Hello all,
Now remember, all of the below is based on reports (easily Googled)...as reliable or questionable as they might be.
As feared, the rush to get out the "Big News" first has resulted in the expected consequences, the general problem being unfounded assertions, often on the most important details. While the New York Post has been one of the worse, a lot of reputable news service agencies on both sides of the political scales have made critical mistakes. The latest seems to be the report that a suspect has been arrested. Like you I'm not sure what or who to believe, but many media outlets that reported the arrest are now backing off and/or retracting their statements.
If reporting is accurate, and who can know with all of these mistakes what is, innocent people are paying a heavy cost for the rushed publishing of misinformation. The error in reporting that a Saudi was either a "suspect" or "person of interest" has lead to alleged beatings of men that had an Arab appearance. If true, one person confronted another and asked if he was an Arab. When the man spoke honestly in a free country he was beaten. No surprise there since Arabs/Muslims are the favorite scapegoats for anything resembling a bombing.
Some might say this is understandable given 911 and the frequency of Mideast terrorism in the news. I don't, and its very sad to see people lashing out because of common broad stereotyping. No doubt some people are rationalizing such attacks. I see it playing into the hands of the real bombers giving them some of the things they want... like social disruption (fear) and biased retaliation (racist revenge).
Keep in mind this from the link in post #45:
..."the image of the two men standing together wearing the same clothes and carrying heavy backpacks and wearing credentials suggests they may have been involved in a drill or in the actual attack."
I'm only suggesting like the title...it's a question mark.
Merlot