This is exactly what happened to Jeffrey Dahmer, who was savagely beaten to death in prison by vigilante fellow inmates. You may recall that Dahmer was the sadistic serial killer who sexually assaulted and then cannibalized his victims, eating parts of them and storing other body parts in his refridgerator. I believe all of his victims were young boys and minorities.
Karla Homolka in Montreal ??
- Thread starter gohabsgo
- Start date
Honestly I am repulsed by the acts committed by Karla and her husband. The very thought of using young girls to satisfy their sexual fantasies and then disposing of them like worn out rags is disgusting. All that being said, a deal is a deal is a deal. As much as we were all upset by the fact that she only got 12 years I think I like most others was upset because after the deal had been made, it was discovered that if the crown had not been so quick to act they would have had the evidence to convict them both. This isn't her fault and who among us wouldn't have accepted the deal if offered to us. I believe the crown did what it felt it had to given the facts in hand at that time, and because of that I can accept the terms of her sentence as well as the fact that she will be released this summer. I could live next door to her, don't get me wrong, I wouldn't be inviting her to dinner or welcoming her to the neighbourhood. I really think we all need to spend a little more time focusing on the positives in our day to day lives and less time fixating about Karla Homolka and where she might live. 
Karka
I believe, that our Canadian justice, at the time, had already determine, that for this kind of criminal acts plus the support of the offender would represent the 12 years it was given her.
Since then, she tried to get out before, but was never allowed. After spending the full time given to her, she has the rights to step out and try to live another life, if so is possible.
I believe she paid her due to the Canadian justice, it is up to the stupid government to pull their pants up and take better decisions in the future. She should be a free woman.
Gio
I believe, that our Canadian justice, at the time, had already determine, that for this kind of criminal acts plus the support of the offender would represent the 12 years it was given her.
Since then, she tried to get out before, but was never allowed. After spending the full time given to her, she has the rights to step out and try to live another life, if so is possible.
I believe she paid her due to the Canadian justice, it is up to the stupid government to pull their pants up and take better decisions in the future. She should be a free woman.
Gio
my question
was more like....does she show ( not feel) a little remorse...
I dont think she did....
I think...whats different about her crime....and so unusual...
is that it involves her sister....and after the death ( accidental murder)of her sis..she doesnt show any guilt or remorse ( in her pictures and actions...).....Actually..she went on and participated in the rape and murder of 2 other kids...
and all of this...after the ( murder) of her sister...
This case is very unusual...
Either way...i would probably still fuck her...
actually i say that...but....i dont think i would...even as horny i could get sometimes...
was more like....does she show ( not feel) a little remorse...
I dont think she did....
I think...whats different about her crime....and so unusual...
is that it involves her sister....and after the death ( accidental murder)of her sis..she doesnt show any guilt or remorse ( in her pictures and actions...).....Actually..she went on and participated in the rape and murder of 2 other kids...
and all of this...after the ( murder) of her sister...
This case is very unusual...
Either way...i would probably still fuck her...
actually i say that...but....i dont think i would...even as horny i could get sometimes...
10 reasons i would not fuck homolka.
1) I only have one sister
2)I can t imagine what could turn her on sexually now....too much pressure..
3) mY middle name is Paul....I d be afraid she would find out....and then say what... '' hey my ex...was named Paul...you remind me of him ''
4)would be afraid to hear from her.. '' HEY HONEY I JUST.......THE KIDS''
5)I would be devasted it she said ''NO'' to.. '' Can i cum on your face' ?''
6) thats she would be so great sexually...that i might start to feel a little sympathy for her
7) after i fucked her...she will stick to woman
8)because first of all ..she would not fuck me..
9)if she told me......pay may so much and ill fuck you..
10)... i wonder i much people would be ready to pay to have sex with her...
1) I only have one sister
2)I can t imagine what could turn her on sexually now....too much pressure..
3) mY middle name is Paul....I d be afraid she would find out....and then say what... '' hey my ex...was named Paul...you remind me of him ''
4)would be afraid to hear from her.. '' HEY HONEY I JUST.......THE KIDS''
5)I would be devasted it she said ''NO'' to.. '' Can i cum on your face' ?''
6) thats she would be so great sexually...that i might start to feel a little sympathy for her
7) after i fucked her...she will stick to woman
8)because first of all ..she would not fuck me..
