GMA... Please explain why the last 3 iceages were different from the last one a tropical equator the one before slush and the one before that soild ice, this is well before industrial man. Now explain why changing weather scares you so much.
You changed this post. Initially you asked me to show you the evidence that the current global warming is just part of the usual cycle established by the last 3 ice ages. You specifically requested evidence. So I searched and found that superb summary article in Post #365 titled
"How We Know Today's Climate Change Is Not Natural" (Renee Cho, Earth Institute, Columbia University. It provided charts and graphs and clear eyed scientific research outlining the various lines of evidence leading 97-98% of scientists to conclude that climate change is human induced. When I returned to Merb the next day, you had changed your post, but I thought this article still relevant to your request.
The scientific evidence is that the ice ages have rapidly changed.
I am not and have never denied climate change and have said this many times.... We all know that if every human on earth died the climate would still change, do we not...
Also find it weird that you think I do not agree the climate is changing when I stated so many times I do yet you give me stuff to read. Comprehension.....
You obviously did not read Cho's article that shows the current global warming is far more rapid than that of the ice ages, so your statement is false. Many climate change deniers, now faced with the overwhelming evidence around them of global warming realize they look foolish as the earth experiences increasingly frequent examples of catastrophe (wild fires, coral reefs dying, horrific weather extremes, water shortages, melting glaciers, etc. So now many like you decide to stubbornly ignore the science and hide behind the "okay it's obviously getting warmer, but you can't prove it's mankind that's responsible." So analogous to Republican Senators who first claimed Trump's impeachment was a witch hunt based on lies, but when faced with overwhelming evidence from so many of Trump's staff, associates, intelligence officials, and diplomats....they now say okay Trump was wrong, but it's not bad enough to impeach. In both cases, you guys keep moving the goal posts in order to achieve the desired effect of denial. So I lump STN in with the climate change deniers because you are cut from the same cloth on the same issue, and would be happy to entertain your suggestions for a new name you can fly under.
I know you are joking with that stuff, but some people actually believe this sort of thing is evidence.
SS, we keep giving them evidence in this thread, and they simply refuse to read it. Or they have read it and pretend it's not there. Like Cho wrote, they never introduce scientific evidence to the contrary, just crickets when it comes to science.