When you speak of "how hot, personality, attitude, presence, "the cochonceté" a woman and even her beauty" you are speaking of qualities that create emotional reactions. They are very important and we clients value them highly, but they are subjective, generating responses of attraction and attachment. One word that generalizes this kind of priority is "sentimental". It's not a perfect term for these things, but it's fair enough. In my view, when you question why these qualities are worthwhile at one price and not at a higher price you are saying that sentimental elements should have priority regardless of price.
I think we clients agree with that, but you escorts don't have to pay for it. We clients pay, and we are saying there's a point at which we have to give more consideration to the cost over sentimentality.
OK, you are putting the qualities of a human, who are quantifiable, in the category "sentimentality". That's ok, I understand your point.
In my point of view, you are X quality, a lot, medium, low, or not at all. I learn on boards this, guys are event putting qualities on /10. So, this is quantifiable.
In any case, if any client thinks the price is too high there's nothing wrong with moving on, and no escort should be offended, especially if she thinks the ones left are "the sweetest people with the best disposition towards the ladies. They don't have even an once of mysoginous attitude at all." I know you are a good person, but I am a little offended by this quote. In case you didn't understand, it seems to mean clients who don't pay more are not as nice and sometimes even have a bad attitude to women. Maybe you didn't mean this, but it can be taken that way. So being willing to pay more makes a client a better person...NOT!!! Many of the worst jackasses have a lot of money.
No, it doesn't mean AT ALL, that guys or gentlemen who don't pay more are not ALL as nice as the others who do.
I am sorry you understood that, I recognized easily that could be interpreted like that, but I am confirming you that's not what I meant. Don't make the error to make this conclusion.
The worst encounters I add in my life of escort, were the time I was in an agency, long time ago, because I was much more easy to meet: by the way of booking AND the level of donation, I can state that, because when I began as an Indy, the level of donation was identical, and I then too, had people who want to exagerate on me.
I don't know how it works, but that's a fact that people who are paying more (and just a bit more, not a 700$/2hours: I can just talk for my own experience) are a different group of people, except few exceptions. This group is more homogeneous for the quality of the men who composed it. That's it. That's doesn't mean there is no bad person at all too, but there is much more less.
The group of men who are dealing with agencies, are very but very less homogeneous: there is gentlemen, yes of course, but there is some really questionable people, who are the people that girls/ladies are really less happy to meet, because of their attitude, and the way they present themselves and using (and this is the right word) using the escort they have in their dispositon. That's not the majority of this group, but there are more in this group than in the group who pay more.
I don't know why it is like that, but it is like that.
You have to stop to take it personally, you are not concerned. I can certified, if you did not changed, you are a sweatheart to meet.
I hope I won't have to certify each one of you I had meet in this thread
No, these are all the more valuable qualities. But this hobby is a business for service, not about making life matches. Frankly, none of this talk about "attitude, skills, education and all the rest" changes the fact that rates are rising and we question why we should pay it.
After 10 years I've learned that rates, especially higher rates, frequently have little to do with the quality of service. There's always plenty of quality at lower rates, and often better.
Cheers,
Merlot
Merlot,
First, please stop to talk about "life matching" : that's not what we are doing all together here, and that's not what I was talking about at all.
I understand perfectly that you are living negative emotions as hobbiest about the rising of the rates, like others do. I was just asking to understand your points of view, plus I stated some comments about my side of my experience, that's it.
And I repeat, this is all legitimate your questions, I don't deny your rights to do it.
I understand totally your point of view of shoppers, to have "the best for the less", I am like that too, when I am buying shoes or something else, I am trying to have it on sales, and I am happy to succeed to this, of course.
But, my shoes will always remain to have the same qualities who made me like them, at first. And my problem, as a shopper, is if I am always waiting that the shoes I would like to have to be "on a special rate" to have it, I have some chances I won't get those at all, it won't be left any. So, from time to time, when I really want something, I am paying the big price to spoil myself and to be sure to have it. That's a matter of personal choice, and budget. If I don't have the budget for something, I won't buy it too, even if I like it so much to have it... but if by chance, I got some more money, maybe I will spoil myself then, and go reach those shoes so nice....
******
I imagine then, if a girl/lady is a really sure person to meet, a sure bet that you will have a great time in her company, that maybe exist some people who don't like to play and take chances, and they will go see those girls/ladies. I don't know this market.
I don't know if in an agency, like Rollinstone said, someone will pay an Indy rate to meet an agency girl, without all the benefice of the Indy. Maybe there is a market for that, who knows? If they have success, we have to believe there had reach a "niche" then.