Why people do not share reviews and why some agencies are not reviewed?

[UncleBob]

...There are a lot of good clients on Merb... these girls deserve better clients over the shitty non-stop drunk and high bargain pushers they get flooded with...

The problems of many of the clients using ad's sites as reported by girls are the fact that there are many unreliable client, always negciating, asking for BBFS etc...

Merb clients can be seen as "better" client because they are not negociating much even with indies. (There is no negociation with Agencies).
But as I can read and hear here and there and as it has been reported by quite a few experienced SP's, merbists can be a pain sometime...
IMHO, the Merb standard of 2 sogs and more per hour is partly responsible of this.

- Here is a quote from another thread talking about booking indies:

...I also never mention merb as I have been told, some don't like merb at all

- A merb friend told me he met a girl 2 weeks ago from a known agency and she told him: "Merbists are the worst" (She is still active at the agency and have glory reviews)
- 1 or 2 years ago, a new SP friend of another very popular SP at a very popular agency that I first met on ad's site and then, after she experienced work at Agency that promised her to book gentle guys for her beginning, she told be they were top demanding... She stopped SPing not long after.
- There are MANY fake calls for indies and I guess for agencies as well. From the competition or some no life guys... With the Burner/textme apps alike, that is becoming a plague.
- Some SP's told me they just HATE multi sogs/toys etc. I mean, MSOG/Toys/Trying to make the SP squirt is great and it is easier when the girl is a HDH seeing one guy per day. But for High Volume SP's from agencies or indies, It's not pleasant...
SP Quotes:
* 2 Sogs involving two penetrations in one hour is extremely difficult.
* Guys have a sog after 35 min and they think they can do another one the rest of the time. We just happen sucking soft dicks (VERY Difficult), Or Get drilled 1 hour in a row, or Suck until our Jaw is falling apart.
* Guys tries to maximize their investment by retaining their orgasm (ask the girl to slow down for 30 sec to keep them on the edge). And then, when there is 5 min remaining, they cannot come and the girl has to make overtime without complaining...


As far as I can see, 200$ SP merb Clients are the more demanding.
Hats off to Agency girls!
I've been told that when SP fees are > 250, the clients are less demanding... They're looking more for a great intimate time that also invole some "companionship" time.

Some SPs should write a book about what they have to do and endure with a smile for the $$ to please us...

However I believe that like bad reviews, it takes one abnormally demanding guy to ruin 20 good previous experience an SP had...
I also think there are SP that are more "fragile" than others...

 

[neverbored]

However I believe that like bad reviews, it takes one abnormally demanding guy to ruin 20 good previous experience an SP had...

ok, so I agree, not all reviews are constructive... there are those you can clearly see they are over the top on their expectations... wayyyy over the top. The guys that see SPs thinking they apply better business bureau practices or are pissed off because the girl wasn't wearing exactly what she has on in her ad pics really cringy.

I guess I'm a bit nostalgic of the days when there were more active reviews on a larger number of girls. With the growing number of members, you'd think more would be interested in contributing information... I mean there are more questions in 411 than reviews

 

[Easy going]

My take with regards to not sharing the girls review is that people do not want to share. they want exclusivity. However, why do agents such as mojo, Godiva and even the newest Mike Mansions (which has several unreviewed girls) do not get many reviews?

Some of the SPs that I’ve seen explicitly asked me not to post any reviews despite us having an outstanding session together. I never understood why till an incident occurred.

I was PM’ed by a merb member requesting details on an SP that I had seen. He specifically asked me if she offered two specific activities. Based on my experience with her, I told him that she did. He eventually got back to me after his session and I was dismayed to find out that she did not offer those activities. He did not see reason to ask her prior to the session if she was ok with the activities as he got confirmation from me. He just inquired about a GFE session. I guess she must not have been feeling well or she just had a bad day when they had their session.

So in summary, some SPs prefer not to be reviewed due to explicit details that are usually specified within the reviews. If she has a bad day, she may not be at ease in engaging in specific activities. We’re all human after all and we all have bad days.

 

[neverbored]

He eventually got back to me after his session and I was dismayed to find out that she did not offer those activities

ya... many guys just don't understand the concept of YMMV

 

[CLOUD 500]

So in summary, some SPs prefer not to be reviewed due to explicit details that are usually specified within the reviews. If she has a bad day, she may not be at ease in engaging in specific activities. We’re all human after all and we all have bad days.

That is true but she still expects to be paid regular price regardless. Clients do not get the choice maybe a client is having a bad day (too many bills or unforeseen expenses) and will offer less money. It does not work that way. If she is having a bad day she should take the day off instead of offering sub par service. That is not fair to clients who work hard for their money. And if there are some services she only offers to some then this should be advertised clearly as YMMV. So reviews are needed so we get an idea as to how YMMV she might be. I personally will never book an escort with no reviews. I cannot go into a session where an escort will not want to do DFK... I will just send her away.

