Coronavirus
- Thread starter C.B. Brown
- Start date
There are still not enough masks. If your gonna lead with the notion that forcing someone to wear a mask will impinge on their right to be an asshole then at least make some more N-95’s so people who will wear masks can protect themselves.
I agree it was time medical experts around the world agreed that the wearing of masks is beneficial..
Why the fuck all governments everywhere don’t impose mandatory social distancing and the wearing of masks when that can’t be done I don’t get.
This should not be a political agenda it is preserving life.
It is protecting their citizens health, that is what all these morons were elected to do.
Jim Jordan v. Dr. Fauci!!!!!! I think these 2 should go in the Octagon:
www.cnn.com
Jim Jordan and Dr. Fauci get in heated exchange over protests - CNN Video
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) gets in a fiery exchange with Dr. Anthony Fauci over whether protests should be limited in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic.
www.cnn.com
^^^^ I think he was trying to make a point of Fauci recommending to shutdown bars, beauty salons, restaurants and various other places but he will not say to limit protesters.
Seems like a reasonable question to me. I really do wonder why our entire economy shutdown while the big box stores were allowed to stay open, did anyone see mass amounts of their employees dying, did they need to shutdown if someone got sick ( probably a tiny percentage, less than the 0.04% US fatality rate ).
Seems like a reasonable question to me. I really do wonder why our entire economy shutdown while the big box stores were allowed to stay open, did anyone see mass amounts of their employees dying, did they need to shutdown if someone got sick ( probably a tiny percentage, less than the 0.04% US fatality rate ).
How can you limit a protest? Jimmy J was asking about the BLM stuff, but neglected to ask about all the hillbillies running around packin’ heat with confessor flags behind their trucks lol. Anywhoo, he’s used to looking the other way
Jim Jordan was being disrespectful. But he did make a great point by showing that Dr. Fauci makes recommendations all the time on many different topics and he needs to be more mindful of what he says.
Jim Jordan’s pissed that his favorite erotic massage parlor got shut down by coronavirus safe distancing measures.
Angry Jimmy: “Why, Dr Fauci? Why can people be allowed to protest grave injustices but my little weiner can’t get his rub n’ tug? It ain’t hurting nobody. Why??!!”
The Spanish flu pandemic in the early 1900’s had a death rate of 2.5% and an estimate 50 million + people died. It‘s also very difficult to determine this number during a pandemic. If your saying it’s currently over 3% there would be a lot more deaths than we currently have. STN’s .04% is more accurate.
1918 Pandemic (H1N1 virus) | Pandemic Influenza (Flu) | CDC
Everything you need to know about the flu illness, including symptoms, treatment and prevention.
www.cdc.gov
Jimmy J's aggressive cross examination of Dr. Fauci was grandstanding pure and simple. What Fauci should have responded was that protests do not have to happen with crowds. There are many different methods of protesting and some are safe and some are not. For example online posts are a safe method of protest. Crowding elbow to elbow with people who aren't wearing masks is not a safe method of protest.
If anyone is wondering where Jimmy J cultivated his aggression he was NCAA national wrestling champion 1985 and 1986 in the 134 pound class.
If anyone is wondering where Jimmy J cultivated his aggression he was NCAA national wrestling champion 1985 and 1986 in the 134 pound class.
Waloo numbers don`t lie. Take a look at the number of deaths compared to the number of confirmed cases in the US as well as worldwide and then do the division. You will arrive at over 3%. That percent will probably go down over time.
The Spanish flu pandemic in the early 1900’s had a death rate of 2.5% and an estimate 50 million + people died. It‘s also very difficult to determine this number during a pandemic. If your saying it’s currently over 3% there would be a lot more deaths than we currently have. STN’s .04% is more accurate.
1918 Pandemic (H1N1 virus) | Pandemic Influenza (Flu) | CDC
Everything you need to know about the flu illness, including symptoms, treatment and prevention.
154,000 / 4,800,000 = 3.2%
154,000 / 327,000,000 = .04%
It depends on whether we divide the number of deaths by the number of cases, or by the population.
Both are therefore right.
154,000 / 327,000,000 = .04%
It depends on whether we divide the number of deaths by the number of cases, or by the population.
Both are therefore right.
It's one of those rare moments where we agree with each other.
Just a couple of points. The 3.2% is assuming that everyone that has been exposed to Covid-19 has had a test to confirm this as well as confirming that all Covid-19 related deaths are accurately recorded. Since there's no way to really know either of these numbers especially with the lack of testing it's safe to assume its inaccurate. Your math is correct as well as Cloudsurf's calculation. But, the data is not and that's why you would need to do this evaluation at the end of the pandemic and not during. The .04% is the generally accepted number when looking at the pandemic as a whole. That's the same way you get the annual flu numbers. Even this way of calculating is assuming that all Covid-19 related deaths are accurately recorded.
If your trying to figure out the death rate of people that have been exposed to Covid-19 you'll have to wait for it to be over so you can get an accurate measurement. Or at least that's how it was done for the Spanish Flu pandemic. Lastly, during the Spanish Flu epidemic (which Covid-19 isn't even close) the percentage was 2.5% and 50 million + deaths. Which is why the 3.2% number isn't accurate. If it was, you would have deaths in the hundreds of millions.
Sene your percentage numbers are only a snapshot that will change tomorrow. Come back to this post in December when your first line percent will drop from 3.2% to around 2% and the .04% will be over 1% .
In my opinion there will be 400,000 deaths in the US, before a viable and safe vaccine will have started to destroy this virus.....in a best case scenario.
Also the border will remain shut till after New Years.
I wouldn`t shed any tears for Walooo there are so many hot chicks in Manhatten getting tired of isolation and looking to cheat on their magic wands.
In my opinion there will be 400,000 deaths in the US, before a viable and safe vaccine will have started to destroy this virus.....in a best case scenario.
Also the border will remain shut till after New Years.
I wouldn`t shed any tears for Walooo there are so many hot chicks in Manhatten getting tired of isolation and looking to cheat on their magic wands.
If your 1% holds true there will be hundreds of millions of deaths. I don't think we are anywhere near that yet. Yes, plenty of out of work SP's looking to do some banging in NYC.
Similar threads
