Hmmm,
WOW!!! Nice to see you were able to leave out all the ugly personal attack labeling...unlike the rest of us mortals. So these are your excuses for doing it anyway.
Actually, you made a good point here. Since he is not denying it's his, the possibility is made credible. If so then why does such a photo exist in the first place? How would anyone else get it to send it? You hit the nail on the head. This guy has made himself look like a lewd idiot, regardless of party affiliation.
It's just to bad you can't get beyond this sad Liberal versus Conservative obsession.
Cheerio,
Merlot
Huh, Merlot? Every chance you and your friends have to bash Sarah Palin and company as far right wingnuts extremists, etc., etc., you take it.
Weiner is obnoxious as they come. He is the Lib poster child. When there are allegations against a Conservative Republican, he is leading the charge.
Now he is in trouble. He got caught (pardon the proverbial pun) WITH HIS PANTS ALL THE WAY DOWN. It is SO HILARIOUS. :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
Merlot, you and your friends (you know who they are) have a Liberal vs. Conservative obsession. You call for Bush and Cheney to be arrested for Lord who knows what. You call them right wingnuts. And when it's one of the liberal nut jobs who are in trouble, you go on like it's no problem. (How about Jonathan Edwards - that sleeze bag indicted for taking campaign to pay for his mistress while his wife is dying of cancer?).
I just know that Socialism, Progressivism, Liberalism whatever you want to call it - does not work. It makes economies not grow. Only 54,000 jobs were created in May, half of them at McDonald's. The liberal savior has been in office for 29 months and the economy is getting weaker, not stronger. My stand on Liberalism vs. Conservatism is Reality. Societies under Conservative monetary policies tend to prosper. Societies under Liberalism/Socialism have less growth depending on the severity of the Socialism.
Hello Daydreamer (Centaurus???),
May I say sir you sound like a very sick person. I agreed with your view while chiding you personally for turning this into the demagoguery and demonization platform YOU, YOU, and only YOU turned this into from your opening diatribe, obviously with full intent. Didn't I say: "This guy has made himself look like a lewd idiot, regardless of party affiliation" and commend you for making a good point. So what is wrong with your brain programming? The episode with Weiner is about one very foolish arrogant idiot. But for you to start a thread intentionally to have a platform to promote your Lib-O-Phobic hatred is both illuminating of your personal issues and disgusting.
Even among Republicans there is a full range of political views, just much less in the Liberal area. And among Conservatives there are more of the rational and judicious sort than the extreme "wingnuts". It just that the extremists are the loudest and most obsessed...and that goes for spectrum of Democrats too. I recently had a very ugly experience with a Democratic Liberal and it was so freaking bloody damn sickening that I left was had been a very enjoyable Memorial Day gathering. I can't stand Democratic Liberal wingnuts any more than the Republican Conservative ilk.
I never called for either Bush or Cheney to be arrested liar. I wanted an investigation. And if you think I am a Liberal then you are definitely as sick and ignorant as your writing indicates. I've really had it with troubled persons who categorize people so narrowly and maliciously.
Cheerio pal,
Merlot
Hmmm,
It did get you to confirm the truth. Case closed.
ish,
Merlot
"I just know that Socialism, Progressivism, Liberalism whatever you want to call it - does not work. It makes economies not grow. Only 54,000 jobs were created in May, half of them at McDonald's. The liberal savior has been in office for 29 months and the economy is getting weaker, not stronger. My stand on Liberalism vs. Conservatism is Reality. Societies under Conservative monetary policies tend to prosper. Societies under Liberalism/Socialism have less growth depending on the severity of the Socialism."
Twenty-Six of the first 36 months that George Bush saw a net loss of jobs. The current problems are the result of 30 years of Reaganomics (increased defense spending, lower tax rates for the wealthiest Americans)--the deficit has come from that. It was about $1 trillion when Reagan took office. "Free trade" has grown the trade deficit and eliminated jobs, something the Tea Party doesn't seem to talk about. Good-paying jobs have been replaced with easier credit. You can't base an economy on the sale of cheap imports and real estate. Republicans gauge prosperity by the number of billionaires, not the size of the middle class.
If neo-con economics really worked, we wouldn't be in a depression to begin with. Of course, Republicans can't accept that because as long as things are good for them (corporate profits reached record levels last year), that's all that matters.