Montreal Escorts

Threats, insults and intimidation directed at MERB from MERC. How do we stop it?

Status
Not open for further replies.

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,559
28
48
49
Where I belong.
What you say is true, Robin. Unfortunately, merc has long since ceased to be a review board.
 

CS Martin

Banned
Apr 21, 2007
1,097
0
0
i would like to know from merb mods has fredzed ever interferred with any decisions that you have taken or tried to direct your decisions in any way for merb's advertisers interests

as per usual merc’s band of buddies led in this case by the ever present moron Ziggy, first thought I was rumples and now he thinks that i’m sl. well i’ve got news for you my dear tool of dissections, I am neither one of the two fucking delusional dreamers.

this illustrates exactly how merc permits its posters to run amuk and make whatever statements, allegations or claims about individuals or businesses and never having to produce one scintilla of proof.

MS, allow me to return your greeting of last night with a cheery "Shut the f__k up" :D (Sorry Mod 8, but I couldn't let MS think he'd shut me up. Score settled now). As to the principal of your thoughts....I admit to being one of the most skeptical of posters in this regard and I've SEEN NO TRACES OF THIS TYPE OF INFLUENCE on this board in two years. While the Moderators and I have had our disagreements, FredZed seems to have left them completely alone. Given the tone of this board, I think they've done a credible job recently (Yes, even Mod 11 who refers to me as an Idiot).

We have two different types of operations here. MERB is more of a cross platform component rather than a sole tool for SEO placement. I may not be phrasing it correctly, but in more plain terms MERB is part of the MERB/TERB/PERB...etc..etc.. larger advertising platform. FredZed seems to allow each of the components to take their own shape. Merc on the other hand seems to exist to leverage Tom's "escort affiliations". The two, from a business perspective, seem to have similar aims with different goals.
 

Man Spors

New Member
Nov 8, 2010
34
0
0
Score settled now
We have two different types of operations here. MERB is more of a cross platform component rather than a sole tool for SEO placement. I may not be phrasing it correctly, but in more plain terms MERB is part of the MERB/TERB/PERB...etc..etc.. larger advertising platform. FredZed seems to allow each of the components to take their own shape. Merc on the other hand seems to exist to leverage Tom's "escort affiliations". The two, from a business perspective, seem to have similar aims with different goals.

score noted but i wasn't aware of any competition.

i'll reserve my own thoughts regarding the influences or interferences that fredzed puts on merb's moderators for myself based on what any of them answers or if they answer and how open they are in their answers. substance is everything.
 

Man Spors

New Member
Nov 8, 2010
34
0
0
according to the ziggmeister the moron, he thinks that we all need to get laid.

this coming from a man whose wife couldn't care less that he spends all of his free time the hell away from her and on a sex board
 

Merlot

Banned
Nov 13, 2008
4,111
0
0
Visiting Planet Earth
Hello all,

Robin you right on. It's really quite simple. The green board has......

Gee it's amusing to see Tom go into his Tony clone persona as "The Wickerman" and pretend he isn't totally exposed as Tom.


It's no secret that Tony & Ziggy have made many enemies on Montreal boards but I am surprised to see so many long-timers going after Tom. Opposition to the terrible two seems to be only a cover to strike at Tom for some other slight.

I can't speak for anyone else but myself Robin, but I would guess you are universally respected here by all senior members who have known you through your posts and reviews. Still I am surprised. You probably know the inner workings of blueland as well as anyone. What are the "terrible two" without the master who provides all of the opportunity, including bringing both of them back from exile he imposed himself to degrade that board. You were inside the committee efforts. You have seen how blueland devolved often against the advice of it's mods. And who directed it all into what it is today. TOM/The Wickerman/The Wicked Man/etc.

As far back as I can remember (from the days of Canbest, Lyla and GS) fueding, insulting and name-calling between cliques have been the bane of what were supposed to be review boards for friendly exchange of information. Different moderators have different views on where to draw the line between heated arguments and vicious attacks, and my views differ from many of them. Applying peer pressure by participating in such threads is probably the best way to squelch the troublemaking.

I can't support any group that aims to reduce the board choices for hobbyists or advertising choices for SP's. We need more of these, not less.

