I'm curious about this idea of talking to other SPs about a particular SP.. I don't find it a good idea to gossip personally, and some people may not get along or not have good intentions. There's a SP I have had a really bad falling out with and who really betrayed me, but for this person's safety, I would NEVER say anything negative about them. SPs don't see how others work.. Unless we do duos together, there is nothing we know about the quality of other people's service. Also we they may not like each other for various reasons. I don't think its a good idea to ask SPs for personal info about other people.. Idk.for me, how long it takes is proportional to cost of services (higher the cost, the pickier and more careful I am) and uncertainty around the provider.
below are factors that make a decision easier to make (some are weighted more heavily than others):
pics available (including unfiltered, non-enhanced ones) (+)
reviews available (+)
active on social media (X, OnlyFans, IG, TikTok, etc) and comports oneself well/reflects an appealing personality (+)
posts on message board(s) and comports oneself well/reflects an appealing personality (+)
has a website, ads (on reputable platforms), and non-generic, chat-GBT-generated-type self descriptions reflecting an appealing personality (+)
common interests or interests that are interesting (+) (particularly important for SPs I'm planning on spending social time with)
does duos with and/or is associated with reputable SPs (+) (doing duos is immaterial; it's more the "endorsement" effect I'm referring to)
positive word-of-mouth from other SPs I see (+)
comports themselves well in direct correspondence (including by providing timely responses when coordinating date/time) (+)
has a no review policy (-)
no pics, only obscured pics and/or overly glamorized and enhanced pics, dated pics (-)
no reviews or few reviews from obvious shills (e.g., one post accounts) (-)
most recent review is several years old (-)
no social media activity (-)
social media or message board activity but conducts themselves poorly (-) (most the SPs who post on MERB conduct themselves in a way that makes me more interested in seeing them (or seeing them again, in some cases), including you @Lunaseraphim )
zero common interests and zero interesting interests (-)
ads are only on LeoList (-)
negative word-of-mouth from other SPs I see (- or +/- (neutral)) (I take this with a grain of salt but it doesn't help)
comports themselves poorly in direct correspondence, including slow response time and flakiness (-)
that being said, sometimes this all goes out the window and I just take a more impulsive gamble because my curiosity gets the better of me. sometimes this gamble has paid off and the previously "high uncertainty" SP has become my regular.
As for people who have only posted one or two reviews, I feel like sometimes a client may really want to support a SP if they haven't had any reviews in a while or if something bad has been written about them. A lot of people have accounts on here dating from a long time and don't really post or very rarely post..
The other things you mention make complete sense, if someone only has a leolist ad, no social media, no clear pics, that's obviously not a very good sign
Last edited:




