Ask us anything part 3

[MCTJ]

I think I am more offended by what you are saying here than the men on this board, and what you are implying here.

I am sorry that you are offended. I came in with a provocative question, but Luna offered interesting personal insights than led me to refine my thoughts and to integrate psychological aspects as well. Contrary to the woke crowd that dominate universities in social science and pseudo-science, I am open to changing my mind based on information or opinions that are presented to me.

 

[Zero_Six]

It's about what adventure you're looking for.

Exactly. I had a friend that was never single for more than a week at a time in his life. Even he saw a few escorts. Not because he couldn't get laid otherwise but because he chose to. Maybe he had a certain kink, maybe he wanted to experience hiring an SP, maybe because he just didn't want to deal with all the games that are often associated with dating or even just hooking up. Everyone has their own reason for seeing an SP.

 

[Zero_Six]

woke crowd

Nevermind. I thought this was an actual discussion.

 

[Rebaynia]

Although I did not state it clearly, it was indeed my hypothesis (not my theory). You convinced me that among clients at large, there is probably no difference in average attractiveness vs the whole population. This led me to refine my hypothesis that, with respect to regular clients, they must different significantly both physically and psychologically from the general population. I will try to see this weekend if I can find some studies that support (or not) this hypothesis.

Why are you trying to support negative hypothesis of clients who request time with escorts? You are being rather insulting in your assumptions about who would contact us for company.

Again, it is all people's, from all walks of life, with any 1 of a million different reasons.

Let's confuse you even more.... Not every single one of them even wants sex as a result of that time.

 

[Lunaseraphim]

Hey fun fact, did you guys know that the word ''woke'' originally meant, and still mostly means, ''anti racist'' and pro human rights? It's AAVE and originates from the 1930's, when the United States was heavily segregated. A couple decades after slavery was abolished. Just saying.

 

[MCTJ]

Nevermind. I thought this was an actual discussion.

Did you read the words that surround the words "woke crowd" in my sentence? Because if there are dogmatic and anti-scientific people in universities, it is definitely the woke crowd. They have proven it over and over again in the past 12 years, and their time in the spotlight is over. I have shown the opposite mindset in my brief interactions here this evening, as my posts can attest.

 

[Rebaynia]

I am sorry that you are offended. I came in with a provocative question, but Luna offered interesting personal insights than led me to refine my thoughts and to integrate psychological aspects as well. Contrary to the woke crowd that dominate universities in social science and pseudo-science, I am open to changing my mind based on information or opinions that are presented to me.

I read your origional question, and thought it so insulting to clients it didn't warrant an answer, but as I kept reading, you showed just how distasteful your origional question was ment to be.

 

[MCTJ]

Hey fun fact, did you guys know that the word ''woke'' originally meant, and still mostly means, ''anti racist'' and pro human rights? It's AAVE and originates from the 1930's, when the United States was heavily segregated. A couple decades after slavery was abolished. Just saying.

Originally yes, but it has come to define something larger, which is a belief that all differences in outcomes between identifiable groups (based on race, gender, sexual orientation or ability) and the general population must be due to racism, sexism or ableism. Decades of psychological research has proven that this is not the case.

 

[MCTJ]

I read your origional question, and thought it so insulting to clients it didn't warrant an answer, but as I kept reading, you showed just how distasteful your origional question was ment to be.

Then feel free to ignore my posts.

 

[Lunaseraphim]

Originally yes, but it has come to define something larger, which is a belief that all differences in outcomes between identifiable groups (based on race, gender, sexual orientation or ability) must be due to racism, sexism or ableism. Decades of psychological research has proven that this is not the case.

I don't really know what any of this has to do with our answers to your question.. or at least not mine. I agree that a lot of these so called woke people in universities are out of touch with reality and lack nuance, but isn't saying that regular clients of escorts are mostly ugly and have no friends also without nuance? idk

 

[Zero_Six]

Did you read the words that surround the words "woke crowd" in my sentence? Because if there are dogmatic and anti-scientific people in universities, it is definitely the woke crowd. They have proven it over and over again in the past 12 years, and their time in the spotlight is over. I have shown the opposite mindset in my brief interactions here this evening, as my posts can attest.

If you want anyone that isn't far-right to take you seriously, don't use the term woke. It's original meaning was "aware of the racism and inequality in our society". The far-right has co-opted it for themselves to basically mean "Anything I don't like but can't go into detail about because that would make it apparent that I'm racist/bigoted/a shitty human being".

I'm not even really sure what you mean when you say "if there are dogmatic and anti-scientific people in universities, it is definitely the woke crowd". Just adding the word woke might work for the far-right, but I prefer an actual explanation of what you mean. With the way the word is thrown around these days I might think you just mean non-white people or gay people. It's such a vague term that I have no idea what you actually mean.

Also - "dogmatic and anti-scientific". Are you sure you didn't to the bible thumpers? They're the ones that tend to get in the way of progress and they certainly aren't "woke".

 

[MCTJ]

but I prefer an actual explanation of what you mean.

See Post # 2,906. The trick with them is that they make everything (on purpose!) hard to define! To find them in universities, look for departments that end in "studies".

