Here's a guy with some advice on fashion for working women.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRkmES3_rWo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRkmES3_rWo
The SP's I saw recently ranged from mediocre to ugly, despite rave reviews here...
- Thread starter SecretAgentMan
- Start date
- Status
And remember, she took Larry's advice and looked stunning. But she also killed the pride of the Funkhouser's when he injured his pitching arm and could no longer masturbate (he couldn't go left). Larry hooked her up with the now stunning escort and they ran off to Spain and he was trampled in the running of the bulls!!!
Returning to the subject of the post by the OP. I have to agree that facial ratings on MERB are inflated, they are not objective 1-10 ratings but rather subjective and emotional 1-10 ratings that are heavily influenced by the subjective experience that the client had with the SP. On top of that in this blue pill world we live in many "white knights" on MERB slam reviewers who give honest objective ratings that they feel may hurt the SPs feelings. As a result otherwise honest objective reviewers feel afraid to post honest objective ratings.
I don’t understand the reference point of the guy who complains. If one expects 10/10 (beauty pageant standard) be prepared to pay at the range of $1000/h or even more on North America’s market. I think we have it pretty, pretty good for the $200-300/h CAD range in Montreal in comparison to the US. If you want 10/10 for a cheaper price than go to Thailand or Ukraine. So, in my opinion marks are not inflated at all if weighted with Montreal price range, i.e. what you see is what you expect with the price you pay in Montreal.
In simpler terms: you come to a Ford dealership and complain that cars do not look like Ferraris…
In simpler terms: you come to a Ford dealership and complain that cars do not look like Ferraris…
Did anyone check out SAM`s posting history.....not long ,8 posts in 5 years.
Only 1 (negative) review that was followed by 3 pages of mixed comments (similar in a way to this thread) https://merb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?115792-Sofia-Angel-Escorts-(avoid)&p=790232#post790232
Most of the rest of his posts are his almost compulsive search for an ex stripper who was ex Mykaela from Eleganza…….(Hey SAM she is available to-day as an indie if you are ready to spend big bucks.)
Now Mykaela 5 years ago was among the 1% of the prettiest escorts in Montreal.
Compared to her many escorts to-day would be considered average or below average..
It would certainly help if he posted links to the review threads of the women he saw. Or at least tell us how many were in the top10 of the best of 2018.
Only 1 (negative) review that was followed by 3 pages of mixed comments (similar in a way to this thread) https://merb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?115792-Sofia-Angel-Escorts-(avoid)&p=790232#post790232
Most of the rest of his posts are his almost compulsive search for an ex stripper who was ex Mykaela from Eleganza…….(Hey SAM she is available to-day as an indie if you are ready to spend big bucks.)
Now Mykaela 5 years ago was among the 1% of the prettiest escorts in Montreal.
Compared to her many escorts to-day would be considered average or below average..
It would certainly help if he posted links to the review threads of the women he saw. Or at least tell us how many were in the top10 of the best of 2018.
Then write your review and move on.
You've got to suck it up and write a review. I personally, have a tough time writing a negative review for someone that shows up and is not what I want looks wise but provides an outstanding performance. I wrote a negative review for a girl a few years ago and I offended a few white knights of this girl. One in particular blasted me for it. I also alienated the agency and that was the last time I used them ( I hate this part) Oh well. She was clearly not in the mood. I got a few PMs from guys that wrote glowing reviews in the past who said agreed with me: She no longer gave a shit. I have been blasted on other forums for paying too much money in Germany and driving up the prices and on the same site I am blasted for paying too little in Brazil and fucking low caliber women. I think it's ironic.
I remember coming to Montreal and getting stood-up by an Indy and then my favorite agency sent a girl over, dressed plain, with no make-up and not much of a personality. She was great in the sack, though. I talked to one of the bookers the next day and I told him "this is not what I come to Montreal for." He said "she is definitely from the B team." I was surprised that guys on the forum favored this girl. Her lack of make-up was called "natural" in the forum and her manner of appearance was "girl next door." My take away was that some guys preferred this look.
The parties were great. I am still working off my TDL from girls I met at the parties. The parties were like going to Brazil and the manager saying Meninas. Apresentação and they come out and introduce themselves one at a time. I also prefer the FKKs and Sauna Clubs where you change into a robe and bath slippers and grab a drink at the bar or poolside and wait for the ladies to walk by and interview them until you find one or two of 50 or so that you want to session with. But this is Montreal and the agencies are a bit of a blind draw. Instead, you get a 18-24 year old French schoolgirl...something that you cannot get in France!
Oh, and by the way, many of those hot girls at the FKK arrive and go out the door looking average to below average in my opinion. They fix themselves up for customers.
I liked it better when the agencies like GoodGirls used non-touched cell phone photos of the girls or when John of Eleganza took photos of the girls in bra and panties and heels. These were photos that were an accurate representation of what you were going to get when you opened the hotel door.