9)if she told me......pay may so much and ill fuck you..
10)... i wonder i much people would be ready to pay to have sex with her...
If the death penalty is not used, then people like Karla Homolka should be put in prison labor camps, working as laborers for the Province. For the men, I am talking about hard labor, working on bridges and roads and doing other jobs that Provincial workers would be doing. You will save some of your ridiculous tax revenue that way. In the case of women like Homolka, what you do is set up a factory where they can make clothes and the like for the Provincial workers. The men, like Bernardo, if not given the death penalty put them on chain gangs fixing some of those potholes on the highways in and out of Montreal. You can also have them painting bridges, etc. Under armed guard of course. If you Quebec natives had such an enterprising penal system maybe your taxes would not be so ridiculously high.
I heard on the news today that Homolka has been corresponding with a male inmate who is in prison for killing his girlfriend. They met when Karla was being transferred to the "prison" in Quebec. Apparently the letters were passed through the system by prison guards and most of them were sexual in nature. He gets out in 2008. I'm wondering if she is looking for a new partner and if there is any way that our so called justice system can prevent further communication between the two of them in the future?
In Canada don't they have a constitutional prohibition like we have in the USA, i.e., 5th amendment to US Constitution, called "double jeopardy", which prevents one from being charged twice with the same crime?
Last edited:
Train,
Here is the text of the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Basically, the so called "double jeopardy" clause, "nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb", precludes a second prosecution on the same offense.
I am not a criminal attorney, but if this same constitutional prohibition existed in Canada, I would certainly argue that if she could have been charged with this crime and wasn't 13 years ago, it might violate both the statute of limitations and any double jeopardy doctrine that exists under the Canadian system. In this regard note that statutes of limitations and double jeopardy both have, at least to some extent, the same underlying policy rationale which is to prevent the assertion of stale claims against a defendant who is not as well equipped to defend against them as he/she would have been had the action/prosecution been timely brought. This is because of the passage of time and resulting loss of evidence, and the dimming of memories and recollections. In the case of double jeopardy, there is the added policy of requiring the State to bring all of its claims in one prosecution, and the double jeopardy rule has been applied when the State has not done this. It should also be noted that in some jurisdictions, such as here in Connecticut, there are some crimes on which there is no statute of limitations.
Here is the text of the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Basically, the so called "double jeopardy" clause, "nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb", precludes a second prosecution on the same offense.
I am not a criminal attorney, but if this same constitutional prohibition existed in Canada, I would certainly argue that if she could have been charged with this crime and wasn't 13 years ago, it might violate both the statute of limitations and any double jeopardy doctrine that exists under the Canadian system. In this regard note that statutes of limitations and double jeopardy both have, at least to some extent, the same underlying policy rationale which is to prevent the assertion of stale claims against a defendant who is not as well equipped to defend against them as he/she would have been had the action/prosecution been timely brought. This is because of the passage of time and resulting loss of evidence, and the dimming of memories and recollections. In the case of double jeopardy, there is the added policy of requiring the State to bring all of its claims in one prosecution, and the double jeopardy rule has been applied when the State has not done this. It should also be noted that in some jurisdictions, such as here in Connecticut, there are some crimes on which there is no statute of limitations.
Last edited:
Lawless,
There is no statute of limitations for murder in Connecticut. In the last few years, in a very well publicized case here, a guy was convicted for the murder of a young woman in New Haven in 1973. I don't believe the suspect was charged until 2001. The evidence against him was DNA evidence that got preserved in some bloody tissues that were kept by the police all of these years.
There are a lot of "mafia boys" hiding in Canada, Lawless. Don't be surprised if Whitey Bulgur is your next door neighbor.
There is no statute of limitations for murder in Connecticut. In the last few years, in a very well publicized case here, a guy was convicted for the murder of a young woman in New Haven in 1973. I don't believe the suspect was charged until 2001. The evidence against him was DNA evidence that got preserved in some bloody tissues that were kept by the police all of these years.
There are a lot of "mafia boys" hiding in Canada, Lawless. Don't be surprised if Whitey Bulgur is your next door neighbor.
Last edited:
Homolka
If there is a god, she will die a horrible death and all the world will be there to witness it... I cannot think of anybody else I know who is living that I deteste more... I have never met this vial, sick, demented bitch, but I hope she burns in hell and as for Paul Bernardo.... fuck him.... he should be shot to death with balls of his own shit....
