The U.S. coronavirus-related deaths surpassed 700,000, the most in any country, according to a Reuters tally. Globally, the pandemic is set to surpass 5 million deaths.
They died, but imagine the families, friends, and all the collateral damage.
You still don’t get it… They do them, I do me, you do you and that’s it. Everybody doesn’t need to be obsesse by COVID-19 and public health like you judge it’s ok to be. People come, people go it’s called natural selection and life goes on.Idaho Coronavirus Vaccination Progress
How is Idaho progressing in its mission to vaccinate the population? See how many people are fully vaccinated state-wide and parse the numbers by demographics.usafacts.org
In Idaho, 842 333 people or 47% of the state has received at least one dose.
Overall, 745 039 people or 41% of Idaho's population has been fully vaccinated.
Only 41%
CNN strategically left out China??!!???!!!Tracking Covid-19’s global spread
Since December 2019, the disease has spread to every continent and case numbers continue to risewww.cnn.com
Poor you, everyone knows that China is the country that controls everything, and even more the number of deaths from covid.CNN strategically left out China??!!???!!!
Now Now Since it "Originated" in China it should be at the top of list.
Here..John Hopkins medical Since 2019:
China: 108736 cases 4849 deaths.
If these were Hockey scores China would be a blowout win!
Us suckers are losing the game. China must be cheating.
Past month:
1412 cases 1 (ONE) new death.
China must run CNN. Or give 'em orders.
Even if I agree we can not trust numbers from China, it is also true that when the Chinese government say "Stay Home" the people stay home, preventing the contagion. We also saw that at the beginning of the pandemic people with any symptoms were taken, by force when needed, out of their house and kept in special area for a forced quarantine. Of course, it's all anti-democratic but it was 100% efficient to control the contagion. Would I like those methods having been implemented here? Of course, NO... But, I have no sympathy for "the illuminated" still protesting here that their freedom is under attack. I would send them for a week in China to see what is a real attack on freedom.Poor you, everyone knows that China is the country that controls everything, and even more the number of deaths from covid.
Protesting is not a crime and hurting your feeling either. Maybe you should consider move to Australia, I bet their politics suit you well.Passeport vaccinal: des manifestants veulent encore bloquer des ponts
Les autorités policières surveillent de près des manifestants qui comptent bloquer des ponts à la grandeur de la province la semaine prochaine....www.qub.ca
These people are against all around coronavirus.
“We are aware of this demonstration. We will definitely be present in the various places to see if criminal offenses will be committed, ”Ann Mathieu, spokesperson for the Sûreté du Québec (SQ), told the Journal.
Hundreds of people have already confirmed on Facebook their participation in the event on October 15 called "Blocking truckers, cars, roads, bridges Quebec and Montreal".
In Montreal, the Jacques-Cartier and Samuel-De Champlain bridges are targeted by protesters. In the Capitale-Nationale, it's the Québec and Pierre-Laporte bridges that risk being blocked by the crowd.
A 22-year old anti-vaccine man is the organizer.
Because of a few hundred illuminated, thousands of people are going to have problems.
Could we jail them all together.
I stop reading at probably, you lost all credibility after that word.Protesting is against the law when it hurts others freedom to go working. Protesting, by walking in the streets or sitting in a park is OK. Anyway, you will get your 2 minutes on TVA with your "LIBARTÉ" signs.
The moment you start intentionally obstructing other people from going about their day, you’re probably entering the realm of behaviour that is considered criminal by the Government of Canada. The Criminal Code of Canada has a couple of rather broadly written sections that cover this. Section 423, for instance, makes it an indictable offence to compel “another person to abstain from doing anything that he or she has a lawful right to do, or to do anything that he or she has a lawful right to abstain from doing.”
source: https://www.capitaldaily.ca/news/protest-legality
Unfortunately it's exactly the opposite.I stop reading at probably, you lost all credibility after that word.