Why so some SP's not like DFK or its restriction?
- Thread starter Pablo1234
- Start date
Even asking if the girl has any restrictions is weird imho. I prefer asking "what are your restrictions".
I just get directly to the point. I will almost always ask if booking an Indy if DFK is offered. With agencies it does not quiet work because you are dealing with a middle man, I will read reviews of the girl I am interested to book.
True say. Seems true especially with Indys, GFE has become more YMMV. I find the Indys who are YMMV are usually the ones that dislike reviews being posted and/or have NRP. But at those prices, I think being more clear and not using GFE as a marketing tool to get customers is important.
The thing is kissing and intimacy of really nice slow sensual kissing is as good as, if not better than the sex. It's what makes it feel less transactional. Imo it's what gfe is all about. Not feeling rushed or feeling like a client for the course of the session. There's such emphasis on the service including xyz, but it's the pace and energy.
From my experience i’d say that 80% of the ladies i met in the business told me that they weren’t very fond of the kissing/dfk part although they all offered it. This included very popular sps whose dfk skills people raved about in their reviews. When i inquired why they still did it the usual response was that they felt they didn’t have much of a choice since most girls did it & agencies they worked for demanded it. Sometimes they’d mention it was very difficult to do with clients who either had bad breath or didn’t believe in brushing their teeth or any dental hygiene. I knew exactly how they felt since i’ve went out with girls who had bad breath or smoked so yeah…kissing ain’t fun in those cases! Lol. A few girls even told me the kissing part was the hardest part of their job & this included with regulars they’d seen several times.
Well.
Apparently I dont fit the GFE criteria since I don't offer DFK. But I do other things that others dont offer…….
So. I just end up sending my “menu” lmao. And everything is clear, concise and explained..
One of the biggest reasons as to why people refer to it as the “OG GFE”.
Things changed and ladies decided they didn’t need to push their own boundaries and fake kiss others. Because trust me there are many that do it only for the job and when they text their friends about it after it’s about how gross it was.
But hey… whatever floats everyone’s boats.
E x a c t l yFair point, and even if he was the first client, it doesn't mean that the SP doesn't have a BF / partner. Then again, you also don't know if you were the client's first SP and who knows which Y or O he dined at before.
I’ve had clients tell me about how they just got back from seeing XYZ in a day - in a smug, bragging kinda way.. (didn’t accept further bookings)
So… being told that while you’re laying in bed and getting the visual about his tongue going in and out of coochie and booty holes is not a turn on… ESPECIALLY after he just did the very same to me. Lol. How do I know the guy cleaned up proper in between. Issa no for me.
I totally respect people who seek DFK though, it’s a personal choice! I DFK cock n balls. Not mouths.
Last edited:
Am I the only one that thinks YMMV is bizarre? Why would I wanna play favourites and push my own boundaries to people please? Idk. Never understood that.
Agreed, now can you imagine how much of a turn on it must be to be #5 or #6 or more when you book a favourite agency lady.
Yes there is such a thing as mouth wash and showers but still not exactly a turn on.
When I think of agencies I always see the I Love Lucy episode where she is trying to pack chocolates coming on a conveyor belt into a box and it keeps speeding up until there are chocolates flying everywhere. Don’t want to be one of the chocolates.
This is one of the reasons I don’t use agencies.
DFK or LFK that is always debatable and to me what ever fits the occasion I am fine with, but no kissing at all will result in that one single visit.
It seems like common sense to me. If someone has bad breath or whatever they reserve the right to refuse certain things. I love when I hear about dudes getting turned away at the door for something (being unclean or intoxicated for example). It means the SP has standards. I've been non monog for over a decade and I'm sex positive, but I wouldn't want to kiss or be intimate with any person that steps up. I prefer when things are ymmv or at thier discretion, as much as I prefer low volume providers.
T
Toto beefcake
Haha at the texting part Id say majority do it for the job. The venting is funny after the fact. Given the fact that so many dont know how to kiss and reinact a hentai video and assume its top lol . ( To quote a favorite line from a famous movie “ ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED “
Sorry I don’t share your common sense..
My common sense is more like: I wouldn’t put out and play favourites to please people / play favourites.
What you’re describing is not YMMV. It’s just basic standards to me.
YMMV is when an SP gives extras that she wouldn’t do in the first place.
Why would an SP treat a client like a project who can “do better?” It’s odd. It’s like taking them by the hand and giving them a golden star sticker in kindergarten. Lmao. “Good job here’s your reward” type of thing.
Extras are extras - I wouldn’t sell myself short hahaha literally.
And if he’s gross then I’ll never see him again.
Last edited:
T
Toto beefcake
I dont know man, that seems like basic hygiene to me. Not ymmv
Yeah I’m not about to mommy people about hygiene.
“Here’s a free rimjob for your clean dick”
That sounds like a winning advertisement to me.
Be careful though they will start to clean other parts also.
Similar threads
- Locked
