Hello Btyger,
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070905224343.htm
This article explaning the results of the examination of the brain of Benoit cites repeated concussions as the main cause of his condition. The photos comparing cells in a normal neocortex versus that of Benoit are striking. Here an excerpt from the full text explains the results of repeated concussions over time:
"According to the examinations, Mr. Benoit’s brain exhibited large amounts of abnormal Tau protein, manifested as Neurofibrillary Tangles (NFTs) and Neuropil Threads [NTs]. These represent aggregates of abnormal Tau protein, which are remnants of the cytoskeleton of the brain cells and their connections. Frequent NFTs and NTs were distributed in all regions of the brain including the neocortex, the limbic cortex, subcortical ganglia and brainstem ganglia accompanied by loss of brain cells. Accumulation of abnormal Tau protein in the form of NFTs and NTs in the brain has been confirmed to cause neurodegeneration, cognitive impairment and dementia. There was no other neuropathological evidence for any chronic or acute disorder to explain his clinical symptoms."
There is little or no inference to the impact of steroid use. But it seems reasonable to me that the aggressive tendencies associated with steroid use would make an individual more willing to use the head as a weapon and thus increase the frequency of concussions through an influence in mindset, thus making steroids a psychological motivational contributer if not a direct cause of the condition Benoit suffered from.
What disturbs me most about the death of Benoit, when we look at the conclusions of the autopsy, is that the possible damage to the brain of repeated traumas to the head is no mystery to anyone. Allowing and even encouraging unprotected abuse or attacks to the head in "Professional" Wrestling for entertainment impact to generate more profits has always seemed highly irresponsible and theorectically criminal to me. While the individual participating in sports like boxing, football, and wrestling should be responsible for their own choices, that choice should not absolve professional oragnizations from making responsible regulations to minimize the possibility of serious damage to any part of the body, especially the head. Just because an individual chooses to take the risk of serious head injury in sports that do not use head protection doesn't mean the organization should not be held responsible for the damage. In my view the only reason professional boxing and wrestling do not use head gear is the profit from greater risk and the glamorization of violence and danger. Even if it does not eliminate the danger, the proven reduced risk of serious trauma through effective head gear means it should be mandatory in any "sport" where head impact is inherently frequent. Profits are no excuse for failing to reduce risk. Individal choice absolves no one from being irresponsible whatever the entertainment value to "the lusting mob" or profits to exploitationtists.
Life first,
Korbel
Ps
Why isn't this subject on a Chris Benoit or Sports Tragedies thread.