You've got to suck it up and write a review. I personally, have a tough time writing a negative review for someone that shows up and is not what I want looks wise but provides an outstanding performance. I wrote a negative review for a girl a few years ago and I offended a few white knights of this girl. One in particular blasted me for it. I also alienated the agency and that was the last time I used them ( I hate this part) Oh well. She was clearly not in the mood. I got a few PMs from guys that wrote glowing reviews in the past who said agreed with me: She no longer gave a shit. I have been blasted on other forums for paying too much money in Germany and driving up the prices and on the same site I am blasted for paying too little in Brazil and fucking low caliber women. I think it's ironic.
I remember coming to Montreal and getting stood-up by an Indy and then my favorite agency sent a girl over, dressed plain, with no make-up and not much of a personality. She was great in the sack, though. I talked to one of the bookers the next day and I told him "this is not what I come to Montreal for." He said "she is definitely from the B team." I was surprised that guys on the forum favored this girl. Her lack of make-up was called "natural" in the forum and her manner of appearance was "girl next door." My take away was that some guys preferred this look.
The parties were great. I am still working off my TDL from girls I met at the parties. The parties were like going to Brazil and the manager saying Meninas. Apresentação and they come out and introduce themselves one at a time. I also prefer the FKKs and Sauna Clubs where you change into a robe and bath slippers and grab a drink at the bar or poolside and wait for the ladies to walk by and interview them until you find one or two of 50 or so that you want to session with. But this is Montreal and the agencies are a bit of a blind draw. Instead, you get a 18-24 year old French schoolgirl...something that you cannot get in France!
Oh, and by the way, many of those hot girls at the FKK arrive and go out the door looking average to below average in my opinion. They fix themselves up for customers.
I liked it better when the agencies like GoodGirls used non-touched cell phone photos of the girls or when John of Eleganza took photos of the girls in bra and panties and heels. These were photos that were an accurate representation of what you were going to get when you opened the hotel door.
The reference point is: why is it weighted at all? Your opinion can easily be written as, the marks are completely inflated if reviewers would stop weighting them with the Montreal price range.
And I don't even agree with "what you see is what you expect with the price", because within the same agencies for very similar prices there are very large differences of "what you see".
I agree with ikea1999. I can very objectively rate, facial appearance, bodily appearance, service and personality/chemistry for myself without mixing them but I don't share those publicly for exactly the reason he listed.
I certainly do a appreciate the value of the market. I also do appreciate all the SPs who I've met in Montreal.
But your simpler terms is a disservice to SPs like Lea, Shelly, Sonia who actually are Ferraris at similar price points.
I read your reviews and I respect your opinion, because unlike the op, you have written actual reviews of clearly identified escorts. Also, some of your reviews are positive. So you seem like someone whose reviews are worth paying attention to. Keep up the good work. :thumb:
So you normally book girls who have low rated faces? Can you name a girl who is DDG and whose reviews never mention that they are DDG? That is an inherently silly statement. If a girl has 20 or 30 reviews on MERB, they are going to talk about her face and if her face is gorgeous, reviewers are going to say it. What the hell is the point of writing a review of an escort of you don't comment on how she looks and how she provides service?
3 reviews wouhou so you are an expert!!! men you are just a newbie. no offense just fucking assume it.
This is the reason i never rate girl... to avoid such stupid statement as these.
cheers,
Well personally its a look i like a lot. I mean not the "trashy whore" look, like if she painted her eyes herself while her hand was shaking because she was in need of her drugs. Sure you know what i mean. But good well done makie up, fake breast and stripper look, i totally love it. BUT its not something i will expect from agency girls too much as it does not suit there "ways of working". Like i said they see around 3-4 guys per evening usually, maybe more (depending if there is multi-hours meeting). This mean coming out of there cloathes and putting them back on many times, jumping in the shower many times while having to put up there hair to avoid wetting them. Also some guys like me like to indulge in extras, so obviously if she took 30/45 minutes to do her make up, no way she will let you cum near that... lol. And whats the point of parfum when you jump in the shower many times an evening.
That being says i see less and less fake breast in agency roster and i hope its not something that will disapear lol. I love this look when done right. I know it probably comes from my porn fantasies or whatever but i love it
But it seem to be less popular with older guys probably because they like the fantasy of seeing "barely legal" young girls that looks younger. Looks more innocent i supose.As for the cloathing in winter, well once i got to see a movie at the theatre, i won a prize (a poster) and it was snowy outside, didn't wanted to damage it and i had a long walk to my cousin's place, so i took my jacket off and used it to protect it. I had just a tshirt under. It was not a cold evening for winter, maybe -5 or so. At first i was like "its fine... im not freezing or anything" but by the time i arrived there... ouch. And i was sick for 1 week and half afterward. So yeah it does can make you sick... lol
Personally when i have cloathing request like tank tops for exemple (love this), i always tell the agency or indy that its fine if she wear a hoodie on top of it, its winter after all. Just take it off when you arrive
Yes we pay for a service but have some compassion guys lol.
