who's "them"?But speaking of tests shouldn't the agencies require them to make things smoother for everyone?
But speaking of tests shouldn't the agencies require them to make things smoother for everyone?
Call me crazy, but if I were a sex worker and my income could be seriously disrupted if I contracted a STI, staph, or mrsa infection, I doubt I'd be interested in interacting sexually with a dude with open rashes, random skin conditions, and so on. Easy for you to write off the risk of your condition(s) on behalf of someone else.I honestly didn't think someone would treat me like complete shit because of some rashes, agioma and mild acne scaring I had, so I was wondering if people did that and if it made any difference.
Once again, it doesn't mean anything, and it's not common practice to do that. No matter how often you get tested, you can still contract an STI. Unless the worker is extremely low volume..An SW sent me her negative test results. Just saying.
I didn't have any open sore unless you're saying that a tiny dot scab is an open sore.Call me crazy, but if I were a sex worker and my income could be seriously disrupted if I contracted a STI, staph, or mrsa infection, I doubt I'd be interested in interacting sexually with a dude with open rashes, random skin conditions, and so on. Easy for you to write off the risk of your condition(s) on behalf of someone else.
And a piece of paper that is at best a snapshot in time, and might not even be accurate the day of depending on timing, wouldn't exactly fill me with confidence either. Especially if you have a nasty skin condition that isn't an STI.
Just get your conditions cleared up before putting others at risk for whatever you might have, pretty simple.
Yeah, I think I need to go less often. I guess I'll go once or twice a year from now on instead of a dozen of times and just mention I got tested at the beginning and how many women I saw.Once again, it doesn't mean anything, and it's not common practice to do that. No matter how often you get tested, you can still contract an STI. Unless the worker is extremely low volume..
Speaking of agencies, I have heard of girls being pressured to keep working even if they have chlamydia or gonorrhea. I don't know how true that is. But they will not require tests anytime soon, for either clients or providers.
Did you send yours?An SW sent me her negative test results. Just saying.
They should maybe create a two-tiered system where we can pay $500 for 1 hour and force people to give a test result from a month ago at the very latest. It would make booking much easier for me because some women get fully booked in a few hours.In the USA if you book a pornstar from the big agencies like PC they may require a "talent testing test", the same the pornstars do wich is done in specific places and are valid 2 weeks. Otherwise some services like BBBJ may not be available.
In Quebec tough i never seen this.
Yeah, I think I need to go less often. I guess I'll go once or twice a year from now on instead of a dozen of times and just mention I got tested at the beginning and how many women I saw.
Fungus infection, impetigo, shingles are all contagious skin problems and are not screened in a STI test. Trying to prove to everyone you have "nothing contagious" with your STI results is useless, they're not the only things that could make us miss many days or weeks of work. You are too focused on STIs. Get tested often and have peace of mind, the rest is not up to you.They should maybe create a two-tiered system where we can pay $500 for 1 hour and force people to give a test result from a month ago at the very latest. It would make booking much easier for me because some women get fully booked in a few hours.
You are just all over the place man. A month old STI test is basically worthless, you could have spent the last 30 days having the highest risk sex possible and sharing IV drug needles with high risk populations for all anyone knows. Whether some girls are difficult to book has nothing to do with your current issues, it's pure supply/demand. If the agencies wanted to test out price equilibrium for super popular girls. they could just bump her rates without adding useless requirements for clients.They should maybe create a two-tiered system where we can pay $500 for 1 hour and force people to give a test result from a month ago at the very latest. It would make booking much easier for me because some women get fully booked in a few hours.
Is there a way to get tested for those as well?Fungus infection, impetigo, shingles are all contagious skin problems and are not screened in a STI test. Trying to prove to everyone you have "nothing contagious" with your STI results is useless, they're not the only things that could make us miss many days or weeks of work. You are too focused on STIs. Get tested often and have peace of mind, the rest is not up to you.
BBBJ? I don't think I want to get bareback full service, don't think I will ever ask that since it seems to be highly unreasonable unless you are willing to pay $10,000.You're missing my point here. I think clients who see providers should absolutely get tested as often as they can. All I'm saying is that a recent test does not prove that you don't have an STI, and a provider may be thrown off by you offering negative test results because she may assume you want bareback. If I were you I'd just take care of the health issue you're dealing with or like I said tell the provider and see if she's comfortable seeing you or not. Like Giselle said, most of us are not trained to tell the difference between STI symptoms or other skin problems.
And if you got tested a month ago, doesn't mean you are ''clean'' now. A lot of people in the industry downplay STI's.. I think it's good to practice harm reduction and yes a test from a few weeks ago is better than none, but it still doesn't prove anything.




