly. I had a friend that was never single for more than a week at a time in his life. Even he saw a few escorts. Not because he couldn't get laid otherwise but because he chose to. Maybe he had a certain kink, maybe he wanted to experience hiring an SP, maybe because he just didn't want to deal with all the games that are often associated with dating or even just hooking up. Everyone has their own reason for seeing an SP.
where's your friendship poll?This will do nothing in answering my original question, but I will make a poll asking merb clients to self-rate their physical attractiveness, once my current poll on friendship ends. Should be interesting.