Then your solution of "participating" would require all bans for all of those who were only banned for essentially having an opposing point of view/philosophy from the current ilk, and labeled "troublemakers", to be allowed back to apply the peer pressure you cite as the solution. Inevitably, this goes back to why I am perplexed that you don't understand why Tom is the problem. Tom eliminated the peer pressure you propose by eliminating all opposition to his bile-mongering creatures, and thus eliminated your solution. Just read Tom/The Wickerman's posts right after yours in blueland and see what chance your solution has. NONE! Even you can do nothing to sway Tom...and thus the reason he is the target.

Respects,

Merlot
 
Last edited:

Mod 11

Active Member
Jul 28, 2009
3,427
1
38
15
i would like to know from merb mods has fredzed ever interferred with any decisions that you have taken or tried to direct your decisions in any way for merb's advertisers interests.
Never happened as far as I know. Fred know we live the daily events of the board so, he trust we know what to do.

If Fred have a question or is asked by an advertiser to justify one of our decisions, Fred have no problem asking us and relaying the info to the advertiser. He act as an interface and trust he doesn't need to intervene further, even if he could. He is the boss and have our respect and he equally respect our judgment.
 

Mod 8

New Member
Jun 7, 2007
3,716
2
0
17
i would like to know from merb mods has fredzed ever interferred with any decisions that you have taken or tried to direct your decisions in any way for merb's advertisers interests

Hello everyone,

For the poster who asked the question and others who wish to know, and although this question has been answered a number of times on MERB in the past, I will attempt to answer it again. Fred Zed has nothing to do with the day to day function or moderating of MERB. He does not interfere in moderator decisions and moderators are free to use our own judgment when moderating the board. We are not influenced by any outside source in our decisions. Each moderator makes decisions on his own and we do not wait for any group discussion before making a decision. There have been situations where we have consulted each other on a course of action but the moderator making the decision is not bound by any group vote.

Fred has come to us on occasion with questions regarding particular situations in the past but has never over-ruled any moderator decision as far as I am aware. He also has moderator powers of course but it is extremely rare that he ever uses that ability. I cannot actually remember any situation where Fred has banned a member or acted as a moderator in any way. His primary involvement in MERB is handling advertising payments, setting advertising policy and approving new members. Even the selection of new moderators is made by the existing mods, Fred simply sets up the new moderator account when requested.

Fred has always expressed complete confidence in the moderation staff of MERB and we do our best to deserve that confidence by moderating fairly across the board.

The only failure we have had is in getting more smilies for MERB. But we have not given up on that yet!

Mod 8
 

Jman47

Red Sox Nation
Jan 28, 2009
1,296
0
0
Hello everyone,

The only failure we have had is in getting more smilies for MERB. But we have not given up on that yet!

Mod 8

Hello Mod 8,

Well don't give up the quest my good man...I still have faith in you!!!
<insert cool winking smiley here>

Have fun,

Jman
 

The Führer

New Member
Jun 17, 2010
15
0
0
Downtown
Merc vs Merb ce n'est même pas fair to compare the two

Merc se cherche de capital de sympathie c'est tout, de plus
Merc est un organisme régional déservant le grand Montréal
point à la ligne.

Merb fait parti d'une organisation national qui est beaucoup plus
prestigieuse et sérieuse beaucoup plus en vue du publique, donc
plus de traffic .

De plus je crois sérieusement que Tom n'est plus le proprio de merc,
il est tout de même pas si imbécille que cela .
I seriously beleive that Tom is no longer the owner of Merc. Why would
he behave like this , he's not that stupid.
 

Dee

Banned
Mar 26, 2004
908
2
0
Visit site
Heather: Dee, I've been trying to understand what this boycott stuff is all about. Can you help me?


D.: I'll do my best. Put your clothes back on and we'll start.
I think it should really be called a “girlcott”.


Heather: could you, just for once in your life, try to be serious?


D.: sure. Why not? Why did the chicken... Just kidding, go-ahead Heather.


Heather: what is it all about?


D.: I'm not really sure myself but as best as I can understand, some users of the green board are upset at users of the blue board and in an attempt to cause the owner of the blue board (not the originators of the comments) financial problems they want to boycott the ladies who advertise on the blue board, to force them to stop advertising there.


Heather: But why hurt the girls?


D.: To protect them.


Heather: Huh?


D.: Precisely.


Heather: Is it proposed that the ladies and agencies who advertise on the blue board be boycotted even if they advertise on the green board as well?


D.: yes.


Heather: that doesn't make sense. Surely the green mods are furious at this.


D.: nope.