We've strayed far from the original question and of the purpose of this thread, so I'll go read a book. Good night!

 

[Zero_Six]

See Post # 2,906. The trick with them is that they make everything (on purpose!) hard to define! To find them in universities, look for departments that end in "studies".

We've strayed far from the original question and of the purpose of this thread, so I'll go read a book. Good night!

Cool, so no clarification about what you meant. Still don't know what aspect of this "woke crowd" it is that you consider to be the problem. I guess that's kind of the point though. Like you said...

"The trick with them is that they make everything (on purpose!) hard to define". Why bother going into details and expressing yourself properly when you can just say woke and have the people that already agree with you give the thumbs up.

 

[LeDodo]

I am sorry that you are offended. I came in with a provocative question, but Luna offered interesting personal insights than led me to refine my thoughts and to integrate psychological aspects as well. Contrary to the woke crowd that dominate universities in social science and pseudo-science, I am open to changing my mind based on information or opinions that are presented to me.

I think your hypothesises are based on societal codes and stereotypes which is already orienting the "answers". Fortunately the sex industry is a safer "society" or safe space where your desires, thoughts are less prone to those judgements. And that's maybe why client base comes from a wide variety of walk of life.
That's also maybe a cue explaining that not only "ugly" clients are paying for SP's services. Obviously one good point @Lunaseraphim mentioned is about the affordability. You might have clients who are paying and/or savingfor special occasions. But for most of us it's because we can afford this luxury.

Actually reading the comments on this topic made me think and create the thread regarding the Chinese scandal about sister Hong here.
In short the scandal is about a man disguising as a woman and recording their encounters. Honestly looking at the "disguise" I can't imagine anyone really thinking she is a lady ...

 

[Rebaynia]

Cool, so no clarification about what you meant. Still don't know what aspect of this "woke crowd" it is that you consider to be the problem. I guess that's kind of the point though. Like you said...

"The trick with them is that they make everything (on purpose!) hard to define". Why bother going into details and expressing yourself properly when you can just say woke and have the people that already agree with you give the thumbs up.

Save it, we don't want the thread getting blocked.

He just got his definition out of the same encyclopedia that boasts the earth is flat. While talking about woke not believing in sciences...

Anyways, this felt more like someone looking for points to add to why SW should be something to be ashamed of useing. It is a valuable service to those who enjoy it, for whatever their reason to seek it out.

 

[Lunaseraphim]

I feel like a big issue here is that people use buzz words like "woke" or "pick me" or "white knight" to shut others down instead of trying to see the other's perspective and having respectful conversations. It's also because we're online and we don't have the other person/people in front of us.

I also think Merb is somewhat "safe" in the sense that normally no one disturbs the status quo, which is why I'm going to go back to reading books, listening to music, drawing, watching movies, talking to my friends and being pretty

 

[Rebaynia]

I would not wish to be talked about in this way, and I wouldn't want those I see to be disrespected either.
contrary to what point was being made, I would say I have been fortunate enough to enjoy time in this, with some men I wouldn't have even attempted to catch eyes with in public, and some quality blessings I might not have given them the time they deserved.

So, question.

For the gents,
We are in a field that your attraction to us is important, not ours to you.

What catches your eye first to book? Legs, waist, breast, butt, lingerie... ect.
And do you book primarily on looks? (Like those who see a picture, number, and don't read anything further) Or does the bio/ad play much importance?

 

[LeDodo]

For the gents,
We are in a field that your attraction to us is important, not ours to you.

What catches your eye first to book? Legs, waist, breast, butt, lingerie... ect.
And do you book primarily on looks? (Like those who see a picture, number, and don't read anything further) Or does the bio/ad play much importance?

Some answers from this post to your question: The first part of the body you are looking first
For it's a bit special as it's the hands ... Lol

Otherwise for booking the bio/as play play a big importance but to be honest you need to meet the SP to confirm it as usually it's well written but in reality it can be just on paper.

 

[Michelle Gunn]

This will do nothing in answering my original question, but I will make a poll asking merb clients to self-rate their physical attractiveness, once my current poll on friendship ends. Should be interesting.

I'm glad that Luna and Rebaynia were here to do all of the heavy lifting on this topic (per usual), but if I've learned anything by being an SP, it's that you are your own worst critic as much as I am mine.
I had an argument relatively recently with a man who, when he opened the door to greet me my first thoughts were literally "wooooh, I'm so lucky, this guy is fucking hot". He then tried to explain to me how unattractive he is, because of this thing or the other that were imperfect in his eyes... anyway, if you're reading this, you're still wrong and I'm still right (obviously).

 

[Enjoying life]

Exactly. I had a friend that was never single for more than a week at a time in his life. Even he saw a few escorts. Not because he couldn't get laid otherwise but because he chose to. Maybe he had a certain kink, maybe he wanted to experience hiring an SP, maybe because he just didn't want to deal with all the games that are often associated with dating or even just hooking up. Everyone has their own reason for seeing an SP.

I see a lot of unappealing looking guys with wives and kids as they probably have money