You are right on this point. Some super educated and high IQ are either non caring, idiot or, as ted Cruz and Josh Hawley, just playing dirty politic and of bad faith.
The Trump Crime Family
- Thread starter Doc Holliday
- Start date
Ivanka too, even though she is beautiful and has big fake breasts.
Beauty does not forgive everything.
Donald Trump ‘refusing’ to pay Rudy Giuliani legal fees: report - National | Globalnews.ca
Rudy Giuliani's legal fees are allegedly $20,000 per day, an amount the lawyer has disputed.
globalnews.ca
Donald Trump ‘refusing’ to pay Rudy Giuliani legal fees.
Trump should fire him, he's the specialist in this field.
Giuliani as a New Yorker, must have known of Trump's penchant for stiffing and having attended the latter's rallies must have heard the snake story repeatedly and realized that the raconteur was the snake. If he didn't protect himself with a hefty retainer, he deserves to go hungry.Donald Trump ‘refusing’ to pay Rudy Giuliani legal fees: report - National | Globalnews.ca
Rudy Giuliani's legal fees are allegedly $20,000 per day, an amount the lawyer has disputed.
Donald Trump ‘refusing’ to pay Rudy Giuliani legal fees.
Trump should fire him, he's the specialist in this field.
Questions for the lawyers here :
1) If a client is not destitute and chooses to break the contract between his attorney and himself by not paying, does attorney client privilege still apply?
2) Lawyers can be disbarred for breaking attorney client privilege. However, if lawyers have already been disbarred, are they customarily penalized for breaking attorney client privilege? In other words, can they be sued for damages or even prosecuted criminally?
Last edited:
The Trump-Giuliani rift was entirely predictable and completely hilarious. Two incompetent, lying jerks on a mission for fools. What was Rudy's record in the lawsuits he brought for Trump? Last I heard, he won one (a VERY insignificant one) and lost 64. For that he charged $20,000 a day. Seem slightly pricey, doesn't it? Of course, if Rudy had any sense he would have known that Trump is famous for not paying his debts WHATEVER they amount to.
I guess when it costs you $130,000 to get laid (the price that Donnie paid for his moment of bliss with Stormy), you have to be careful with your money. Nice to see that Stormy was one of the FEW who ever collected...but she should have charged a lot more for what was undoubtedly a DEEPLY troubling experience with Donnie-boy. She must have had to shower for DAYS after the encounter...and that would just be to remove the orange makeup that seeped out of his flabby face.
I guess when it costs you $130,000 to get laid (the price that Donnie paid for his moment of bliss with Stormy), you have to be careful with your money. Nice to see that Stormy was one of the FEW who ever collected...but she should have charged a lot more for what was undoubtedly a DEEPLY troubling experience with Donnie-boy. She must have had to shower for DAYS after the encounter...and that would just be to remove the orange makeup that seeped out of his flabby face.
Following last year’s efforts to ban Trump Administration officials from speaking on campus, Harvard University students are now circulating a petition that calls for revoking degrees from Trump supporters and aides who attended the elite Ivy League institution, FOX Business has learned.
The petition targets White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), and Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX).
It's a very idea.
Everybody agrees that good ideas should be implemented. The problem is, who gets to decide what ideas are good. You rarely provide your own opinion on articles you post. So I'm curious here, do you think it's a good idea that Harvard revoke the degrees of Trump supporters or do you think it's a good idea that Harvard should simply have the right to revoke degrees as they see fit now and in the future for this or for any other reason that the school leadership at the time decides. Is your suggestion not a slippery slope towards the latter? And if your support is only for the former, how do you plan on limiting Harvard's abilities beyond this context? What collective body should make this decision? Should revocation conditions be made part of the student handbook so current students know how they should think and behave in the future? Actually, more than a handbook, it should be in the university's constitution. Is there such a thing? But then how do we think about who amends this constitution in the future? There is so much detail that I would like to know about this brilliant idea.
The “cancel culture” sounds like a great idea until they come after you.
Perhaps government should learn from these universities and take it a step further.
Why not revoke US citizenship from all those who are deemed to be racist, anti democratic and generally don’t have left leaning ideals.
There would be no need for walls, simply strip them of citizenship and deport them.
Why not revoke US citizenship from all those who are deemed to be racist, anti democratic and generally don’t have left leaning ideals.
There would be no need for walls, simply strip them of citizenship and deport them.
It won't work. Where ever you deport this group to, they will create a thriving republic of economic and cultural conservatism. This will springboard into free market capitalism, incubate corporate development through deregulation and labor union restrictions. They will provide for gun rights so they can protect what they have from the inside and support military spending to defend their borders. Over time, they will become a global economic power.
But then, someone here will start a thread about this terrible new republic and begin posting ridiculous cartoons. They will then again start to tell them how they should live their lives and how they should think. Then, while concurrently criticizing them for every aspect of who they are, they will want their wealth that was derived from hard work and distribute it amongst themselves.
But then, someone here will start a thread about this terrible new republic and begin posting ridiculous cartoons. They will then again start to tell them how they should live their lives and how they should think. Then, while concurrently criticizing them for every aspect of who they are, they will want their wealth that was derived from hard work and distribute it amongst themselves.
So you think that every thing is perfect in USA and all other democratic societies are inferior !
When a country elect as president a Donald Trump I don't think it is as marvelousas you think.
And no need for elections either, they only serve to sow division and discord. Excellent idea all around.
A completely deportable offence.
Deport all 70+ million of them, there is no room in the US for those that don’t have leftist ideals.
PC must be protected at all costs. The least they could do to redeem themselves is post minimum ten daily offensive cartoons about the Orange one.
No, and Yes (although the Democracy Index disagrees).
But nothing in the posts of the Three Musketeers here is about what is or isn't perfect in the USA, as that debate is far too complex for this thread. It's strictly raging venomous hatred towards one man and almost half a country. Furthermore, you and your brethren's posts are mostly emotional rants, filled with angry textual undertones and name calling (like moron and cry-baby) that make it difficult for me to distinguish you from the man you hate ... when it comes to how he speaks and degrades those that don't support or agree with him.
Cancel culture = bad idea.
Cancel traitors like Trump, Cruz and Hawley = good idea.
Cancel insane rightwing lies and propaganda appealing to violent, treasonous, braindead rightwing morons = excellent idea.
Cancel traitors like Trump, Cruz and Hawley = good idea.
Cancel insane rightwing lies and propaganda appealing to violent, treasonous, braindead rightwing morons = excellent idea.
So cancel culture is ok as long as it is the right person or group calling the shots.
Yep that just about sums it up doesn’t it.
Of course it is to be decided by above average intelligent people not brain dead right wing morons.
Yep that just about sums it up doesn’t it.
Of course it is to be decided by above average intelligent people not brain dead right wing morons.
You can be right wing like most republicans without being white supremasist or Q anon conspirationist propaging crazy beliefs.
Maybe so in theory, but in real life the risk is unacceptable, so like @Fradi said, all rightwingers must be preemptively deported.
Similar threads
