Doc Holliday, I often agree with you but gotta diverge on this one. Yes the electoral college is outdated, but only in an insane world would a guy as clueless and odious as Trump lose the popular vote by 3,000,000 out of 120,000,000+. Trump was so bad that newspapers that hadn't picked a Democrat for president in nearly a century picked Hillary over him. For some people, there was no objective thought process. Tribalism played a big part: Hillary was a Democrat, Trump was a "Republican" (despite being a Democrat for years) and that was that even though there was a huge disparity between their command of government policy and governance. Gone are the days where we evaluate candidates individually even while acknowledging that we have political leanings.
If Hillary got the same votes as Obama, she certainly didn't get them in the right place. While a vote is a vote, an excess of Democratic votes in California doesn't alter the outcome that Hillary would carry that state. On the other hand, if a fraction of the excess Hillary votes had been cast in Florida or Wisconsin, perhaps history would be different. To that point, for example, African-American turnout in Florida was down. (Hey we get the government we deserve. When a man nakedly pandering to the KKK isn't enough to motivate potential victims of the KKK to stand against him come voting time, we deserve it. Any black person that says Trump is racist but failed to vote when they could can kindly shut the fuck up). As for the Russians, they absolutely tried to undermine our democracy but it's highly questionable the effect was significant. Sure, the swing state psychwarfare likely caused some to vote for Trump. Sadly, that doesn't explain how so many people pulled the lever for easily the most unfit person in any political office, much less the President of the United States.