It's amazing how much mis-information gets spread around. In this thread, for example, we have a post yesterday that a Saudi national was in custody. We now know that's not true. A little ways up this page, we have a tale of a young boy who was killed while his father was running the marathon. We now know that, while his father had run the marathon in prior years, he was not in the race this year. The New York post was running a story on their website that 20 people had been killed.I'll say it again: "The FBI always get their man."
It was my thinking at first that, of course, this was an act of terrorism, but then I read this afternoon that it depends on how you define terrorism. If, by definition, terrorism has a political or ideological motive, then we really don't know if this was an act of terrorism. We do certainly know that it was a heinous criminal act.
As for the FBI always getting their man, well...two writers from the Boston Globe, Kevin Cullen and Shelley Murphy have written an excellent biography of Whitey Bulger, the Boston crime lord and it seems he operated with a substantial amount of protection from the FBI. Doc, I'm quite sure that you saw the movie "The Departed," no? The Jack Nicholson part was basically the persona of Whitey Bulger and the Matt Damon part was based on the FBI officer, John Callahan. While the movie ends differently and Damon was a state cop rather than a G-man, both Callahan and Bulger are now in jail, Bulger awaiting trial, Callahan serving 50 years. Corruption and the FBI are no strangers.
As for Oswald being found guilty, not so. He was killed by Jack Ruby days after the assassination and never stood trial. There's little doubt that Oswald was involved, but there's a lot of doubt as to whether or not he acted alone.