Montreal Escorts

Nice la Presse Article on XO this morning

4MTL8

New Member
Feb 4, 2026
1
0
3
47
Not sure if anybody noticed

The lady booker arrested in the article is the owner of Forever.

No wonder she hasn’t been booking for months.

Not all agencies are infallible
Sheila? If not mistaken, she’d be Sam’s sister. Which would have me think he’s still involved in some or form. I was a big fan of XO in their prime years, say 2015-2018. Got to know two of the girls very well during that time. I had one or two sour conversations with Sam and that was it for me.
 

Glyscore

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2020
691
792
93
32
This shit might make me give up on agencies Man....When you think about it, sometimes, this shit felt to good to be true. You could see SPs on XO or forever, some at Sensation that would ask double the Price easly as independant...
 

Cap'tain Fantastic

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2011
5,371
10,177
113
Sheila? If not mistaken, she’d be Sam’s sister. Which would have me think he’s still involved in some or form. I was a big fan of XO in their prime years, say 2015-2018. Got to know two of the girls very well during that time. I had one or two sour conversations with Sam and that was it for me.
Noémie, not Sheila. I don’t even use these agencies and already figured this out, easy and simple maths!
 

LeDodo

The hopeless romantic introvert and metrosexual
Jun 8, 2025
2,100
2,531
113
Sheila? If not mistaken, she’d be Sam’s sister. Which would have me think he’s still involved in some or form. I was a big fan of XO in their prime years, say 2015-2018. Got to know two of the girls very well during that time. I had one or two sour conversations with Sam and that was it for me.
Sour conversation?

Can you elaborate?
 
  • Like
Reactions: EagerBeaver

Fradi

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2019
4,635
8,207
113
Around the corner
So you are saying she booked for both XO and Forever? That reminds me there used to be a poster called "Booker"- had the sense it was a man who had booked for multiple agencies. I wonder what happened to him?
BookerL.
The most obnoxious poster on this board.
When he left or was banned from here don’t know which he was a staple on the Blue board.
I think he was also part owner of one of the agencies as well.
 

Batista Mason

Well-Known Member
Dec 25, 2011
513
375
63
Not sure if anybody noticed

The lady booker arrested in the article is the owner of Forever.

No wonder she hasn’t been booking for months.

Not all agencies are infallible

I noticed that Mia hasn't posted/interacted for a while. Remember when Forever started, she was posting in X (AKA Twitter) about jokes and funny experience with clients. I don't pay attention to this but does anyone knows if she has done booking lately?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allan144

Halloween Mike

The Shape
Apr 19, 2009
5,894
2,831
113
Haddonfield
Not sure if anybody noticed

The lady booker arrested in the article is the owner of Forever.

No wonder she hasn’t been booking for months.

Not all agencies are infallible
Don't any of you remember at some point Forever was closed for a day? Knowing the agency was among the former staff of XO it made sense to me as i knew a bit about the XO story (trough back channels) but was asked to not mention it. And yes i noticed "Mia" was posting a lot on Twitter and at some point it just stopped. Was it when she was busted? i dunno. Recently Twitter been going hard against escorts profiles. Lots of indies i been following for years wich never had any issues have been banned. So probably the Forever and Mia personal profile been axed too, but i do recall there was Mia, Jason and another person wich had profiles linked to Forever.

Out of curiosity i looked at Forever posting history and noticed that today there is no specification on who is booking. In the past there was always a name. 13 pages seem to be the maximum you can see by simply looking at a profile history (you have to manually search for older posts) but i noticed several names like Laura, Sophia, Molly and a few others (all women) with no sign of Mia or Jason.

The truth is if the police wanted to bust all the agencies in Montreal they could had done so a long time ago. They deliberately CHOSE to let them run business. Maybe because to them its easier to keep an eye on it that way and its safer for the women. The question is "will this situation with XO make them change their stance on this?".

Its 2 different domains but i can draw a parrallel, it remind me a bit of illegal downloading. Everytime a website is busted another open up. They may go after the owner of said site (but never after the users) and a new one will take its place. So lets say they would shut down every major agencies who operate "in the public eye". It wouldn't stop prostitution ... we know this. I think it would become even more dangerous for the women who do not want(or can't) go indy and work in agencies. So these agencies are a bit of a compromise with LE. As long as they don't make waves they are not bothered. But XO crossed that line in multiple ways it seem.

I know its easy for me to say this because i already had decided to stay away from Montreal for a little while, but personally i think the smarter move at this moment would be to refrain from booking incalls. Im not saying outcalls is full proof, but it seem safer to me. You are in your hotel room, the only person that goes in your room is the escort herself. Police COULD send an undercover cop that way probably, but that is much more complicated than operating an incall sting. If the incalls of agencies are under surveillance, its much easier for them to do anything. They won't post officers are every hotels in Montreal ...
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
22,058
4,564
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
personally i think the smarter move at this moment would be to refrain from booking incalls. Im not saying outcalls is full proof, but it seem safer to me. You are in your hotel room, the only person that goes in your room is the escort herself. Police COULD send an undercover cop that way probably, but that is much more complicated than operating an incall sting. If the incalls of agencies are under surveillance, its much easier for them to do anything. They won't post officers are every hotels in Montreal ...
It's always been safer to book outcall! Not many of you, even the locals posting here, remember that in the 2000s predominately Montreal agencies were running outcalls. The only one I remember runnnig an incall was called "Le Filles de Mr. Jacques", also known as LFMJ. It was only in the 2010s that the incall agencies rose up: Good Girls, Euphoria, XO and a slew of copycats. They all figured out they could make more money with incalls. However I guess the outcall model and learning from the discretion of their historical precessors now is looking good, all of a sudden?

