Simple Question: In General, do you think the ratings given to Montreal Escorts by reviewers on MERB are accurate?
BTW: Public Poll. Yup, people will know your opinion. So step up to the plate guys!!......those of you that have the guts....
Hello CS,
When temperatures are higher opinions are too. It probably doesn't matter if it's one writes right after a meeting or later when recalling as one writes. The thermometer will rise and so will the opinion. But, even the distortions, negative or positive, have some sort of relative scale that is helpful.
Cheers,
Merlot
I'm in total agreement on the mid-range. On a 1-10 scale, anything above a 5 is over average. I've met any number of 8s and maybe a couple of 9s in my days here. There are, however, far too many reviewers whose scale begins at 8.Personally, I consider myself very conservative when rating looks. For a girl to be scaled at an 8 or 9 to me she really has to be something incredible. The majority of gals I meet are in the 5 - 6.95 range, which in reality isn't a bad thing at all but it's just one persons opinion. I'm trying to think of an example of an 8+ that I have met in Montreal and will get back when I do.
Now what could be a potential break out the popcorn thread...
Hello CS,
Interesting poll. Well worded question and good subject. I think as humans we all tend to put out "slant" on things when we convey as story. Much more I could add...but I am in a rush today. Results are interesting so far...
One curious question for everyone...its easy to see how this applies to positive reviews...but what about the negative ones? Do you guys feel they are somewhat exaggerated also?
Have fun,
Jman
For those that like full figured ladies Samy is a great choice, certainly way up there in the montreal sp scene, i don't think to many people are going to be disappointed when they open the door
Sometimes people take a "full figured" reference as something uncomplimentary. Samantha is a curvaceous fantasy goddess. The story about how she stopped traffic and mesmerized the drivers as she passed after the GT last year says it all.
Looking at those who've voted, most are frequent posters. So we're still not having most lurkers even voting....
Is this a 2nd carreer CS ?
I mean 2 polls (back a back comme disent les flots) back to back ?
The conclusion on this one's easy... probably is why you don't have more vote... the majority must agree with the :
Somewhat....
I think that is why they are called lurkers, they don't post or vote in public polls, although you do get the odd pm from them requesting information.