 

[Easy going]

If she is having a bad day she should take the day off instead of offering sub par service. That is not fair to clients who work hard for their money.

Me personally, I always like to go into details with the SP prior to meeting. This way if she’s having an off day, we can always reschedule. Without specifying details, she’s not sure what the guy expects. If all you ask is for GFE or PSE, then she could assume that you don’t really care what activities are on the menu.

 

[Easy going]

ya... many guys just don't understand the concept of YMMV

True. However, if an SP had a bad day (say she had car trouble), then she may not be in the mood for specific scenarios during your time together. This has never happened to me personally, however I’m sure it does happen from time to time to fellow hobbyists. We’re all human and bad days affect us all.

Let’s say I had to give a presentation to a room full of shareholders on the morning when I was stuck in traffic due to an accident. I would still give the presentation, however, I’d likely give a shortened or mini version of what I had initially planned. I realize that I’d be shortchanging the shareholders, however due to extenuating circumstances beyond my control, I had no choice in the matter. The same applies to SPs. Sometimes, due to circumstances or events beyond their control, a session may not unfold how you expect. SPs are not robots, they are human just like the rest of us. It’s important to show compassion, after all I’d expect the same behavior from the shareholders when I’m having an off day.

 

[Canada501st]

Me personally, I always like to go into details with the SP prior to meeting. This way if she’s having an off day, we can always reschedule. Without specifying details, she’s not sure what the guy expects. If all you ask is for GFE or PSE, then she could assume that you don’t really care what activities are on the menu.

How would you do it? When I ask for some specific activities, the agency would just tell me that its YMMV. And there is no way you can discuss this with the SP unless she gives you your personal contact information. If you were talking about indies than it makes sense.

 

[Easy going]

How would you do it? When I ask for some specific activities, the agency would just tell me that its YMMV. And there is no way you can discuss this with the SP unless she gives you your personal contact information. If you were talking about indies than it makes sense.

I agree for Indies, it’s fairly simple. However when dealing with agencies, there is always a way. In my experience they will usually forward your request to the SP. The SP will then read the context of your email and provide feedback to the agency. Some agency SPs are merb members, so it’s possible to check with them on merb. Others have their own website. You can always get an email address from fellow merb members who have seen that specific SP. After a first session, some agency SPs have routinely given me their email address in order to get in touch with them prior to contacting the agency to discuss our session together. Then contacting the agency is merely done to schedule the session.

 

[CLOUD 500]

Me personally, I always like to go into details with the SP prior to meeting. Without specifying details, she’s not sure what the guy expects. If all you ask is for GFE or PSE,

I agree with you on that one... I am always very specific and I make it clear I want DFK. The rest is negotiable but DFK is mandatory. If not then I move on.

 

[CLOUD 500]

How would you do it? When I ask for some specific activities, the agency would just tell me that its YMMV.

I would ask at the start of the meeting. If she does not agree to a specific service then send her away. But this is the purpose of reviews. I avoid girls with no reviews.

 

[UncleBob]

A SP asking me not to review would have to give me a good reason (Discretion etc).
Usually, they don't ask unless I bring up the subject.
If I bring up the subject of reviewing, it's because it was really good.
Because, if it was not a good session, she will get a consequent review no matter what.

So I believe asking to not post good reviews is not a good idea because someone that received a bad service wont ask permission to post his bad experience.

The more positive review posts she gets (in her good days) the least effect will have the less good reviews (in her YMMV bad days)...


They're details I will not put in reviews now.
I've learned to limit myself to the GFE services in the details of my reviews (DFK, BBBJ, DATY/69).
For the other specific services lile COF, CIM, CIMSW, etc, I will only specify if advertised or agreed with her to mention it.
Because they are very YMMV services that many SP do not provide systematically.
So mentionning in a review that I got COF, CIM, CIMSW may creates expectations.
The SP's will receive plenty of calls of clients who want to get those specific services when she does not want to give to every single clients.

Should a merbist asks me (PM) if a reviewed SP I've met, does swallow, I will reply "I don't know, you should ask her!" even if I got this service.
If I would tell I had CIMSW, then she tells him she does not provide it, he will tell her: But you provided it to UB!
So no more of these thricky PM asking if a girl provides specific service other than what's advertised...

 

[pat98]

Should a merbist asks me (PM) if a reviewed SP I've met, does swallow, I will reply "I don't know, you should ask her!" even if I got this service.
If I would tell I had CIMSW, then she tells him she does not provide it, he will tell her: But you provided it to UB!
So no more of these thricky PM asking if a girl provides specific service other than what's advertised...