Are we completely forgetting the history of the business here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fradi and 4MTL8

Halloween Mike

The Shape
Apr 19, 2009
5,894
2,831
113
Haddonfield
It's always been safer to book outcall! Not many of you, even the locals posting here, remember that in the 2000s predominately Montreal agencies were running outcalls.

Are we completely forgetting the history of the business here?
Indeed. When i started, there was very few agencies doing incalls. I don't remember "Les filles de Mr Jacques", must have been before my time. But every agencies of the time exept one was outcall only. Devilish/Girls on Fire, MontrealXXXtase (now XXXclusive), Asservissantes, Satin Dreamz, Mtl Sex City, Woman of Passion and then a few more popped out after. Only Nadya VIP was mainly an incall agency that i recall of. Its Goodgirls who changed the model offering incalls. I think the idea was that incall could be seen as a "bordelo" and was more illegal, at least before C-36 or whatever that was call, Outcall was considered almost entirely safe as long as you didn't made "waves" and remain discreet. Even most hotels never cared.

As i said many times i understand the attraction to the incall model on both client and agency pov (clients save money on room, agency book way more calls) but maybe this "appat du gain" is partly responsible for the current situation. I understand even for escorts, incalls may be better (safer as they are in their environement, no getting out in the hot summer or cold winter times, more money since more calls, no waiting in the car etc) but im sure it may take its toll as well to have to do clients "back to back" with only a 15 min break in between... Outcalls kinda feel "more ethical" to me ... But hey maybe its just my POV.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
22,058
4,564
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
I don't remember "Les filles de Mr Jacques", must have been before my time.
It was an agency that was catering completely to French locals. They had one of the biggest rosters I have ever seen in Montreal. Their website was totally in French and they were at the time (2002-2005) maybe $140/hour. I never bothered with them as I assumed from their website they would have no English speaking bookers or escorts. They didn't even try to get the tourists at that time, they knew the outcall agencies had them. They focused on French locals and the French locals I spoke to at the time told me they were not for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DetectiveDavidMills

RobertNYC

Well-Known Member
Sep 6, 2017
481
365
63
It was an agency that was catering completely to French locals. They had one of the biggest rosters I have ever seen in Montreal. Their website was totally in French and they were at the time (2002-2005) maybe $140/hour. I never bothered with them as I assumed from their website they would have no English speaking bookers or escorts. They didn't even try to get the tourists at that time, they knew the outcall agencies had them. They focused on French locals and the French locals I spoke to at the time told me they were not for me.
I always love your historical view, EB. And I don’t even know if the Eleganza issues back in the day resulted in the type of hysteria with booking agencies we’re seeing on Merb now, right?
 

TheJames101

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2017
1,285
2,278
113
Not sure if anybody noticed

The lady booker arrested in the article is the owner of Forever.

No wonder she hasn’t been booking for months.

Not all agencies are infallible

Interesting - didn't realize "Mia" was Noemie. I knew Forever was a spinoff of XO from when things started to fall apart over there... the new place supposedly being the "ethical" version of XO. Or so it claimed (claims).
 
  • Like
Reactions: DetectiveDavidMills

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
22,058
4,564
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
I always love your historical view, EB. And I don’t even know if the Eleganza issues back in the day resulted in the type of hysteria with booking agencies we’re seeing on Merb now, right?
I don't believe the Eleganza arrest got too much media scrutiny. It did have a thread on MERB, but it came to light MUCH later. I think Joe was running Eleganza while John was in jail so the agency was not actually shut down by LE. It continued for a while after the arrest- maybe months or even a year. At the time, it didn't cause too much of a ripple of concern because John apparently was recruiting some girl who was a minor, her parents found the messages or emails and went to the police. It was never clear if John knew the girl was a minor. This is what my memory is of what occurred - I could be wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RobertNYC

Verbal Kint

Member
Jul 10, 2020
54
47
18
The truth is if the police wanted to bust all the agencies in Montreal they could had done so a long time ago. They deliberately CHOSE to let them run business. Maybe because to them its easier to keep an eye on it that way and its safer for the women. The question is "will this situation with XO make them change their stance on this?".
Think you hit the nail in the right spot.
As you mentioned; it is not gonna stop.
If they do, the business will go underground, we know this and so does LE.

Stick with the ''devil'' you know.

Unless it is a political agenda. Then, who knows. Time will tell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AnthonyAnderson