That's funny but i did not know Trump was running against GWB or anyone else, why on earth would he bring them up? Kids locked in cars? Drunk drving deaths? Really? Well those sad deaths have always been around unfortunately but isis, not so much. Sort of blows your theory out the door, eh?
What theory are you referring to? I didn’t propose any theory.
I provided a sample of the individuals Trump didn’t mention during the debate when he made the comment on her effectiveness. He didn’t mention them. It’s not theory.
I asked how many Americans were killed by ISIS in the US vs number of Americans killed by drunk driving or left in a hot vehicle during the summer. Also not theory.
That line of reasoning you propose is saying that since Clinton is the one running for the office of POTUS, her effectiveness for getting things done should be evaluated as if she was in COMPLETE control of the all three branches of the Federal government during that time AND not on the reality that she is a single senator out of 100 and that the other 99 senators, 435 Representatives, Bush Jr, and various SCOTUS judges might have had a different opinion than her. To subscribe to Trump’s line of reasoning on this topic is effectively stating that Clinton wasn’t effective in her prior offices because she didn’t have the ability to mind control.
Again, Trump is not running against senators per se (even though i am sure he has mentioned many of them but his main target is a witch) so why would he name them? Decrease in unemployment is such a joke, the real figures do not include those who have given up looking and likely does not include those on welfare, give me a break.
I'm keeping an open mind. Which figures should I be looking at?
As stated previously in this thread, I don't prefer Clinton but between Clinton and Trump, the later, IMO, would be even worse. Better the devil you know than the devil you don't.
