Sweet Angle Smile
Montreal Escorts

Weapons in USA

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,466
1,399
113
Casablanca
Writer and data analyst Steve Sailer points out that recent CDC data on deaths by homicides reveals that the gun problem in the U.S. is not caused by the guns themselves but by certain people who are misusing the guns, specifically young black males.

*NH=non hispanic

cdc data.png



On May 10, 2022, the CDC issued a new report on gun homicides and gun suicides in 2020. Not in 2021, which ended over 4 months ago, but in 2020, which ended over 16 months ago.

Still, 2020 was an important year, so I pulled up the CDC’s Wonder database and graphed the number of male 15-34 year old victims of gun homicides by race by month from 1999 to 2020. Why youngish males?

Unlike the FBI, which tries to count both victims and perpetrators of murders, the CDC records only victims of homicides. (But the CDC handles Hispanics much more adeptly than the FBI does.)

So one problem with the CDC’s demographics is it doesn’t tell you the demographics of the perps. But by focusing on victims in the lively sector — young men — you can get a pretty good sense of who is doing the shooting as well.

And it sure looks to me like America has a young black male shooting problem, both in general and especially during the current Racial Reckoning following George Floyd’s death. It would seem like the Establishment consensus that the biggest problem facing young black men was too much law and order has definitively been tested in the real world since 5/25/20.

But you won’t hear that from the CDC, at least not in those words.

Highlights from the CDC report:

Results: From 2019 to 2020, the overall firearm homicide rate increased 34.6%, from 4.6 to 6.1 per 100,000 persons.
The overall age-adjusted firearm suicide rate among persons aged ≥10 years remained nearly level between 2019 and 2020 (7.9 and 8.1 per 100,000 persons, respectively [relative change = 1.5%]) …
However, drug overdose deaths were up dramatically in 2020, likely due to drug dealers adding fentanyl to other recreational drugs to enhance the effects. (E.g., George Floyd might well have not known his meth had fentanyl in it. But nobody is supposed to ever be reminded of Floyd’s fentanyl ingestion, even though it might save a lot of lives.)

Young persons, males, and Black persons consistently have the highest firearm homicide rates, and these groups experienced the largest increases in 2020. These increases represent the widening of long-standing disparities in firearm homicide rates. For example, the firearm homicide rate among Black males aged 10–24 years was 20.6 times as high as the rate among White males of the same age in 2019, and this ratio increased to 21.6 in 2020. …
Gun homicide victimizations increased 39.5% among blacks from 2019 to 2020, 28.4% among non-Hispanic whites, 27.0% among American Indians, 25.8% among Hispanics, but fell 4.2% among Asians despite Trump uttering the genocidal words “China virus.”

The findings of this study underscore the importance of comprehensive strategies that can stop violence now and in the future by addressing factors that contribute to homicide and suicide, including the underlying economic, physical, and social inequities that drive racial and ethnic disparities in multiple health outcomes. For example, policies that enhance economic and household stability (e.g., temporary assistance to families, child care subsidies, tax credits, housing assistance, and livable wages) can reduce family poverty and other risk factors for homicide and suicide (e.g., family stress and substance use) (3,4,12–14). Communities can also implement locally driven approaches that address physical and social environments that contribute to violence and other inequities, with the potential for immediate benefits. Approaches such as enhancing and maintaining green spaces and the remediation of vacant buildings can reduce opportunities for violence and promote positive social interactions. These approaches have been associated with significant reductions in risk for firearm violence (13,15). For example, a study in a major U.S. city found that restoration of vacant lots (e.g., cleaning up debris or adding vegetation) was associated with significant reductions in firearm assaults, with the largest reduction (29%) in areas with the highest poverty (15).

Or, you know, we could go back to policing like on May 24, 2020 and try to get illegal handguns out of the pockets and glove compartments of criminals. That might have a more immediate effect than, say, enhancing and maintaining green spaces. Not that those aren’t good things to do, but when you find your hole is 34.6% deeper than last year, the first thing to do is to stop digging.

