We’re just going to overlook the fact that some girls have been blackmailed? Quit and I will tell your family what you truly do for a living
I cannot confirm those girls were working at XO but they were working in agencies
Nice la Presse Article on XO this morning
- Thread starter felixLg
- Start date
We’re just going to overlook the fact that some girls have been blackmailed? Quit and I will tell your family what you truly do for a living
I cannot confirm those girls were working at XO but they were working in agencies
Yup, very sad practice, that they use on the younger girls, quite common with some pimps and agencies especially if the girl is close to her family, and new to business, more vigilant girls don't allow the work to know about their personal life.
What’s good about it? 15 min break between clients and seeing 7-8 clients per day??
They’re not machines. How can they provide a consistently good service under these conditions ?
If the agency owners truly cared about the girls, they give them at least 30 minutes between clients, and make them see max 4-5 clients per day. It would reduce their overall profits, but it’d be better for the girls, the clients and everybody involved.
Unfortunately, it’s a bloodthirsty, money making operation, so most don’t care too much about the girls (I won’t generalize).
My 2 cents.
Fradi,
I do not want to wade too deeply into the agency vs. Indy debate that this news story has spawned and is coursing through many posts in this thread. I have been a customer of both. However there is precedent in Montreal for a business which is essentially a "consortium of indies", behind which either one of them, or some other person, is a "pimp." I am not going to name names or point fingers but this same debate existed 20 years ago as to what is a group of so called indies vs. what is an "agency". Businesses can be set up in myriad ways with myriad ownership structures and revenue apportionments and things may not be as they appear.
It's like a Jeopardy question: "what is a consortium of independent escorts behind which is one person"?
While I liked and agreed with much of what you posted, I am just suggesting that it's not always as black and white as it seems. There is gray in this world.
Last edited:
You are correct however these agencies prey on girls who need fast money and don’t have many options other than prostitution.
It is easy to say they could have left but you don’t make that kind of money waitressing and many of these girls can’t hold down regular jobs.
Agencies are modern day pimps. They are not advertising agencies they are not there to provide decent employment ( how many agencies provide health care, paid vacation etc… or anything that a normal employer does) and their sole interest is money.
I will never be part of this type of exploitation of women by pimps.
I see plenty of agency girls who don't work often, a lot do small shifts when they do work and some even have mandatory 2hours appointments.
And I'm sorry but like cloud said they can walk away if they don't like their working conditions... like anybody else.
I do not think this is correct, this "late fee" refers to if she arrived to the agreed appointment late. (For example, her schedule started at 10am and she arrived at 10:20am). In this case, the client was credited a certain amount due to shortened appt and it came out of the girl's earning.
Also, if for whatever reason the session got dragged longer, the next client's time got shortened, not that the girl got charged "late fee". This doesn't even make sense.
But you are generalizing.
I don't see an issue as long as provider is the one choosing to see 7-8 clients a day, it is that person's decision. Who are you to judge?
There are plenty of girls in several agencies that only work very short shifts once/twice a week. And they are popular girls that get booked instantly. I don't see them getting forced to work long hours.
I agree that XO's predatory behaviors shown in the article is horrible and cannot and should not happen, but to throw all the agencies into the same basket is wrong.
Before escorting, I rented a chair in a tattoo parlor as a piercing artist. I have never, not once, been charged a fee for being late or having to take a day off. The only money I lost was the customers I couldn't see on those days. Never had to pay a fee. They took a cut on every piercing I did do, but they never charged me anything for being late or sick.
There was no mention of proving an emergency, which makes me think even an emergency wouldn't have changed anything. But also. I have a question. If a waitress doesn't show up (or shows up late) to work on a day where 6 large groups reserved tables, does her boss ask her to pay him? 100$ for the day and 80$ per table? Nope. He doesn't. She just doesn't get paid for the time she's not at work. If you're sick and can't go to work do you pay your boss or do you just not get paid?
We should all be appalled indeed
You are correct that it is not always black and white and there are grey areas.
There is nothing grey about any of the agencies they are glorified modern day pimps.
If you are referring to Indy Companions, you are wrong they are all independent Indy’s, I am friends with a few of them and know what they are about and how their set up works.
If you are referring to Unicorns which was run by a well known female escort. Yeah she was what I would call a kinder modern day pimp, but a pimp never the less.
The ladies I have seen are all independent Indy’s and I deal directly with them, I don’t even deal with any that have hired a booker as I will not work through middlemen.
While nobody likes to spend almost double for an hour or more with a lady for me it will always be worth it as I hate pimps.
Not everything is about money and you need to look at yourself in the mirror at the end of the day and live according to your beliefs.
As has been pointed out, at least some were blackmailed into staying. Not so easy to walk away.
Do you realize the double standard in place here ?
The inconvenience on the client side is lost time.
On the SP side, it’s physical assault, harm to their mental health and non consensual encounters.
This is not a service industry like every other. Very few, if not no other industry leaves the SP as vulnerable as this one.
On a slightly different subject, with fear of being identifiable ... I received a call from a number that identified (and that I later confirmed) to be from a defense attorney asking for a so-and-so.
I told him it was the wrong number.
He then asked me how long I had the number which I honestly replied. (Thinking even at the time that it was a weird question)
In retrospect I am wondering if it was to pinpoint the use of my phone. Pre-covid I was dumb... I used my main. I used XO only like ... 3... 4 times since I started?
I am not even sure I want to post this...
I told him it was the wrong number.
He then asked me how long I had the number which I honestly replied. (Thinking even at the time that it was a weird question)
In retrospect I am wondering if it was to pinpoint the use of my phone. Pre-covid I was dumb... I used my main. I used XO only like ... 3... 4 times since I started?
I am not even sure I want to post this...
Where are you guys taking that from? I see girls come and go every week on Euphoria's website, to give one example. Did it ever happened in the history of the industry? Probably. Is it common practice? Really doubt it.
How do you know with certainty that some girls weren’t coerced? Blackmailed? Misled from sugar dating websites? Made to stay because now hooked on expensive substances?
I find you lack empathy.
We are discussing the abuse that has taken place, and that might still happen today, by some agencies, to some providers in the industry. No one here implied that it's common practice.
Yup. There is no excuse in Canada. We have all kinds of ressources. It's all about hedonism and greed. Nothing the father of 17 year old girl mentioned in the article could've done. She would've sneaked around him anyway like a lot of teen girls do.
Was not referring to either. Everyone who was around 2005-2010 knows who I am referring to. Pointless to name names because others had the same or similar structures. I also remember a consortium of "independents" that Tom of blue board was allegedly behind. Not sure of what the truth was on any of it, but the point is nobody knows. We are using labels that in some cases may not be real. The word "independent" is malleable in some cases and may mean something else.
It reminds me of the legal debate between what is an "independent contractor" and what is an ""employee." The average person thinks the Courts in the U.S.A resolve this by what your tax returns or records show. WRONG!!!!!! It's a fact-sensitive control test. An independent contractor truly controls their work. An employee does not. The same test applies in my mind in the escort world.
Last edited:
Similar threads
