The places in the USA with the harshest rules have the worst outbreaks. I'll be honest I don't know why, but it tells me the lock downs aren't working and the reason our numbers are declining is vaccines
www.nydailynews.com
Wow Diane Francis!!! One of the least credible "journalist" in Canada.Here is what our useless leader is known for
Diane Francis: Pandemic failure is Trudeau's biggest scandal yet (msn.com)
^^^^^ Odd that the vaccine does not stop you from getting the virus or transmitting it, only makes it so you do not get very ill.
Another great mystery with this vaccine and virus.
Who care about the journalist if the points presented are true about the virus handling. Just like some of your group saying a video is not credible due to the one presenting it, really?If you wanna bash someone, Jason Kenney is the one who failed all the way. His own party is blaming him now.
Maybe but... they will still vote for those guys and the conservative party. The last polls show that Albertans still support the Conservative (47%), Liberal (23.7%) and NDP (19%) which is a huge support. [...]Nice attempt though. BTW, most Albertans do not like Kenny or O'Toole.
I understand that, it is meant to ease the hospital cases.A vaccine never prevent you from getting the virus. [...]
Easing the hospital cases is a consequence. Vaccination prevent peoples getting very sick and dying. Even if we could triple the nurses, doctors and facilities, the problem would still be terrible for peoples. It is a human problem, not a purely logistic one. But you are right consequences are big and serious.I understand that, it is meant to ease the hospital cases.
It’s not a mystery but basic immuno fuckin ology^^^^^ Odd that the vaccine does not stop you from getting the virus or transmitting it, only makes it so you do not get very ill.
Another great mystery with this vaccine and virus.
You do not get sarcasm at all do you?It’s not a mystery but basic immuno fuckin ology
Hence easing the hospital cases. Vaccination prevent peoples getting very sick and dying.
I tried to read the article but it stops part way through and asks you to join, fuck I hate that. That I did read is that it " can ", I do not like words like can and may, will is good, can and may is not. I can and may win a lottery is not as good as I will win a lottery. I will do some checking on this info though. My checking will be to see how long you would need to be vaccinated for this effect to happen or how long the virus needs to be in your system to deteriorate, can you still spread it to full strength for the first 7 days?GOOD NEWS!!!
Yes, vaccines block most transmission of COVID-19 PUBLISHED APRIL 21, 2021
![]()
Yes, vaccines block most transmission of COVID-19
The latest data show that getting a shot not only protects vaccinated individuals, it reduces the chance they can spread the virus to others.www.nationalgeographic.com
In fact it will vary from one individual to another. Upon vaccination 2 things happen. First you produce antibodies that will attack the virus (the antigen) directly and secondly you will get T-cells that will keep in memory the caracteristics of the virus. Let say a while after vaccination you get infected again. The remaining antibodies will be your first defense and will bind to the virus and neutralise hopefully most of them but not all. The neutralised virus will be recognised by the T-Cell ant this cells will sort of eat it. This is the second line of defense. But what is interesting is that those T-cells will also recognize the infected cells (within the lung) that some virus succeeded to penetrate and will kill those cells preventing the replication of the virus to continue. As those processes go on either your body will completely destroy the virus quickly and you don't even have symptoms, or it may take longer, you will be sick and eventually heal. But it is also possible that your immunity is not so strong and by the time all the defense strategy is in place you will be badly infected and affected and it can be a severe disease or you may even die. So there is no way a vacine can be 100% effective, each person acquiring a different immunity. That is why a vaccinated person is still at risk. She may have 95% of probability to fight efficiently the virus but there is still this 5%... If a high percentage of the people around are vaccinated (usually over 75%) the virus will not find easily the hosts to replicate and the spreading will go down by a lot. In this case, even if you haven't been vaccinated the probability to be infected is much lower. But there are a lot of caveats... This goes on with the original virus against which the vaccine was developed. When variants appear and if they are more contagious than the 75% may not be enough. That is why it is so important to vaccinate the higher number of persons as soon as possible. We would then prevent the probability that a very dangerous variant occurs. What is specially bad in Alberta is that polls show that 28% of the population do not want a vaccine or maybe only later... Later might be too late... Time is very important....can you still spread it to full strength for the first 7 days?




