Good article? You meant to say "great article". Thanks!
Well Doc, I wouldn't say it's a
great article, mainly because he comes to the wrong conclusion when he makes the mistake of thinking the Leafs will be good next season, when most intelligent hockey people realize the Leafs are still crap.
I must give him credit for quite a few excellent observations however. To save people the trouble of reading the entire misguided article, I will quote the key points:
"The Leafs have not made the playoffs in five seasons. They've never had a playoff series post-lockout. Even the damn Phoenix Coyotes have seen the playoffs, and they're in the middle of the damn desert!" (By the way, contrast this history of constant ineptitude to the magnificent record of the great Detroit Red Wings, who have made the playoffs for an astounding 19!!! consecutive seasons!)
"Phil Kessel's fat face is 23 years old." Kessel is a "Philip Seymour Hoffman look-a-like".
Phaneuf "looks like he's pushing 40". "Maybe it's his cro-magnan brow."
Gunnarsson is "23 and has never known the touch of a woman."
So, there ARE several valid and excellent observations, which I have quoted. Unfortunately, the rest of the article lacks the quality of these quotes.