Amen !
too much people have totally unbelievable expectations while seeing a girl..
I will never get it... as GFE is the de facto standard, unless a girl is specifically advertising other services NOBODY should expect any obligation to deliver non GFE services if it wasn't advertised or negotiated before seeing her !
Especially because one was bragging about it ! wtf esti

 

[Rusty Staub]

Returning back to the original subject of the thread, I do find it interesting that certain MERB advertisers literally get almost zero reviews.

I am sure there are others but Maximum, QOS, Xxxeption, and even Wildtime come to mind. They have been on here for years so they must be getting calls (or at least perceive they do) from MERB members.

 

[Halloween Mike]

Think it is has to do with the numbers. Back in the days Wildtime had several reviews but they had more girls. Most of there current girls that i see listed usually are there for a while, so probably guys don't see the point of reviewing them every time they repeat.

When it comes to other agency, i could be mistaken but i checked QOS ads and i see no mention of "GFE" but rather "VIP Escorts". If its not GFE personally i won't even give a second look to the agency no matter how beautifull the girls may be... Im sure lots of merb members think the same. Again maybe they are GFE, but its not mentioned in there ads.

 

[jalimon]

If I would tell I had CIMSW, then she tells him she does not provide it, he will tell her: But you provided it to UB!

And now imagine when not only you get CIMSW or another extra but you got it as a freebie on top of it

Great post UB, as usual...!

Cheers,

 

[Mohamed]

Why? It doesn't matter why. The only response you will ever get from me is: if something bugs you, fix it yourself. People don't share reviews? Share yours! Some agencies are not reviewed? Review those agencies! You might create a trend. If not, so be it. There's your answer.

 

[hungry101]

A SP asking me not to review would have to give me a good reason (Discretion etc).
Usually, they don't ask unless I bring up the subject.
If I bring up the subject of reviewing, it's because it was really good.
Because, if it was not a good session, she will get a consequent review no matter what.

So I believe asking to not post good reviews is not a good idea because someone that received a bad service wont ask permission to post his bad experience.

They're details I will not put in reviews now.
So mentionning in a review that I got COF, CIM, CIMSW may creates expectations.
The SP's will receive plenty of calls of clients who want to get those specific services when she does not want to give to every single clients.

Should a merbist asks me (PM) if a reviewed SP I've met, does swallow, I will reply "I don't know, you should ask her!" even if I got this service.
If I would tell I had CIMSW, then she tells him she does not provide it, he will tell her: But you provided it to UB!
So no more of these thricky PM asking if a girl provides specific service other than what's advertised...

This is all so very true and logical. Yes, if she does a bad job and I am left with a bad experience that girl is getting a bad review no questions asked. IF she does a great job I may ask if it is OK if I write a review and are there is anything she would rather I didn't put in the review. The better the job she does the more say so she has. If a girl tells me not to write about a service than I feel obliged to respect that.

The funny thing is that most girls in Montreal seem to have a positive attitude about MERB. I compare this to ISG at the FKKs. The rule there is to never mention ISG. It is sort of like Fight Club. I wonder if we would all be better off if we never mentioned MERB or our handles in Montreal? I do feel a bit hamstrung by agency owners knowing my handle...but on the other hand, I get great service in Montreal, so I guess I have to factor that in too.

When it comes to other agency, i could be mistaken but i checked QOS ads and i see no mention of "GFE" but rather "VIP Escorts". If its not GFE personally i won't even give a second look to the agency no matter how beautifull the girls may be... Im sure lots of merb members think the same. Again maybe they are GFE, but its not mentioned in there ads.

I just saw this. I had no idea what they meant by VIP. I was wondering if it was another agency sort of like a sister agency to QOS. Everything about QOS confuses me. With the name Queen of Spades, I thought they would be all black girls or maybe girls that preferred black guys.

 

[Sol Tee Nutz]

With the name Queen of Spades, I thought they would be all black girls or maybe girls that preferred black guys.

Still laughing as I type, the political correct ones will get you for this. Did you assist in the writing for Blazing Saddles?

 

[hungry101]

No, but I liked the movie. Mel Brooks' best in my opinion.

Seriously, legend has it that white women that want black cock will frequently get a queen of spades tattoo or wear a charm of the Queen of Spades on an anklet.

Case in point:
https://www.amazon.com/20-Queen-Spa...D=412-dJY7SzL&preST=_SY300_QL70_&dpSrc=detail
https://www.amazon.com/Spade-Queen-Spades-Anklets-Silver/dp/B074YG6BBK

Look at the adds for tattoos and anklets with the Queen of Spades and what does it say? For alternative intentions....Hot Wife, Cuckoldress, and BBC (Big Black Cock)

I'm not making this up.