If there is a god, she will die a horrible death and all the world will be there to witness it... I cannot think of anybody else I know who is living that I deteste more... I have never met this vial, sick, demented bitch, but I hope she burns in hell and as for Paul Bernardo.... fuck him.... he should be shot to death with balls of his own shit....
Mafia Boys
As far as I am concerned these mafia boys can stay in Canada. They were troublemakers down here and we don't need them back. I presume they are spending their illegal earnings and keeping a low profile in Canada, and if so they are likely helping your economy and not bothering anyone. We don't need to have our tax monies spent extraditing and prosecuting these guys, let them stay in hiding in Canada. Whitey Bulgur too. The FBI has been looking for him for 15 years and they still can't find him. He is probably in Canada or Mexico, although it would be easier for him to blend in in Canada.
As far as I am concerned these mafia boys can stay in Canada. They were troublemakers down here and we don't need them back. I presume they are spending their illegal earnings and keeping a low profile in Canada, and if so they are likely helping your economy and not bothering anyone. We don't need to have our tax monies spent extraditing and prosecuting these guys, let them stay in hiding in Canada. Whitey Bulgur too. The FBI has been looking for him for 15 years and they still can't find him. He is probably in Canada or Mexico, although it would be easier for him to blend in in Canada.
Last edited:
Karla Homolka
OK, here is my two cents in reference to that BITCH Karla Homolka. We all know what she did and who she did it too and who she did it with so there is not sence in rehashing that.... My point is this. She was a partner in a hainous crime, a crime that shook the entire Canadian Populous, a crime that nobody will ever forgive her for. Has she served her time? yes she has! Should she be delcared a Dangerous Offender and spend the rest of her misserbale life in prison....YES... Should we as Canadians forgive her for it... NO @#$%ING WAY. Should she be reminded every day for the rest of her life what she did...OF COURSE SHE SHOULD BE REMINDED.
We live in a plural society, this means we are all different in lifestyles, ways of thinking and must be held responsible for our actions.
She assisted in raping and killing three young girls who were no threat to her and Paul Bernardo (spit) one of them her own sister. How fucked up is that?How can such a vial, demented, sick animal be let loose and expect us to accept her into our neighbourhoods where we try to do the best to earn a living and raise families in a safe environment. She should be locked up for the rest of her life.
Did she not take three lives and in a sense lock up the families of her victims in a world of pain and anger....... did she not think what she was doing was wrong? Apparently she didn't, so why would we want to let her out?
Screw her, let her burn in hell
OK, here is my two cents in reference to that BITCH Karla Homolka. We all know what she did and who she did it too and who she did it with so there is not sence in rehashing that.... My point is this. She was a partner in a hainous crime, a crime that shook the entire Canadian Populous, a crime that nobody will ever forgive her for. Has she served her time? yes she has! Should she be delcared a Dangerous Offender and spend the rest of her misserbale life in prison....YES... Should we as Canadians forgive her for it... NO @#$%ING WAY. Should she be reminded every day for the rest of her life what she did...OF COURSE SHE SHOULD BE REMINDED.
We live in a plural society, this means we are all different in lifestyles, ways of thinking and must be held responsible for our actions.
She assisted in raping and killing three young girls who were no threat to her and Paul Bernardo (spit) one of them her own sister. How fucked up is that?How can such a vial, demented, sick animal be let loose and expect us to accept her into our neighbourhoods where we try to do the best to earn a living and raise families in a safe environment. She should be locked up for the rest of her life.
Did she not take three lives and in a sense lock up the families of her victims in a world of pain and anger....... did she not think what she was doing was wrong? Apparently she didn't, so why would we want to let her out?
Screw her, let her burn in hell
Karla a offert sa propre petite soeur à Paul Bernardo, à titre de cadeau de Noël. Elle a ensuite filmé le viol et le meurtre de la pauvre fille. Mom et Vito n'auraient jamais commis ce genre d'atrocité (je crois même qu'ils auraient descendu avec plaisir quiconque aurait proposé pareil supplice pour leur frangine). Ne confondons pas les «simples» meurtriers aux monstres comme Karla.Lawless said:
Similar threads