Heather: but if the boycotted girls start to lose money and dates isn't there a danger that they will be forced into riskier conduct to make a living.

D.:I'm not sure, but this has long been the theory of certain members.


Heather: I don't understand one member's fervent desire to boycott and yet he will still be seeing the girls who should be subject to the boycott. That doesn't make sense


D.: right again. Rumples has attempted to explain this to the member.


Heather: I must not understand something. It appears to me that to protect the girls the boycotters are attempting to hurt the girls' business.


D.: I don't understand either ... I mean I don't understand the reasoning, I may have some inkling of the reasons but I won't speculate. .


Heather: Have the girls asked for this help?


D.: I'm not aware of any of the girls asking for this help. No one has answered this question


Heather: what would the anticombine folks think about this.


D.: I know nothing about that but I will say I personally have nothing against machines used to harvest crops. Without them we might all go hungry.


Heather: stop it! Do you think that the boycott will work?


D.: what do you think – the main instigator has nothing to boycott (it would be like me boycotting health food), his usually loyal friend will continue to see the girls that are to be boycotted whenever he wants to see them. Hardly anyone has “signed on”. Perhaps there will be a big announcement naming all those that will take the pledge so that the effect will be maximized.


Heather: why don't the main proponents of the boycott present their issues on the blue board?


D.: they are banned there – if I remember correctly, they said they wanted to be banned.


Heather: Huh?


D.: exactly.


Heather: what do you think about the deleting of the posts in this thread?


D: it was to be expected. The mods have the right to run the board as they see fit. I might wish that they would leave in any salient points that have been made.


Heather: while you very effectively make excellent points, there is an air of smugness in your posts.


D.: just my style when combating.. well you know... try to lighten things up. Those who know me, know that I am a very humble man.. add your own Churchill quote here.


Heather: what is the one thing that you would least want the world to know about you?


D.: you're pushing it, my dear.


Heather: come on, answer!


D.: I was in favor of Canada joining the United States of America in the invasion of Iraq.


Heather: I hate you.


D.: will you marry me?
 
Last edited:

Dee

Banned
Mar 26, 2004
908
2
0
Visit site
First, allow me to apologize to Sapman99, Mod 8 & Techman for polluting a thread in which they participated in. If there's actually anyone else in the thread I respect and that I've missed, they have my apologies as well.

Next Point, the opinions here are based upon the two following facts and experiences:
1) I was a moderator on the Blue Board and worked closely with their other moderators and Tom. Accordingly, I have much more insight into the inner workings of management than others.
2) During my stint as a moderator on the blue board, Tony invited me, gave his permission, encouraged and provided me the password to monitor his e-mail account. His motivations are still unclear to me as they are to many others. At no time did I or do I have the computer skills to “hack” anyone’s computer or e-mail. But truth is not as much fun as fiction or accusations, is it?

The foregoing were stated to support my opinions and statements as follows:



Great Idea, I truly wish ALL THREADS were enforced in this manner.




Don’t agree with this portion of your posts in more ways than you can imagine or know. The truth in this industry is much more shocking than the readers out there could imagine. But, I can tell you it’s all about results. Tom told me many times he makes little or nothing from MERC and it serves ONLY to support his other enterprises. Yes, Moderators this is from PERSONAL EXPERIENCE and thus is a supportable fact. The value of MERC to advertisers is purely based upon $$$$. If it produces business, well OK. Some Agencies choose not to advertise in that venue, as the type of clientele traffic it produces are not part of their marketing targets. If SD/MSC/BSD/Jessy/Peter/Maria Divina choose to advertise there, it must meet their marketing plan AND TARGETED CLIENTELE. If these businesses have something you want to buy, buy it. If not, don’t. The value of these boards is supposedly in their abilities to allow the consumer to shop.

Quick Side Note: Johnmbot, keep of the outstanding work in the CIM/CIMSW thread. You’re the best dude!! (Mods, I put this side note to highlight what the value of these boards should be and who is doing it)




I very much doubt ANYTHING WILL BE SERIOUSLY FOLLOWED UP ON OR WITH ANY LASTING RESULTS. As a moderator on MERC when Tony was “permanently banned”, I personally witnessed Tom communicating with Tony via BC essentially telling him at the same time the permanant ban on Tony would be lifted shortly. I brought this to the attention of the other moderators who WERE NOT SHOCKED. Putting this together with my witnessing that Tom would regularly reverse the calls of his moderators led me to literally tell Tom “You can take this job and shove it”. Now, lets understand that moderators almost always discussed BC each and every call being made. Tom simply had his own agenda and favorites (posters). So getting rid of Tony?? Not going to happen!! Listen to me, “Not going to happen!!”