You can see the Ferguson Effect take hold in 2015-2016, then the Pax Sessions of 2018 after the Justice Department stopped egging on criminals like the Obama Justice Department had during the Black Lives Matter era after Ferguson. But then black males started getting restless in 2019, and more so in the winter of 2020, then the doors blew off in June 2020 with murders peaking in July 2020 and remaining extraordinarily high for the rest of the year.

In contrast, the CDC and the press doesn’t want to report the CDC’s own numbers by month so they can blame the pandemic rather than focus attention on the racial reckoning.

cdc 02.png
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: purplem

Jazzman1218

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2021
1,053
2,709
113
78
Writer and data analyst Steve Sailer points out that recent CDC data on deaths by homicides reveals that the gun problem in the U.S. is not caused by the guns themselves but by certain people who are misusing the guns, specifically young black males.

*NH=non hispanic

View attachment 42948






In contrast, the CDC and the press doesn’t want to report the CDC’s own numbers by month so they can blame the pandemic rather than focus attention on the racial reckoning.

View attachment 42949
People kill people and guns make that killing easier and faster.
 

Jazzman1218

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2021
1,053
2,709
113
78
Guns allows ppl to defend yourself. More on that. I posted an article in the Trudeau gun ban.
So in 2020 in the US, where we have more guns than people, over 45,000 people were killed by guns. How often are guns needed to defend their owners? Doesn't a civilized society have law enforcement and non-lethal methods to defend ourselves?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gaby and purplem

Jazzman1218

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2021
1,053
2,709
113
78

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,466
1,399
113
Casablanca
...How often are guns needed to defend their owners? Doesn't a civilized society have law enforcement and non-lethal methods to defend ourselves?
Because of leftist anti-police attitudes and policies, especially over the last 10 years, Americans are more in need than ever to own guns for self-defense.

The police in most major American cities have been attacked, disrespected, defunded, undermined, frustrated and blocked from doing their jobs by liberal politicians and prosecutors and no-cash--bail laws. Most of those cities, such as New York, LA, Chicago, Philadelphia etc. are managed by liberal Democrat mayors with liberal prosecutors and those are the places which have huge crime problems.

When government refuses to fulfill its most basic responsibility of upholding law and order, then a civilized society allows its citizens to do whatever is necessary to defend themselves.


A new report shows that Democrat policies in cities and counties are responsible for rising crime rates in “their otherwise red states.”

The Heritage Foundation today released a 19-page report titled “The Blue City Murder Problem” that includes analysis on crime data and explores who is responsible for rising crime throughout the U.S. (The Daily Signal is Heritage’s multimedia news organization.)

“Those on the Left know that their soft-on-crime policies have wreaked havoc in the cities where they have implemented those policies,” authors Charles Stimson, Zack Smith, and Kevin D. Dayaratna, who are scholars in the Edwin Meese III Center for Judicial and Legal Studies at The Heritage Foundation, wrote in the report.

The authors continued:

It is not hard to understand why ‘reforms’ such as ending cash bail, defunding the police, refusing to prosecute entire categories of crimes, letting thousands of convicted felons out of prison early, significantly cutting the prison population, and other ‘progressive’ ideas have led to massive spikes in crime—particularly violent crime, including murder—in the communities where those on the Left have implemented them.
As of June 2022, the top three cities with the highest homicide rates include Chicago, with 304 homicides; Philadelphia, with 240 homicides; and New York, with 197 homicides, the report said.

The report also highlighted that 27 of the top 30 cities with the highest murder rates as of June 2022 were run by Democratic mayors, except for Lexington, Kentucky, and Jacksonville, Florida, which are run by Republican mayors, and Las Vegas, which has an independent mayor...
 

Jazzman1218

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2021
1,053
2,709
113
78
Because of leftist anti-police attitudes and policies, especially over the last 10 years, Americans are more in need than ever to own guns for self-defense.

The police in most major American cities have been attacked, disrespected, defunded, undermined, frustrated and blocked from doing their jobs by liberal politicians and prosecutors and no-cash--bail laws. Most of those cities, such as New York, LA, Chicago, Philadelphia etc. are managed by liberal Democrat mayors with liberal prosecutors and those are the places which have huge crime problems.