As for reviews, yes the white knighting is real, its no secret. It has discourage lots of guys from reviewing and its a shame. I don't like when guys are plain mean with escorts without good reasons, but i think a review should be "as it was" and they should be honest. There is ways of writing anyway. If you didn't find her pretty, you don't have to say "man she was ugly as hell" , you can say it with class. But the most important part of a review for me is always the service, as i know beauty look depend on peoples, even with "standards" .
Anyway...
Oh and thanks for the nice words on my previous post guys.
Sorry Julia, but a sexy dress will *always* be way sexier than pants. I like to see some legs in any of the SPs/MPs I see, and usually request it (along with high heels).
I get your point about the winter and the cold, etc and don't expect this at that time if its an outcall. But as a client if I made the request (and it wasn't possible), I'd at least want to know about it in advance.
Agree to disagree. I prefer skin tight pants, show forms
And don't you worry, you will see her legs shorter after 
Doesnt remove from the fact pants *can* be sexy, and some dresses are really ugly. A dress is not always sexier than pants and I could show you many examples. Though, for the gazillionth time, If someone requests a dress I will wear one and anyways I already wear dresses to 98% of my outcalls (that part that you all missed, who can actually read here lol?). I'll explain my point in russian if nobody gets it lmao all I'm saying is Брюки могут быть сексуальными, и вы не можете ожидать, что каждая девушка будет носить платье, когда холодно
I really only asked this question because the day before asking I went to an outcall in tight jeans (anyways I have a habit of changing into lingerie in bathroom when I arrive, except on longer dates where I might keep my clothes on longer). But then I asked my client what he thought about it and he said it was totally fine so... whatever.
Some peeps even prefer tight pants (Hey Mike!! If we see each other this year I'll have tight leggings/yoga pants and a band shirt ;p)
i havent bothered to read this whole thread but would like to add my 2 cents based upon the op. my perspective is based upon someone who lives in upstate ny and visits montreal a half dozen times a year. first the review boards in my area of ny are totally unreliable in their description of the escorts. i cant believe the glowing reviews given to women who i would not bother to visit even if it were free. i dont know whether it is because the standards here are so low here or whether the board is populated by shills. In contrast, i find merb to be very reliable. In general, i have found the women to be just as good or even better than described (maybe i have just been lucky.) in fact, on more than one occasion i have commented to an escort that they were much better looking than their pictures. of course there are exceptions to this but i have rarely encountered them. i am thankful for this board and montreal's beautiful women
Both of you Gentlemen are right. I’m now looking at Indipendant girls age 27 - 33 . The agency younger girls are simply not into it.
No charm . No sense of humour and very little personality.
^^^^^^^ MSC has older ladies and was always impressed with them, the main reason I changed agencies was they are not incall. Probably give them a try again next t8me I am back.
Some dresses are ugly...and conversely some pants can be ugly too. But what I'm saying is the best dress will always outshine the "best" pants. It's a preference for me, but if possible I want to see some leg. Pants can't offer that. I'm also not such a "butt" guy, so tight jeans/pants isn't that much of a big deal to me (although I can appreciate a nice ass nonetheless).
I am sitting here scratching my head trying to figure out where SAM is finding all these ugly women in Montreal? I know that James has hotties and I trust the guy. I thought if a girl isn't booked to a certain percentage of the time, he lets them go. Has this changed?
I'm with Gll. I belonged to some boards down south (Sweet Dixie Forums was one of them) where these guys gave pigs that I wouldn't fuck for free rave reviews. I also know of some of the girls I generously gave a 6 for looks get 8's and 9's. Meanwhile, the young girls I see in Montreal were getting 7's in TER and I thought some of the girls like Liz, Alexis, and Nicky/Talia were on a scale of 1 - 10 about a ~10,000!!!!
I think in the States, A girl can get rated a 7+ if she is not law enforcement.
I just wonder if this is a guy with an axe to grind against MERB? We have ass kissers and we have white knights and we even had a few guys that were secretly pimping for the girl that they were reviewing but Montreal girls are pretty darned good. Hell, I 've seen Montreal girls that I would call 10's I see them again 6 months to a year later and I would say they are a 7 at best. Maybe I should accuse myself of being a shill? But I don't know...I still have photos of Nicky/Talia in her yoga pants at GG#3...now someone tell me that she wasn't a 10,000 that magical night!
So, what you're saying is...that you're Russian? (just kidding). Some people skim over posts rather than actually read them.
On the pants versus dress debate: we don't all have the same preferences. Some providers look great in pants/tights eg Julia in those red bottoms (were they tights?) or Amanda in jeans. Some of us prefer short skirts, others long skirts, others body hugging dresses. In my case, in depends of my mood and in whom I am seeing. It is never a deal-breaker, but I could understand how it could be for some clients. As long as the client expresses their position, the provider is free to consent or refuse. I don't see the problem.
- Status
Similar threads