Doubt this is going to happen. According to my conversations with Tom, the website is all about hits and the profile it brings to Tom’s other endeavors. The question you need to ask yourself, “Is the deletion of this content going to help his hits and increase viewer time on the website?”

As for myself, I simply have reduced my visits as the content grows more predictable and.....how can I put it? Fucking Boring!!! Sorry Moderators if the "Fucking Boring" opinion is unsupported. Go ahead and ban me for an unsupported opinion.

I've used the ignore facility on this board and use it in theory with regards to MERC more and more. Make sense....

CSM is the maverick's maverick!

Mods: Is there anything here that you feel uncomfortable with as far as disclosure of private info is concerned?
 

CS Martin

Banned
Apr 21, 2007
1,097
0
0
CSM is the maverick's maverick!

Mods: Is there anything here that you feel uncomfortable with as far as disclosure of private info is concerned?

Dee,

Thank you for the compliment. With respect to the private information you mention. Certain parties had made, and continue to make, unsupported allegations about my past dealings in this nasty little community of ours. I was simply being allowed to "tell my side of the story", as certain idiots always believe their less than reliable sources. That being said, there will be some other upcoming disclosures to refute many of the other stories being pasted around about me. While I don't really care what certain folks think about me, I do want to be left alone to post without the constant BS accusations of these morons, who tend to talk rather than think.

Signed,
Glad to be a Maverick's Maverick

P.S. Upcoming, that night at the airport.....the untold story.
 
Last edited:

Mod 8

New Member
Jun 7, 2007
3,716
2
0
17
Hello Dee,

I have a numer of points to address in your post. First of all, the removed posts in this thread had nothing to do with the topic of the thread. They were removed because they were totally off topic and were basically a minor flame war among certain members. If there had been anything pertinent in any of those posts, it would have remained in the thread and the garbage edited out. You will notice that there is a post in this thread that led to the suspension of a member, Man Spor. While the member was suspended for the post, the post remains as it is pertinent to this thread. Any attempts to claim censorship in this thread are made only to sow suspicion and not based on any factual basis.

Second point, CS Martin is not revealing any personal information in his post. Personal information constitutes information that may be used to identify the real identity of a member or their place of residence. There is none of that in his post. If he wishes to post his experiences as a merc moderator in the goal of informing this community of how that board is run, he is free to do so.

Final point, you should take another look at the title of this thread. The main reason I have allowed this thread to go on is so that the MERB community may have a chance to defend themselves against the constant lies, insults and attacks leveled at the members of this board with impunity by certain members of merc. The proposed boycott by the members is in the goal of getting Tom to actually get off his ass and do some proper moderation on his board. I see nothing about providing protection for SPs as this is something that can never be achieved by any message board. It is, however, possible for a board's moderators to prevent constant attacks on SPs who wish to post on a board and allow them to contribute along with any other member with the same rights in regards to personal attacks and insults on the board. All members on MERB are subject to the same rules and regulations in regards to conduct and posting.

I understand that your usual tactic is to attempt to turn a thread in a different direction by going on the attack and trying to discredit the other posters in the thread. That will not work in this thread. The reason this thread exists is to put pressure on Tom to clean up his board. Nothing more, nothing less.

If Tom wishes this to stop, he simply has to remove any and all reference to this board and it's members. If he complies with this, MERB will return to our policy of asking members to refrain from mentioning any other board in their posts. Peaceful co-existence was once the norm between the two boards and that policy was not broken here, it was broken on merc.


Mod 8
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,559
28
48
49
Where I belong.
I'm sorry, Dee, that you don't understand the dynamics of a boycott. I'm surprised as it's really not all that complex.

1. The only power we have to exert is the power of the purse.
2. The agencies and indys are the financial engine of Tom's malevolent empire.
3. The boycott cuts the flow of revenue to Tom.
4. Tom takes the hit or takes action.
5. No girl's revenue will suffer if she removes her advertising from Tom's venues.

How much simpler would you like me to make it?
 