When government refuses to fulfill its most basic responsibility of upholding law and order, then a civilized society allows its citizens to do whatever is necessary to defend themselves.

So by that "logic" guns are needed for self defense only in the big cities, right?
 

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,466
1,399
113
Casablanca
...guns are needed for self defense only in the big cities, right?
People may need guns wherever leftist politicians and prosecutors have made it difficult for the police to do their job. These days such places tend to be big cities but people in more rural areas might need guns, because the police might be far aways when needed. Fortunately, the United States Constitution guarantees Americans, wherever they live, the right be own a gun. Ironically the same Democrat politicians that have weakened the police and coddled criminals have tried to take away the right of Americans to own guns.
 

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
8,480
6,388
113
So in 2020 in the US, where we have more guns than people, over 45,000 people were killed by guns. How often are guns needed to defend their owners? Doesn't a civilized society have law enforcement and non-lethal methods to defend ourselves?
Under the Liberal plan, they want to defund the police and remove mandatory sentencing like Justin Trudeau did. Something is totally off here. Plus you want to put your faith in police? Someone breaks into your home, do you want to hide like a mouse or have the ability to defend yourself? How many more examples do you need? Uvalde? The Vaughan shooter? The shooter at Wal-Mart? The problem is people wait for the police like the Liberals say to do but in the that time it takes them to come the damage is done as we have seen. To the Liberals ideology is more important then practical solutions. The Liberals make it easier for criminals to commit crime. Your logic is also weird, the US has about 286 million registered vehicles in the US, the NHTSA estimates that about 9,560 people died in a car accident in the US in 2022. With Liberal logic all cars should be banned? Society can still be civilized with the right to bear arms. In Canada even non-lethal methods of defense is prohibited, brass knuckels, bear spray, pepper spray is all prohibited and punishable by the criminal code. You got no right to defend yourself in a Democratic/Liberal society.
 

Jazzman1218

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2021
1,053
2,709
113
78
Under the Liberal plan, they want to defund the police and remove mandatory sentencing like Justin Trudeau did. Something is totally off here. Plus you want to put your faith in police? Someone breaks into your home, do you want to hide like a mouse or have the ability to defend yourself? How many more examples do you need? Uvalde? The Vaughan shooter? The shooter at Wal-Mart? The problem is people wait for the police like the Liberals say to do but in the that time it takes them to come the damage is done as we have seen. To the Liberals ideology is more important then practical solutions. The Liberals make it easier for criminals to commit crime. Your logic is also weird, the US has about 286 million registered vehicles in the US, the NHTSA estimates that about 9,560 people died in a car accident in the US in 2022. With Liberal logic all cars should be banned? Society can still be civilized with the right to bear arms. In Canada even non-lethal methods of defense is prohibited, brass knuckels, bear spray, pepper spray is all prohibited and punishable by the criminal code. You got no right to defend yourself in a Democratic/Liberal society.
The vast majority of liberals are not in favor of defunding the police or taking away your precious guns. Liberals, like most Americans, want police accountability and sensible gun safety laws. There are approximately 400 million guns in America and, once again, over 600 mass shootings this year. Studies show gun ownership correlates with more shootings, not less. Also, states with weaker gun safety laws have higher rates of gun related homicides.
 
Last edited:

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
8,480
6,388
113
The vast majority of liberals are not in favor of defunding the police or taking away your precious guns. Liberals, like most Americans, want police accountability and sensible gun safety laws. There are approximately 400 million guns in America and, once again, over 600 mass shootings this year. Studies show gun ownership correlates with more shootings, not less. Also, states with weaker gun safety laws have higher rates of gun related homicides.
Liberals like to distort facts to push their ideology like you just did here. Here are facts. Switzerland has the third most gun ownership in the world after USA and Yemen. Switzerland has about 45.7 guns per 100 residents yet there has not been a mass shooting in 21 years. Fourth place goes to Finland, with 45.3 guns per 100 residents yet it has a very low crime rate.


In Switzerland, people have the right to bear arms under article 3 under the 1997 weapons act. And there has been no mass shooting there since 21 years.


