It's about to get even lower. The case is getting attention. The interview on youtube and LaPresse article is gettimg insane attention.And amazingly, only 10% or less who contact me get to make it to a booking. It's not 10% who cause issues, sorry.
It's about to get even lower. The case is getting attention. The interview on youtube and LaPresse article is gettimg insane attention.And amazingly, only 10% or less who contact me get to make it to a booking. It's not 10% who cause issues, sorry.
I swear they aren't deleting the texts. I don't do this activity often but agencies' responses tell me they have my old texts from months prior. I can bet this can be easily tested.
The Canadian law requires only that you "communicated for the purpose" of paying for sex. You don't actually need to do it.
We're all in a lot of trouble then!
It's about to get even lower. The case is getting attention. The interview on youtube and LaPresse article is gettimg insane attention.
For some reason I have a feeling more agencies are about to get raidedNot only that, but in the case of one agency, they have your contact info from a previous agency from which it was an offshoot - I know this because the SP at the newer agency called me by the (fake) name I gave XO back a long time ago. Never gave it to the newer one.
No you didn’t. But do you think an ayatollah is going to knock on your door to take you to the town square for your execution?We're all in a lot of trouble then!
That brings to mind the subject of burner phones. I've always bought a new SIM when I get into town, and I registered under a fake name ... but I bought the SIM with a credit card, and used it with my standard phone, so I didn't really get myself any extra protection, did I?
Only if Canada is as totalitarian as many Americans believe. My guess is the country isn’t, you’re implying it is.For some reason I have a feeling more agencies are about to get raided
I think you guys are just fucking with us at this point. Lol.So if we used our phone to text XO even if we didn’t get an appointment we are cocked?
What about doing business with other agencies and they get raided and their phones seized?
The shit is about to hit the fan…
Why do you think they are not going after clients since their is a law against client but not law against the sp, so to stop this shit they are juste gonna put end on the demande to stop this scandale…No you didn’t. But do you think an ayatollah is going to knock on your door to take you to the town square for your execution?
Again, nobody gives a shit about any clients.
Yep as per Bill C-36. All they need are the texts. Even asking for a booking makes you guilty of solicitation for sexual services. Whether they will go after the clients or not is another story. But they can if they want to. The law is very broad and it was designed in this way on purpose.So if we used our phone to text XO even if we didn’t get an appointment we are cocked?
What about doing business with other agencies and they get raided and their phones seized?
The shit is about to hit the fan…
The communication says that you asked for sex services even if you didn't get the appointment, they yeah you are cookedSo if we used our phone to text XO even if we didn’t get an appointment we are cocked?
What about doing business with other agencies and they get raided and their phones seized?
The shit is about to hit the fan…
Do you think they gain from stopping sex work?Why do you think they are not going after clients since their is a law against client but not law against the sp, so to stop this shit they are juste gonna put end on the demande to stop this scandale…
Because nobody cares about the clients.Why do you think they are not going after clients since their is a law against client but not law against the sp, so to stop this shit they are juste gonna put end on the demande to stop this scandale…
Also please find statistics about such prosecutions since the law has been enacted.Why do you think they are not going after clients since their is a law against client but not law against the sp, so to stop this shit they are juste gonna put end on the demande to stop this scandale…
At this point we should begin to tell people to move out of Canada, change name and sex JUST to be sure.The question pops-up every day, multiple times a day, And I suspect it is the reason, this thread is 46 pages long now.
People secretly looking if they're in trouble or not.
Why do you think they are not going after clients since their is a law against client but not law against the sp, so to stop this shit they are juste gonna put end on the demande to stop this scandale…
Why does LE want clients to stop seeing escorts? Like, why now, unless I missed an announcement? And that would mean Independents would be at risk nearly as much as agencies, as LE could watch clients entering even a residence.Don’t you think this is exactly what LE wants, make clients panic so they stop seeing escorts? The point of C-36 is to stop the demand, not the offer. They did a good job.