CS Martin

Banned
Apr 21, 2007
1,097
0
0
Here's an opinion many won't like, but what the hell: I think Montreal needs two boards in order to maintain balance. This is my observation and opinion based upon posting since before the existance of most boards. Unlike others, I would rather see multiple boards. Unfortunately, MERC's management simply is not currently up to the task of managing a productive board. It's not about evil or not evil. Boards, like companies, tend to take on the character of the management. When I became a moderator there, I was led to believe Tom would be "hands off". He would leave day to day matters in the hands of others. He seemed unable to divorce himself from fiddling around and do the one thing a good manager must do "delegate".

My observation is Tom is in a bit of a quandry. He would like better and more responsible content, he's just not able to attract & manage it at this time. Do the posters over there have the ability to post better & more responsible content? YUP. Problem is the environment of the Wild Wild West that Tom's either unwilling or unable to get control of. Boycott......sorry, I can hear Tom laughing hard all the way to Florida. I questioned the use of this thread early on and limited my involvement. I just didn't see the point. I now see its neccessity and great benefit.

Now to the point of the thread: Threats, insults and intimidation directed at MERB from MERC. How do we stop it?

Boycott: Seems to me it does very little

This Thread: Helps, but unless it stays on point and continues to deliver the message it will be short lived. Posters & Lurkers will quickly dicern the differences of the boards, but a little rational help will push it along

Content: I again want to point out the outstanding job Johnmbot is doing in updating and managing an excellent thread. Some posters here want to create a perception of themselves rather than writing a factual detailed review. They're more worried about their reputations than helping their fellow clients. In fact, they keep the best secrets to themselves. So to recap they write reviews to manage their reputations and keep the best in their hip pockets. Does that sound like a formula for good content or a productive board?
 
Last edited:

Dee

Banned
Mar 26, 2004
908
2
0
Visit site
I'm sorry, Dee, that you don't understand the dynamics of a boycott. I'm surprised as it's really not all that complex.

1. The only power we have to exert is the power of the purse.
2. The agencies and indys are the financial engine of Tom's malevolent empire.
3. The boycott cuts the flow of revenue to Tom.
4. Tom takes the hit or takes action.
5. No girl's revenue will suffer if she removes her advertising from Tom's venues.

How much simpler would you like me to make it?

Hi Rumples,

I'll take your comment "How much simpler would you like me to make it?" as admirable enthusiasm for your arguable point of view, rather than an insult directed at one who has in the past praised your nobleness and wisdom. Friends can disagree.

I wonder if your explanation of a boycott might not be more profitably directed toward the quaint fellow who misses the point entirely. I understand perfectly what is being attempted; I just don't agree.

On a scale of "not a snow ball's chance in hell" to zero I would appreciate your honest opinion as to whether the girlcott will succeed; I believe you when you say you will boycott... as horny as you are this will put a dint in the income of certain agencies and ladies but I doubt it will bring them to their knees (bad joke). Who else will follow in a meaningful boycott?
 

Dee

Banned
Mar 26, 2004
908
2
0
Visit site
Hello Dee,

I have a numer of points to address in your post. First of all, the removed posts in this thread had nothing to do with the topic of the thread. They were removed because they were totally off topic and were basically a minor flame war among certain members. If there had been anything pertinent in any of those posts, it would have remained in the thread and the garbage edited out. You will notice that there is a post in this thread that led to the suspension of a member, Man Spor. While the member was suspended for the post, the post remains as it is pertinent to this thread. Any attempts to claim censorship in this thread are made only to sow suspicion and not based on any factual basis.

Second point, CS Martin is not revealing any personal information in his post. Personal information constitutes information that may be used to identify the real identity of a member or their place of residence. There is none of that in his post. If he wishes to post his experiences as a merc moderator in the goal of informing this community of how that board is run, he is free to do so.

Final point, you should take another look at the title of this thread. The main reason I have allowed this thread to go on is so that the MERB community may have a chance to defend themselves against the constant lies, insults and attacks leveled at the members of this board with impunity by certain members of merc. The proposed boycott by the members is in the goal of getting Tom to actually get off his ass and do some proper moderation on his board. I see nothing about providing protection for SPs as this is something that can never be achieved by any message board. It is, however, possible for a board's moderators to prevent constant attacks on SPs who wish to post on a board and allow them to contribute along with any other member with the same rights in regards to personal attacks and insults on the board. All members on MERB are subject to the same rules and regulations in regards to conduct and posting.

