Here is video of the hit:
So if you are Scheifele, how do you argue this one? I think there are only 3 things he can argue:
1. Checking Evans viciously was the only way to dislodge the puck and stop the empty net goal, even though he got to Evans a split second too late and did not stop the empty net goal
2. No prior disciplinary record
3. If he had stopped Evans from scoring, it would be viewed as a heroic, goal saving check, and Jets are still in the game and might win it.
One thing you learn doing the work that I do, which is sometimes defending the indefensible, is that you NEVER raise a white flag, even when you know you are going down. The above would be my advice to Scheifele as his counsel in the hearing, although I do not believe he will get one.
He will likely be suspended 2-7 games.
1. Checking Evans viciously was the only way to dislodge the puck and stop the empty net goal, even though he got to Evans a split second too late and did not stop the empty net goal
2. No prior disciplinary record
3. If he had stopped Evans from scoring, it would be viewed as a heroic, goal saving check, and Jets are still in the game and might win it.
One thing you learn doing the work that I do, which is sometimes defending the indefensible, is that you NEVER raise a white flag, even when you know you are going down. The above would be my advice to Scheifele as his counsel in the hearing, although I do not believe he will get one.
He will likely be suspended 2-7 games.