Hello all,
OK, you are putting the qualities of a human, who are quantifiable, in the category "sentimentality".
No. I would never put qualities like beauty, presence, charm, allure, grace, style or any such elements in the category of quantifiable. They are all subjective, emotional, sentimental reactions. If they are quantifiable at all it is because we are talking about prices for sexual services and ladies who are stronger in those qualities are more desired, thus they earn more $.
No, it doesn't mean AT ALL, that guys or gentlemen who don't pay more are not ALL as nice as the others who do.
I am sorry you understood that, I recognized easily that could be interpreted like that, but I am confirming you that's not what I meant. Don't make the error to make this conclusion.
Merci/Gracias. This clarification will make everyone feel a bit better about the original statement. I think we did understand what you meant to say, but an explanation clears up any mistaken offenses.
The worst encounters I add in my life of escort, were the time I was in an agency, long time ago, because I was much more easy to meet: by the way of booking AND the level of donation, I can state that, because when I began as an Indy, the level of donation was identical, and I then too, had people who want to exagerate on me.
I don't know how it works, but that's a fact that people who are paying more (and just a bit more, not a 700$/2hours: I can just talk for my own experience) are a different group of people, except few exceptions.
Yes, raising the level of donation will help discourage the more unseemly clients. But, though dealing only with clients who can afford more only helps. Having more money may indicate success and imply more maturity, but I doubt that people with more money have much less of the psychological quirks/issues against the opposite sex. These issues don't seem to be widely different among earning levels...though obviously poverty creates more general anxiety.
Merlot, First, please stop to talk about "life matching" : that's not what we are doing all together here, and that's not what I was talking about at all.
When you keep referring to so many subjective qualities that create emotional/arousal reactions in men, it seems like you are attempting to use the qualities of real girlfriend-boyfriend attractions beyond the real business relationship to justify these extra costs. It looks like you are blending real match relationships with business. If you were simply saying that an escort who provides better services, and is also beautiful, charming, intelligent, etc, and so she deserves more you wouldn't give this impression of confusing business with a relationship that doesn't require direct payment for services...ie...a real attraction match. In this thread you keep talking about the subjective qualities, and so little about quantifiable services. That's where the impression comes from.
I understand perfectly that you are living negative emotions as hobbiest about the rising of the rates, like others do. I was just asking to understand your points of view, plus I stated some comments about my side of my experience, that's it.
And I repeat, this is all legitimate your questions, I don't deny your rights to do it.
I understand totally your point of view of shoppers, to have "the best for the less", I am like that too, when I am buying shoes or something else, I am trying to have it on sales, and I am happy to succeed to this, of course.
No, rejection of a price is not about emotions, it's about rejecting the higher rate for services and the relative cost-value.
You are a very sensitive and feeling person with a lot of great qualities. I don't even like talking about price in relation to meeting you or the other escorts, because doing so cheapens the human experience. But this hobby is about business, the only avenue most of us would ever get to meet beautiful women so much, so we must keep it about business to avoid emotional complications that could lead either side to confuse the purpose or exploit the other party.
Most of this thread is a tempest in a tea-pot.
Eleganza raising the rate on their 2 most popular girls has had , if anything, a positve effect on the market.
Eleganza has gotten more print, but it's not about them specifically, it's about a trend including Asservissante, Angels, Nadyas and more, whatever their rationale for having higher rates may be.
...the mere fact that one agency operator has openly stated that he wants to put Montreal and Toronto on a level playing field is troubling at best.
That's why John of Eleganza deserves more notice than the rest. When he made a point of promoting his agency that way he put the target on his own back, even if we know others also would love to raise prices to Toronto rates. John put it in the faces of hobbyists so he earned direct response.
Separately, I don't agree with the premise that GNDs cannot be stars. I wouldn't say Elena or Jasmine are absolutely stunning model-esque women. I consider Elena an example of a very lovely and incredibly charming GND, and she is DEFINITELY a STAR of the first order...just for one example. Who can deny the powerful allure of Jasmine's looks and attitude.
When it comes to looks, I've met some fabulously beautiful women in this hobby, but the one who absolutely floored me with her looks wasn't that type. She was the most adorable super cutie GND I've ever been with and in our meeting she showed all the qualities of a "Star", in my view right up there with anyone. Don't ask...she doesn't work any more.
Cheers,
Merlot