I understand that your usual tactic is to attempt to turn a thread in a different direction by going on the attack and trying to discredit the other posters in the thread. That will not work in this thread. The reason this thread exists is to put pressure on Tom to clean up his board. Nothing more, nothing less.

If Tom wishes this to stop, he simply has to remove any and all reference to this board and it's members. If he complies with this, MERB will return to our policy of asking members to refrain from mentioning any other board in their posts. Peaceful co-existence was once the norm between the two boards and that policy was not broken here, it was broken on merc.


Mod 8

Thanks for your reply Mod8.

When u talk about me attacking others... please review my first post here... I didn't initiate anything; I responded.

I know we don't see eye to eye but I sincerely thank you for not banning me.

(I hate to admit it... and I know it won't happen... but I would love to meet you over a pleasant and calm meal in Montreal. You are an enigma to me.)

Take care.
 

Dee

Banned
Mar 26, 2004
908
2
0
Visit site
Dee,

Thank you for the compliment. With respect to the private information you mention. Certain parties had made, and continue to make, unsupported allegations about my past dealings in this nasty little community of ours. I was simply being allowed to "tell my side of the story", as certain idiots always believe their less than reliable sources. That being said, there will be some other upcoming disclosures to refute many of the other stories being pasted around about me. While I don't really care what certain folks think about me, I do want to be left alone to post without the constant BS accusations of these morons, who tend to talk rather than think.

Signed,
Glad to be a Maverick's Maverick

P.S. Upcoming, that night at the airport.....the untold story.

Thanks CSM. your version of "the airport story"... I've heard one version... I look forward to your point of view.

When I say "maverick's maverick"... I mean it, you can't really be categorized. You aren't in anybody's camp.

Take care
 
Last edited:

CS Martin

Banned
Apr 21, 2007
1,097
0
0
Thanks CSM. your version of "the airport story"... I've heard one version... I look forward to your point of view.

When I say "maverick's maverick"... I mean it you, can't really be categorized. You aren't in anybody's camp.

Take care

Don't want to be.
 

sapman99

Born again punter
Nov 13, 2005
709
46
28
65
Buddha-Bar
Dissecting the Tool’s cult of personality

Well, Tom can see for certain that his warning to Ziggy (The Huge ..ck) “not to be so viciously confrontational” fell on completely deaf ears. :confused:

Ziggy may post what he does for various reasons, only known to him… But the main one by far is to be noticed. He doesn’t care if it’s good or bad, in fact he has noticed that “bad boys” get more attention and this is what he is concentrating on.:cool:

Lettuce take his “contributions” on the other side and shred them but good. Here we go.

  • He talks about “my favorite” drugging herself up before dates. Newsflash: youth and drugs have long been synonymous; the drugs are just different now. Clubbing and drugs go hand in hand, and many of Montréal’s SP’s are club girls. If you don’t recognize this reality and hold on to the illusion only my favorite allegedly indulges in such a practice, you are way, way out to lunch and actually not looking in a mirror as hard as I am.
  • He rails against the CIM list here. Then, in a review thread where he systematically attempts to destroy an escort on MERC (we are talking about punching until the opponent is totally down here) , he finishes a post by saying he met a certain other escort after, to feel better. Well, the lady is a well-known CIMSW specialist… Not only that, the agency where she works has a member’s site where you can peruse which girl will perform such and such extreme acts outside the GFE norm. By the way, that girl likes wine, a lot! The more wine, the more liberal the service…
  • So you want 4SOG in an hour by the girl you are “in love with”? How is that better than CIM?
  • Real men don’t say it once and repeat it “the girls love me”. They let the girls say it themselves.
  • This whole idea of associating the conflict between EQ and MERC is ludicrous. We are in a conflict with the MERC owner and main moderator for letting lies, personal information and outright hateful attacks generate from his URL. It is not our fault if MERC is also at odds with yet another board…:rolleyes:
  • Ziggy makes a reference to an email between him and a member (that he names) he is at odds with in one of his posts. Big no-no.
  • Oh no, no insults on MERC “mon ostie d’écoeurant”… Anyway you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Ziggy is also very opportunistic: like I mentioned higher up, he recently crucified an escort on MERC in a 15-post attack against her. He knew beforehand that because the lady stirs controversy, that he wouldn’t called much on it and that it would even gain him some popularity. What a gent…

Tom, it seems Ziggy can’t “moderate” himself, that word is not part of his makeup…
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Toronto Escorts