And this info is from a leftist media source. Having said that, I said it before and will say it again there is no direct correlation between guns and higher crimes. Generally the main culprit of crimes is poverty. About the USA, something else is at play and it is not about guns. A gun like an automobile is a tool. Liberal gun laws just prevent law abiding citizens to defend themselves, and also prevent people living in the north (usually Natives) in arctic conditions to be able to hunt for food (there is not much vegetation or grocery stores like in the big cities). The only common sense gun law is the right to bear arms. Every human being has the right to defend themselves, that is a human right. Every human being has the right to hunt for food. There are no ifs or buts.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: purplem

Jazzman1218

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2021
1,053
2,709
113
78
Liberals like to distort facts to push their ideology like you just did here. Here are facts. Switzerland has the third most gun ownership in the world after USA and Yemen. Switzerland has about 45.7 guns per 100 residents yet there has not been a mass shooting in 21 years. Fourth place goes to Finland, with 45.3 guns per 100 residents yet it has a very low crime rate.


In Switzerland, people have the right to bear arms under article 3 under the 1997 weapons act. And there has been no mass shooting there since 21 years.


And this info is from a leftist media source. Having said that, I said it before and will say it again there is no direct correlation between guns and higher crimes. Generally the main culprit of crimes is poverty. About the USA, something else is at play and it is not about guns. A gun like an automobile is a tool. Liberal gun laws just prevent law abiding citizens to defend themselves, and also prevent people living in the north (usually Natives) in arctic conditions to be able to hunt for food (there is not much vegetation or grocery stores like in the big cities). The only common sense gun law is the right to bear arms. Every human being has the right to defend themselves, that is a human right. Every human being has the right to hunt for food. There are no ifs or buts.

Finland has a population of 5.5 million with 1.5 million guns mostly hunting rifles and shotguns. Switzerland has a population of 8.5 million with 2 million guns and the percentage of gun ownership is dropping. The US has a population of 330 million with 400 million guns. Both Finland and Switzerland have historical gun cultures - in Finland because of their hunting culture and in Switzerland because of their history of armed neutrality. Both countries have strict rules for who gets a gun and firearm training is taken seriously
 

Womaniser

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
2,435
3,803
113
Liberals like to distort facts to push their ideology like you just did here. Here are facts. Switzerland has the third most gun ownership in the world after USA and Yemen. Switzerland has about 45.7 guns per 100 residents yet there has not been a mass shooting in 21 years. Fourth place goes to Finland, with 45.3 guns per 100 residents yet it has a very low crime rate.


In Switzerland, people have the right to bear arms under article 3 under the 1997 weapons act. And there has been no mass shooting there since 21 years.


And this info is from a leftist media source. Having said that, I said it before and will say it again there is no direct correlation between guns and higher crimes. Generally the main culprit of crimes is poverty. About the USA, something else is at play and it is not about guns. A gun like an automobile is a tool. Liberal gun laws just prevent law abiding citizens to defend themselves, and also prevent people living in the north (usually Natives) in arctic conditions to be able to hunt for food (there is not much vegetation or grocery stores like in the big cities). The only common sense gun law is the right to bear arms. Every human being has the right to defend themselves, that is a human right. Every human being has the right to hunt for food. There are no ifs or buts.

In those countries, are citizens allowed to posses assault weapons and high capacity magazines ?
 

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
8,480
6,388
113
In those countries, are citizens allowed to posses assault weapons and high capacity magazines ?
In Switzerland, it requires a special permit to own automatic firearms. But that is aside from the point. The Liberals want to ban all firearms and any other weapons (knives, pepper spray, brass knuckles).
 
  • Haha
Reactions: purplem

Womaniser

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
2,435
3,803
113

"Unlike the US, Switzerland has mandatory military service for men. The government gives all men between the ages of 18 and 34 deemed "fit for service" a pistol or a rifle and training on how to use them. After they've finished their service, the men can typically buy and keep their service weapons, but they have to get a permit for them." most do.

In USA, a 6 yers old boy can save his life with a handgun when disciplined by his teacher !